Статья 'Современные проблемы социализации подростков в школе' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

Modern problems of socialization of teenagers at school

Ovchinnikov Dmitrii

ORCID: 0009-0003-2327-336X

PhD in Pedagogy

Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Tolstoy Tula State Pedagogical University

300026, Russia, Tula region, Tula, Lenin Avenue, 125, room 309

ovchin2002@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2023.10.44219

EDN:

ZUSZIU

Received:

30-09-2023


Published:

07-10-2023


Abstract: The subject of the study is the concept of socialization applicable to school education and adolescence. Based on the analysis of various sources, the characteristic features of this process are noted. With the help of the data obtained in the course of an independently conducted sociological study based on the methods of questionnaire survey, observation, study of documentation, in the schools of the Tula region (with a time gap of 5 years), a whole set of definite conclusions is formulated about certain aspects of the practice of modern school education, its role in the socialization of adolescents, as well as typical problematic aspects of this process are identified in order to take into account and adjust in further work. In particular, there is a tendency to reduce the lack of knowledge of schoolchildren in various academic subjects; modern Tula youth is mainly focused on such areas of activity as economics, management, medicine and healthcare; the main conditions for success in modern society, young people are increasingly inclined to see their own efforts and hard work; that school in our time is not such an agent of socialization, which contributes to the development of teenagers' ideas about the family as the main unit of society; the school in which they study did not have a significant impact on such positions as "plans for the future", "formation of moral qualities of personality", "formation of an active life position", "choice of profession"; the influence of the school on health is negative; in the ranking of institutions responsible for fostering a sense of tolerance in society, the school ranks third after the family with a significant lag and the state; a creative approach in teaching schoolchildren will also help solve the problem of raising the status of a literature teacher in the eyes of students. The main conclusion is that socialization is primarily designed to ensure the constant personal growth of adolescents.


Keywords:

socialization, upbringing, school, teenagers, family, education, teachers, individual, high school students, sociological research

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

There are many definitions of the concept of "socialization" in science. However, within the framework of this study, the formulation given by sociologist Jan Shchepansky seems to us the most productive: "Socialization is the influence of the environment as a whole, which involve an individual to participate in public life, teach him to understand culture, behavior in collectives, assert himself and perform various social roles" [11, p. 51]. At the same time, sociologist I. S. Kohn notes that socialization is close in meaning to the Russian word "education". But, despite the identical etymology, the concept of "education" is somewhat broader. First of all, these are "directed actions through which the individual is consciously trying to instill the desired traits and properties, while socialization, along with education, includes unintentional, spontaneous influences, thanks to which the individual joins culture and becomes a full member of society" [4, p. 134].

The process of socialization continues throughout a person's life. He accepts certain norms of behavior and acts in accordance with them. Socialization is both a source of the process of individualization and freedom. During it, a person develops his individuality, the ability to think and act independently [2].

A person always strives to achieve inner harmony (or its illusion). Solving this task, an individual can take any actions, change himself or influence others, or refuse to see things as they really are. Contradictory experience, which does not agree with what a person thinks about himself, introduces an imbalance in the structure of personality [6, p. 134].

Childhood is recognized as the most important stage of a person's life to ensure the foundations of an individual's socialization. Moreover, if what is almost missed at the subsequent stages of socialization can be made up, then the elements of social life that were not mastered in childhood (language, rules and behaviors, customs and traditions, knowledge and skills, etc.) are practically irreplaceable at the subsequent stages of the life path [3, pp. 92-93].

The transition age activates the work of self-awareness, an assessment of their prospects and capabilities is brought to the fore: a teenager thinks about who he can and should become. Friendship and love reveal the richness of his inner world, and ideological search helps to find his place in public life [9].

Sociologists, psychologists and educators identify several factors influencing the process of socialization – family, equality "relations", schooling, mass media, labor, various organizations.

Let's focus in more detail on such a factor as schooling. The school is no less a unique institution of socialization than the family. Firstly, it determines the social formation of individuals at a certain stage of their life path in almost all countries of the world. There are no more successful widespread institutes of socialization of the younger generation in the world that have a worthy alternative to modern school as an institution of socialization. Secondly, school influences the social development of every young person systematically and over a long period of time (11 years). The socio-psychological patterns of the school's influence on students remain unchanged regardless of the type of school, its location or the quality of education it provides. It should be noted that the socializing functions of the school attract the attention of a much smaller number of researchers than its educational functions, since educational functions are direct, and socializing functions act only as a side effect [1, pp. 55-56].

A special role in modern socialization belongs to education and the acquisition of a profession. Education, the most important element of human potential, can be considered in two aspects in relation to young people. Firstly, to what extent are modern youth ready to take a leading role in the formation and development of a knowledge-based economy in the near future in terms of education level. And secondly, how education can help young people successfully self-actualize, integrate into modern social life and economic reality [8],[10].

As a practical confirmation of the theoretical provisions noted above, we conducted sociological studies in schools of the Tula region (based on similar questionnaire material with a 5-year time difference in surveys), which highlight three main groups of issues: satisfaction of subjects of the educational process with the quality of knowledge received at school, the desire to continue education in higher and secondary vocational education systems, high school students' choice of the sphere of professional activity.

Thus, according to the obtained sociological data, over the past 5 years there has been a tendency to reduce the lack of knowledge of schoolchildren in various academic subjects: significantly – in computer science, noticeably – in foreign languages, geography, biology, mathematics, physics, slightly – chemistry, history, etc. But the lack of knowledge in the Russian language has increased.

As for the choice of a future profession by high school students, the modern Tula youth is mainly focused on such fields of activity as economics, management and management, medicine and healthcare. The percentage of those who are going to devote their lives to law, industry, pedagogy, and the service sector has significantly decreased over the past 5 years. It is also worth noting the increase in the number of young people who did not make their choice at all on the eve of graduation.

Due to the emergence of such opportunities, the number of people wishing to enroll in non-state educational institutions of higher education or in state ones has increased (over the past 5 years), but on a commercial basis (for a fee), which makes it possible to think whether young people are looking for easy ways to get an education and whether its quality is so important for the younger generation of Russians. The percentage of those who made a choice in favor of nonresident universities is significantly higher: these are mainly medical educational institutions.

I would also like to note that young people are increasingly inclined to see their own efforts and hard work as the main conditions for success in modern society, while the role of education has decreased over the past 5 years, albeit slightly.

Touching upon the conversation to what extent modern school contributes to the adaptation of schoolchildren to life, the following data can be given. In accordance with the results of the sociological research, a rating of those aspects for which the school should prepare was formed. According to high school students, this is:

1. Continuing education.

2. Cooperation with other people.

3. Life according to generally accepted norms of morality.

4. Professional career.

5. Independent business life.

6. Careful attitude to your health.

7. Working life.

8. Socio-political career.

9. Family life.

Obviously, such a alignment of value orientations may indicate that the school in our time is not such an agent of socialization that promotes the development of adolescents' ideas about the family as the basic unit of society. And despite the fact that life according to generally accepted norms of morality is put by schoolchildren in the third place in the structure of values. The question arises: what standards of morality are guided by our society? What should young people prepare for: earn money, live beautifully, but only for themselves?

It is also interesting to provide data on the role of school in the formation of a teenager. High school students tend to say that the school in which they study has not had a significant impact on such positions as "plans for the future", "formation of moral qualities of a person", "formation of an active life position", "choice of profession". Here we turn to such a task of school education as the health of the child. After all, it is the influence of school on health that is characterized by a clear negative assessment of high school students.

A comparative analysis of the data of socio-pedagogical monitoring over the past 5 years in the surveyed schools indicates that the use of tobacco products and alcoholic beverages by high school students is gradually decreasing. However, interest in narcotic substances is growing: over these 5 years, the number of teenagers who have tried any drugs has increased from 0.9% of the total number of teenagers to 3.2%.

In addition to education and health care, a modern school should perform another important task – the formation of a tolerant (in the true, and undistorted understanding!) relationships to the outside world. But the data of sociological studies indicate that students of grades 8, 9, 10 are practically not familiar with the concept of "tolerance".

This is not surprising, because in the ranking of institutions responsible for fostering a sense of tolerance in society, the school ranks third after the family and the state with a significant lag (the media is in fourth place). Nevertheless, the school is able to have a significant impact on the formation of a tolerant consciousness of adolescents. According to our sociological research, the majority of teachers are aware of the need for tolerant behavior in society, but only 52% of teachers talk about the activities carried out at school aimed at the formation of tolerance.

Currently, it is especially important that the school is an agent of the cultural heritage of the country and the world as a whole. There is an opinion that two fundamental academic subjects play a special role in the spiritual formation of a young person – history and literature [5, p. 2]. It is on their basis that the socialization of the individual through historical images, the formation of national identity, national pride, national dignity takes place. History and literature provide answers to many questions that arise throughout a person's life, give an idea of the moral norms and rules prevailing in society.

It is known that in modern society there is a problem of reducing the reading activity of the age group from 9 to 15 years. According to parents, the two main factors influencing a child's reading preferences are family and school. However, the analysis of our sociological research data on the classical works read from the school curriculum indicates that the percentage of girls reading is higher than boys (among fifth graders – every 5 girls and every 7 boys, among high school students – every 3 girls and every 5 boys). It is likely that this is due to the fact that the school literature program is designed mainly for girls, and literature teachers are often women, so it is easier for them to find a common language, to understand each other. In such a situation, boys remain outside of discussions due to differences of interests. However, do not forget about the personality of the teacher-writer. His professional skills primarily consist in the ability to involve teenagers in a discussion on the problems of culture, morality and morality that classical literature affects, and not just to designate them in the form of a synopsis or essay compiled with the help of special "manuals" and "cheat sheets" that have filled the market of educational literature for schoolchildren, especially in electronic form.

Not the formal fulfillment of the teacher's official duties, but a creative approach in teaching schoolchildren will also help solve the problem of raising the status of a literature teacher in the eyes of students, the existence of which can be judged by the following data from our sociological research: only 2.9% of schoolchildren share their impressions of the books they read with their teacher; 1.4% of fifth graders and 1.1% of high school students; when choosing a book in the library, only 13.8% of students in grades 8-10 are guided by the advice of their literature teacher.

  In conclusion, I would like to note that socialization is primarily designed to ensure constant personal growth. But this does not mean that it occurs as a progressive upward movement. This is a complex, contradictory, dynamic process, which, especially in young years, is accompanied by crises. Some crises can be overcome, others cannot. A person cannot always cope with the crisis of socialization, and the further development of his personality may not be ascending.

As sociologist Neil Smelzer notes, socialization can never be one hundred percent effective. In particular, children resist the efforts of adults and change the process of socialization at many stages of their development [7, p. 126].

It is customary to call socialization successful if an individual masters the necessary social roles, assimilates values approved by this society, social community, social norms, behavior stereotypes.

In the conditions of modern Russian reality, it is worth seriously thinking about educating a new generation of citizens of such a great country as Russia.

References
1. Andrienko, E. V. (2000). Social psychology. Moscow: Akademiya.
2. Baturin, V. K. (2017). Sociology of education. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA.
3. Kovaleva, A. I. (1996). Socialization of personality: norm and deviation. Moscow: Golos.
4. Kon, I. S. (1988). The child and society. Moscow: Nauka.
5. Editorial article (2005). Where are we going? And where are we taking our students? Open school, 5, 2.
6. Ovchinnikov, D. A. (2022). The main problems of socialization of adolescents with severe somatic diseases. In. L. V. Rudneva (Ed.), Materials of the 1st All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation “Adaptive physical culture and sport: problems, innovations, prospects”  (pp. 134-138). Tula: TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo.
7. Smelzer, N. (1994). Sociology. Moscow: Feniks.
8. Osipov, A. M. (Ed.). (2023). Sociology of education. Moscow: Yurait.
9. Fursova, V. V. (2013). Sociology of education: foreign paradigms and theories. Moscow: Direkt-Media.
10. Chudnova, O. V. (2021). Sociology of education. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: SakhGU.
11. Shchepan'skii, YA. (1969). Elementary concepts of sociology. Moscow: Progress.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The Institute of Education, on the one hand, is one of the most conservative, on the other hand, one of the most frequently reformed. Only over the past hundred years, domestic school education has repeatedly, often radically, changed ideological approaches, reflected both directly in the educational process and in the field of education, not to mention changes in the technical equipment of classrooms. But school is also an institution of socialization, within the framework of which certain norms and patterns of behavior are assimilated: attention to the process of education and youth policy is paid at the highest level today. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the problems of socialization of adolescents at school. The author sets out to define the definition of "socialization", to distinguish between the concepts of socialization and education, as well as to analyze the process of socialization of adolescents at school using specific examples. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the main factors of the process of socialization of adolescents in modern Russian schools. Scientific novelty is also determined by the results of the sociological research conducted by the author. Considering the bibliographic list of the article, its versatility should be noted as a positive point: in total, the list of references includes 11 different sources and studies. Among the works attracted by the author, we note the classic works of N. Smelzer, Ya. Shchepansky, I.S. Kon, as well as the studies of A.I. Kovaleva, D.A. Ovchinnikov, which focus on various aspects of personality socialization. Note that the bibliographic list is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to everyone who is interested in both socialization in general and socialization at school in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "there are no more successful widespread institutions of socialization of the younger generation in the world that have a worthy alternative to modern school as an institution of socialization." The author notes that he conducted sociological research in schools in the Tula region (based on similar questionnaire material with a time difference of 5 years), which highlights three main groups of issues: "satisfaction of subjects of the educational process with the quality of knowledge received at school, the desire to continue education in higher and secondary vocational education systems, the choice of high school students professional activity". The author believes that "in addition to education and health care, a modern school should perform another important task – the formation of a tolerant (in the true, and not distorted understanding!) attitudes to the world around us." In general, the survey data indicate a decrease in knowledge of the Russian language and reading activity, which may cause serious concerns. Among other things, the author here draws attention to the need to raise the status of a literature teacher, but in our opinion, it is necessary to raise the status of both subject teachers and classroom teachers. The main conclusion of the article is that "in the conditions of modern Russian reality, it is worth seriously thinking about educating a new generation of citizens of such a great country as Russia." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in training courses and in the framework of improving youth and social policy. There are comments on the article: so, in conclusion, the author did not fully reflect the collected conclusions, there are also typos in the text. However, in general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal Sociodynamics.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.