Статья 'Потаенность как небытие бытийного/бытие небытийного' - журнал 'Психология и Психотехника' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Потаенность как небытие бытийного/бытие небытийного

Iakovleva Elena

professor of the Department of Philosophy and Socio-Political Disciplines at Institute of Economics, Management and Law (Kazan)

420111, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan', ul. Moskovskaya, 42

mifoigra@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.5.15201

Received:

04-05-2015


Published:

09-07-2015


Abstract: The subject of the research is the component of the subjective life of the person presented in the form of the hidden. The complexity of the analysis is due to the fact that a secret as something that exists in everyone's life is deliberately hidden: a secret can be a powerful source for personality development but at the same time be hidden and carefully controlled. Only an individual himself can perform 'pro-of-knowledge' and partially or fully withdraw his secrets from the subjective sphere into the objective sphere where they stop being secrets. He can also keep a secret to/in himself. According to the author, even partial disclosure of the hidden still leaves the room for exploration and interpretation from the point of view of another subjectivity. Based on the results of the analysis, the author creates a classification of the hidden as the existential nothingness (secret-in-itself), existence of nothing (secret-out-of-itself) and the transition between them (secret-from-itself). The problem is viewed by the author in the form of a narrative description using dialectical and phenomenological methods and the principle of intentional analysis that helps to reveal partiular features of this psychic phenomenon. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the researcher analyzes a complex psychic phenomenon and offers a classification of different types of this phenomenon in terms of individual existence.  Terms and findings of the research can be used when working with people as well as interpreting various kinds of texts and writing psychological profiles. 


Keywords:

incomprehensible, nothingness, non-existence, secret, the hidden, existential nothingness / secret-in-itself, secret-from-itself, existence of nothing / secret-out-of-itself, il y a, posture, pro-of-knowledge, original

References
1. Sartr Zh.-P.Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii. M.: AST, 2009. 925 s.
2. Kolyadko V.I. Predislovie// Zh.-P. Sartr. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii. M.: AST, 2009. S. 5-28.
3. Frank S.L. Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu religii //S. Frank. Sochineniya. M.: Pravda, 1990. 608 s.
4. Levinas E. Izbrannoe: total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.-SPb.: TsGNII INION RAN, 2000. 409 s.
5. Melikh Yu. B. Lichnost', lik, lik drugogo: opyt neobychnogo istoriko-filosofskogo sopostavleniya (Levinas, Kirkegor, Florenskii, Karsavin) / Sushchnost' i Slovo. Sbornik nauchnykh statei k yubileyu professora N.V. Motroshilovoi. M.: Fenomenologiya–Germenevtika. 2009. S. 551-571.
6. Khaidegger M. Vopros o tekhnike// M. Khaidegger. Vremya i bytie. M., 1993. S.221-238.
7. Markov B.V. Znaki bytiya. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 562 s.
8. D.L. Rodzinskii Rol' svobody i znanii
v dostizhenii chelovekom sostoyaniya
nebytiistvennogo sovershenstva. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 11. - C. 36 - 42.

9. Shugurov M.V. Sootnoshenie smysla i nebytiya v antropologicheskoi ontogermenevtike: kul'turo-filosofskie proektsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1353 - 1367. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.10.9473.
10. Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 102. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.5.284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.