Статья 'Ригидность субъектов образования' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru

 

 

Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Ridigity of Subjects of Education

Kukuev Evgenii Anatol'evich

PhD in Psychology

associate professor of the Department of Developmental and Teaching Psychology at Tyumen State University. 

625003, Russia, Tyumen Region, Krasnina str. 19, ap. 14

kea.psy@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0425.2014.4.12796

Review date:

07-08-2014


Publish date:

09-09-2014


Abstract.

In article results of empirical research of subjects of the education conducted in March-April, 2014 are analyzed. Selection was made by teachers of schools, teachers of higher education institution, graduates of schools, college and higher education institution. As object of research the rigidnost of subjects of education acted. The associativity of concepts openness/closeness – a rigidnost is analyzed. The parallel between openness of the person and his relation to innovations is drawn. On the basis of the dispersive analysis conclusions about a ratio of a rigidnost of teachers and a rigidnost of the being trained are drawn; communication of a rigidnost of subjects of education and the accommodation district (city/village), steps of education (school-college-higher education institution) is investigated. The technique acted as diagnostic tools "A Tomsk questionnaire of a rigidnost of G.V.Zalevsky" (TORZ). This technique allows to draw a conclusion not only on a rigidnost of the person, but also to analyse its compound components. As a whole the analysis is carried out on 8 scales: 1 . Scale of the general rigidnost; 2 . Subscale of an actual rigidnost; 3 . Scale of a sensitive rigidnost; 4 . Scale of an adjusting rigidnost. 5 . Rigidnost scale as states. 6 . Scale of a premorbidny rigidnost. 7 . Reality scale. 8 . Lie scale. Empirical research of a rigidnost of subjects of education allows to draw the following conclusions:1 . On all components of a rigidnost (TORZ) significant distinctions are received. In particular, at teachers level of a rigidnost is higher on four components (from six): general rigidnost (000); actual rigidnost (000); sensitive rigidnost (010); rigidnost as state (000).2 . The Rigidnost of subjects of education isn't connected with the district of their accommodation (city/village).3 . The hypothesis that "the rigidnost of graduates of educational institutions isn't connected with a step of education (school-college-higher education institution)" received confirmation partially. That is, statistically significant distinctions between selections were shown on scales: sensitive rigidnost (043); premorbidny rigidnost (017). Thus, selection "school students" on all scales showed the lowest points on rigidnost components. That on the one hand it is possible to characterize positively: school students are most open for the changes happening in their life. On the other hand, raises a question of influence of post-secondary education on formation of the fixed forms of behavior.Thus it should be noted that this analysis is considered as primary. The received results have to be put in a formulation of the following hypotheses, so and research continuation. Declared system approach demands the analysis of a phenomenon of openness in system of the interconnected features of the person, as allows to come nearer, in particular, to disclosure "the nature and mechanisms of innovative behavior" that is especially important in an education system.

Keywords: system, openness, closedness, ridigity, innovation, subject of education, analysis of variance, innovation, teacher, student
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Zalevskii G.V. Fiksirovannye formy povedeniya individual'nykh i gruppovykh sistem (v kul'ture, obrazovanii, nauke, norme i patologii). – M.: Tomsk, Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2004. – 460 s.
2.
Klochko V.E., Galazhinskii E.V. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya Nauchnoe izdanie.-Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2009.-240 s.
3.
Lavrent'ev G.V., Lavrent'eva N.B. Innovatsionnye obuchayushchie tekhnologii v professional'noi podgotovke spetsialistov. Barnaul: Altaiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. – 2002. – 148 s.
4.
Slobodchikov V.I. Innovatsii v obrazovanii: osnovaniya i smysl [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.abitu.ru/researcher/methodics/nauka/a_1xizkd.html. Data obrashcheniya: 21.07.2014.
5.
V.G. Budanov, E.M. Soroko, I.A. Aseeva Innovatsionnye tekhnologii v obrazovatel'nykh sredakh na osnove samoorganizatsii studenchesko- prepodavatel'skogo soobshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 12. - C. 104 - 109.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website