Отраженные установки на черты личности как предиктор успеваемости студентов

Щебетенко Сергей Александрович

doi:10.7256/2454-0722.2015.1.13526


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics

Reference:

Shchebetenko S. // Psychology and Psychotechnics. 2015. № 1. P. 70-82. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2015.1.13526 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13526

Отраженные установки на черты личности как предиктор успеваемости студентов

Shchebetenko Sergei

PhD in Psychology

associate professor, senior researcher of the Department of Developmental Psychology at Perm State University

614990, Russia, Permskii krai, g. Perm', ul. Bukireva, 15

shebetenko@rambler.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Person and personality"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.1.13526

Received:

03-11-2014

Published:

25-02-2015

References

1. Aronson E. Obshchestvennoe zhivotnoe. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu psikhologiyu. M: Aspekt-Press, 1998. 517 c.
2. Vygotskii L.S., Luriya A.R. Etyudy po istorii povedeniya: Obez'yana. Primitiv. Rebenok. M: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 224 c.
3. Dorfman L.Ya. Metaindividual'nyi mir. M: Smysl, 1993. 456 c.
4. Dorfman L.Ya. Kontseptsiya metaindividual'nogo mira: sovremennoe sostoyanie. // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki. 2006. T. 3. № 3. S. 3–34.
5. Kochergina E.V., Nai D., Orel E.A. Faktory «Bol'shoi pyaterki» kak psikhologicheskie prediktory akademicheskoi uspevaemosti studentov vuzov // Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013. T.
6. № 27. 6. Merlin V.S. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Pedagogika, 1986. 253 c.
7. Pervin L., Dzhon O. Psikhologiya lichnosti: Teoriya i issledovaniya. M: Aspekt-Press, 2001. 607 s.
8. Shchebetenko S.A. (neopubl.). Metakognitivnye kharakternye adaptatsii.
9. Shchebetenko S.A. Ustanovki na cherty lichnosti v kontekste Bol'shoi Pyaterki // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, v pechati.
10. Shchebetenko S.A., Tyutikova E.A. «Kartina khorosha, potomu chto khorosha otkrytost' opytu»: oposreduyushchaya rol' ustanovok na cherty v individual'nykh razlichiyakh otnosheniya k zhivopisi // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, v pechati.
11. Allik, J., & Realo, A. (1997). Intelligence, academic abilities, and personality. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 809–814.
12. Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity: cultural change and the struggle for self. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
13. Cook, W. L., & Douglas, E. M. (1998). The looking-glass self in family context: A social relations analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(3), 299–309.
14. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
15. DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828.
16. Farmer, S. M., & Van Dyne, L. (2010). The idealized self and the situated self as pre-dictors of employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 503–516.
17. Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Volume 4: The self in social perspective. Psychology Press.
18. Gillespie, A. (2012). Position exchange: The social development of agency. New Ide-as in Psychology, 30(1), 32–46.
19. Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., Donnellan, M. B., Samuel, D. B., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … Skodol, A. E. (2013). Ten year rank-order stability of personality traits and disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 335–344.
20. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Digireads.com Publishing.
21. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
22. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Rob-ins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An ex-pansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154.
24. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 145–161.
25. Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research (Vol. vii). Oxford, England: Springer.
26. Löckenhoff, C. E., Terracciano, A., Ferrucci, L., & Costa, P. T. (2012). Five-factor personality traits and age trajectories of self-rated health: The role of question framing. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 375–401.
27. Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Inter-personal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 390–398.
28. Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relat-ing the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Inte-grative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(3), 252–272.
29. McAbee, S. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta-analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 532–544.
30. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford Press.
31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2013). Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In T. A. Widiger, P. T. Costa, & Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed.) (pp. 15–27). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
32. Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. (A. E. Murphy, Ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
33. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behav-iorist. University of Chicago Press.
34. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The history of attitudes and persuasion research. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 285–320). New York: Psychology Press.
35. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and ac-ademic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
36. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of univer-sity students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bul-letin, 138(2), 353–387.
37. Shchebetenko, S., & Bergfeld, A. Y. (unpublished manuscript). Reflected personality traits and attitudes toward personality as metacognitive characteristic adaptations that contribute to academic achievement in Russian universities.
38. Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549–573.
39. Slobodskaya, H. R. (2007). The associations among the Big Five, behavioural inhibi-tion and behavioural approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia. Personali-ty and Individual Differences, 43(4), 913–924.
40. Sutin, A. R. (2008). Autobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiograph-ical memory mediates basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 1060–1066.
41. Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). Guilford Press.
42. Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J.-O. W., & Schuler, H. (2007). Meta-analysis of the re-lationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 132–151.
43. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. SAGE.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.