Статья 'Гендерные представления о семье у поколения z: кросс-культурный анализ' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru

 

 

Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Generation Z' Gender-Based Representations of Family: Cross-Cultural Analysis

Voroncova Yuliya

Master of the Department of Labour Psychology and Psychological Counseling at Moscow State Pedagogical University

127051, Russia, g. Moscow, per. Malyi Sukharevskii, 6

jl.voroncova@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Ermolaev Victor Vladimirovich

PhD in Psychology

associate professor of the Department of General, Developmental and Pedagogical Psychology at Sholokhov Moscow State University for Humanities

109444, Russia, Moscow, str. Tashkentskaya, 18 ap. 4

evv21@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8701.2016.3.19518

Review date:

19-06-2016


Publish date:

25-06-2016


Abstract.

Object of research is gender ideas of the future family at the Russian and Lithuanian seniors as representatives of generation of Z. Authors in detail consider such aspects of a subject as polorolevy aspect of family life, continuously growing tendency to increase in number of incomplete families, as a result of numerous rastorzheniye of marriages, proving by that relevance of studying of a problem of transformation of institute of a family. The special attention is paid by authors to representations of the Russian and Lithuanian seniors as representatives of digital generation about the future family, to ethical standards and the level of subjective control, their balance in system of social representations.And the level of subjective control at digital generation were applied to research of content of ideas of future family and expressiveness of ethical standards: technique of stereometric testing (Garber E. I., V. V. Kozacha); express technique of an assessment of the relation to observance of ethical standards (Kupreychenko A. B.); test questionnaire level of subjective control (E. F. Bazhin, E. A. Golykina, A. M. Etkind). It is carried out cross-country - cultural research of ideas of the future family of the Russian and Lithuanian seniors as representatives of generation of Z. The following conclusions have been formulated: distinctions are found in representatives of generation of Z between ideas of future family, ethical standards and level of subjective control of the Russian and Lithuanian school students.

Keywords: external locus control level, divorce, marriage, family relations, gender, Generation Z, digital generation, family, moral standards, representations
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Abul'khanova–Slavskaya K.A. Rossiiskii mentalitet: kross-kul'turnyi i tipologicheskii podkhody // Rossiiskii mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoi teorii i praktiki. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 1997. 336 s.
2.
Avdulova T.P. Tendentsii sotsializatsii podrostkov v kontekste informatsionnykh predpochtenii [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. №6(20). S. 8. URL: http://psystudy.ru
3.
Andreeva G. M. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya v sovremennom mire / G. M. Andreeva, A. I. Dontsov. M.: Prosveshchenie, 2012. 456 s.
4.
Andreeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial'nogo poznaniya. M.: Aspekt Press, 2009. 303 s.
5.
Antonov A. I. Mikrosotsiologiya sem'i. M.: INFRA-M, 2005. 640 s.
6.
Bobneva M.I., Dorofeev E.D. Izmenenie tsennostnykh sistem lichnosti v period preobrazovaniya obshchestva // Tsennostnoe soznanie lich¬nosti v period preobrazovaniya obshchestva / Pod red. E.D. Dorofeeva, L.A Sedova. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 1997. S. 32–46.
7.
Vorontsova Yu., Ermolaev V.V. Predstavleniya «pokoleniya Z» o svoei budushchei sem'e (na primere litovskikh starsheklassnikov) // Psikholog. 2016. № 1. S. 1-12.
8.
Vygotskii L.S. Myshlenie i rech'. M.: AST, 2011. 640 s.
9.
Garanina E.Yu. Sem'evedenie [Elektronnyi resurs]: uch. posobie / E.Yu. Garanina, N.A. Konopleva, S.F. Karabanova. 2-e izd., ster. M.: FLINTA, 2013. 384 s.
10.
Golod S.I., Sem'ya i brak: istoriko-sotsiologicheskii analiz. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. 117 s.
11.
Dontsov A.I., Emel'yanova T.P. Kontseptsiya sotsial'nykh predstavlenii v sovremennoi frantsuzskoi psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. 1984. № 1. S. 147-152.
12.
Dyurkgeim E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie / per. s frants., sostavl., vstup. st. i primech. A. B. Gofmana. M.: Kanon, 1995. 3-e izdanie, dop. i ispr. M.: TERRA – Knizhnyi klub, 2008. 400 s. (S. 23–58)
13.
Ermolaev V.V., Vorontsova Yu. Sem'ya v predstavleniyakh litovskikh starsheklassnikov pokoleniya Z // Materialy Chetvertoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Sotsial'nyi komp'yuting: osnovy, tekhnologii razvitiya, sotsial'no-gumanitarnye effekty»: (ISC-15): Sbornik statei i tezisov [Elektronnoe izdanie] / Otv. red. Brodovskaya E. V. M.: MPGU, 2015. S. 193–196.
14.
Ermolaev V.V., Ferapontova M.V. Otnoshenie pokoleniya Z k nravstvennym normam // Materialy Chetvertoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Sotsial'nyi komp'yuting: osnovy, tekhnologii razvitiya, sotsial'no-gumanitarnye effekty»: (ISC-15): Sbornik statei i tezisov [Elektronnoe izdanie] / Otv. red. Brodovskaya E. V. M.: MPGU, 2015. S. 202–207.
15.
Zider R. Sotsial'naya istoriya v Zapadnoi i Tsentral'noi Evrope (konets XVIII-KhKh v.). M.: .VLADOS, 1997. 301 s.
16.
Karneev R.K., Merzlyakova S.V. Maskulinnost'-femininnost' lichnosti kak faktor razvitiya tsennosti sem'i sovremennoi molodezhi // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 1. S. 216–221.
17.
Kuz'mina L.M. Raspredelenie rolei v molodoi sem'e // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. 2011. № 3(69). C. 77–89.
18.
Kupreichenko A. B., Vorob'eva A. E. Nravstvennoe samoopredelenie molodezhi. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2013. S. 8.
19.
Leont'ev D.A. Otvetsvennost' // Psikhologicheskii slovar': v 6 t. / red.–sost. L.A. Karpenko; pod obshch. red. A.V. Petrovskogo. M.: PER SE, 2006. 176 s.
20.
Malenova A. Yu., Samoilenkova A. V. Predstavleniya o brachno-semeinykh otnosheniyakh studencheskoi molodezhi: sotsial'no–psikhologicheskie riski i resursy // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2014. № 1. S. 43–51.
21.
Minkina N.A. Vospitanie otvetstvennost'yu. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 143 s.
22.
Moskovichi S. Ot kollektivnykh predstavlenii k sotsial'nym (k istorii odnogo ponyatiya) // Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. № 2. S. 83–95.
23.
Moskovichi S. Sotsial'nye predstavleniya: istoricheskii vzglyad // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1995. T. 16. № 1. S. 3–18.
24.
Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti. L.: Nauka, 1983. 325 s.
25.
Myasishchev V. N. Psikhologiya otnoshenii: Izbrvnnye psikhologicheskie trudy. M.: In-t prakt. Psikh.; Voronezh–Modek, 1995. S. 68—72
26.
Nikolaeva E. S. K voprosu o psikhologicheskikh osobennostyakh pokoleniya Z // Problemnoe pole sovremennoi sem'i: materialy I mezhdunar. Nauchno–prakt. konf., MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhova, 18—19 iyunya 2015 g. / Otv. red. M. I. Rozenova, V.V. Ermolaev, E.V. Likhacheva. M.: Diona, 2015. S. 151—155.
27.
Orlova V. V. Nravstvennyi Vybor Sovremennoi Molodezhi: Idealy i Real'nost' // Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2010. T. 316. № 6. S. 166–172.
28.
Palfri Dzh., Gasser U. Deti tsifrovoi ery. M.: Eksmo, 2011. 368 s.
29.
Psikhologicheskie problemy sotsial'noi regulyatsii povedeniya / Pod red. E. V. Shorokhovoi, M. I. Bobnevoi. M.: Nauka, 1976. 365 s.
30.
Rossiiskii mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoi teorii i praktiki / Pod red. Abul'khanovoi K.A., A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volikovoi. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 1997. 336 s.
31.
Rubinshtein S.L. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii. SPb.: Piter, 2015. 718 s.
32.
Sapa A. V. Pokolenie Z — pokolenie epokhi FGOS // Innovatsionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. 2014. № 2. S. 24–30.
33.
Safronova Zh.S. Faktory, opredelyayushchie formirovanie nravstvennoi osnovy lichnosti // Psikhologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya. 2009. № 5(2). S. 84–86.
34.
Sorokoumova E.A., Nikolaeva E.S. Pokolenie Z v protsesse samopoznaniya // Materialy Chetvertoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Sotsial'nyi komp'yuting: osnovy, tekhnologii razvitiya, sotsial'no-gumanitarnye effekty»: (ISC-15): Sbornik statei i tezisov [Elektronnoe izdanie] / Otv. red. Brodovskaya E.V. M.: MPGU, 2015. S. 193–196.
35.
Kharchev A. G. Brak i sem'ya v SSSR / A. G. Kharchev. 2–e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Mysl', 1979. 365 s.
36.
Tsifrovaya gramotnost' i bezopasnost' v Internete: metodicheskoe posobie dlya spetsialistov osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya / G. Soldatova, E. Zotova, M. Lebesheva, V. Shlyapnikov. M.: Google, 2013. 311 s.
37.
Shneider L.B. Sem'ya. Oglyadyvayas' vpered. SPb.: Piter, 2013. 368 s.
38.
Abric J-C. A structural approach to social representations // Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions/ Eds. by K.Deaux, G.Philogene. L.: Oxford, 2001. P. 42–43.
39.
Moscovici S. On Social representations // Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding / Ed. by H.J. Forgas. L. 1981, P. 181-209.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website