Статья 'Представления о "латинском пленении" в отечественной истории философии' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

The representations of "Latin captivity" in the Russian history of philosophy

Sizov Sergei Evgenievich

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2262-723X

Senior Educator, the department of General Humanities, Kuzbass Orthodox Theological Seminar

650003, Russia, Kemerovskaya oblast', g. Kemerovo, prospekt Shakhterov, 23

sseezov@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2022.1.36672

Review date:

20-10-2021


Publish date:

10-02-2022


Abstract: The subject of this research is the history of the concept of "Latin captivity" since its articulation among senior Slavophiles and namely Y. F. Samarin to modern version of the Archpriest G. Florovsky and Priest V. Zenkovsky, as well as om the context of modern research on the history of Russian religious philosophy. Although the very concept of "Latin captivity" has become fundamental for assessing the interaction of theology and philosophy in the Russian religious thought, it is being increasingly criticized due to explicit reductionism and slating facts to the research model. The scientific novelty lies in description of the history of existence of the historical-philosophical concept of "Latin captivity", including not only the study of its genesis, but also the analysis of ongoing polemics around its correspondence with the scientific data. The article determines the merits and demerits of the concept, as well as the prospects for its implementation in the context of scientific works on the history of religious philosophy. The study demonstrates that although the idea of the "Latin captivity" provided the fertile ground, a certain simple myth for describing the history of philosophy, it can be replaced by other concurrent theories that better cope with the same task of creating a single methodological framework for historical-philosophical research.


Keywords:

the concept of the Latin captivity, the Babylonian captivity of theology, Russian religious thought, Orthodox theology, laic theology, Georgiy Florovsky, Slavophiles, academic theology, scholasticism, Russian religious philosophy

This article is automatically translated. You can find full text of article in Russian here.


References
1.
Florovskii G. V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Otv. red. O. Platonov. — M.: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2009. — 848 s.
2.
Zen'kovskii V. Istoriya russkoi filosofii. — M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, Raritet, 2001. — 880 s. — (Summa).
3.
Stefan Yavorskii i Feofan Prokopovich. Samarin Yu.F. Sobranie sochinenii: V 5 t. T.2. Tserkov' i obshchestvo / Pod obshch. red. A.N. Nikolyukina; Sost., podg. Teksta, komment., ukazat. Imen A.N. Nikolyukina i T.F. Prokopova. Poslesl. A.A, Popova / Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN. SPb.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo “Rostok”», 2014. – 720 s.
4.
Yurii Samarin. Predislovie k pervomu izdaniyu. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii Alekseya Stepanovicha Khomyakova. Tom vtoroi. Izdanie tret'e. M.: V universitetskoi tipografii (M. Katkov), na Strastnom bul'vare. 1886. – 450 s.
5.
Zavitnevich V.V. Aleksei Stepanovich Khomyakov. T.I. Kn.1. K.: Tipografiya I.I. Gorbunova, 1902.
6.
Davydenkov O., prot. Dogmaticheskoe Bogoslovie: Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Izd-vo PSTGU, 2013. – 622 s.
7.
K.M. Antonov. «Ya, blagodarenie Bogu, ne bogoslov…»: stanovlenie russkoi religioznoi filosofii i istoki kontseptsii zapadnogo pleneniya pravoslavnogo bogosloviya // Khristianskoe chtenie. №3. M., 2015. S. 68-92.
8.
A. Buzdalov «Plenenie skholastikoi i osvobozhdenie sofistikoi, ili eshche raz o “yuridicheskoi” teorii iskupleniya». URL: https://pravoslavie.ru/73158.html
9.
Zrak'' raba priim''... K voprosu ob iskazheniyakh ortodoksal'nogo ponimaniya Bogovoploshcheniya v katolicheskoi i pravoslavnoi bogoslovskoi mysli kontsa XIX – nachala XXI v. / K. G. Shakhbazyan, V. V. Krymov, M. A. Shakhbazyan. – Krasnodar: Traditsiya, 2020. – 362 s.
10.
Khondzinskii P., prot. «Tserkov' ne est' akademiya»: Russkoe vneakademicheskoe bogoslovie XIX veka. — M.: Izd-vo PSTGU, 2016.-480 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website