Психологизм как логико-методологическая проблема: исторические корни в русской философии начала XX века и современное значение

Попова Варвара Сергеевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0722.2015.6.15508


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics

Reference:

Popova V.S. Psychologism as the Logical and Methodological Issue: Historical Origin in Russian Philosophy of the Beginning of the XXth Century and Contemporary Meaning // Psychology and Psychotechnics. 2015. № 6. P. 570-578. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2015.6.15508 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15508

Психологизм как логико-методологическая проблема: исторические корни в русской философии начала XX века и современное значение

Popova Varvara Sergeevna

PhD in Philosophy

associate professor of the Department of Philosophy at Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

236041, Russia, Kaliningradskaya oblast', g. Kaliningrad, ul. Aleksandra Nevskogo, 14

varyud@mail.ru

Article was published in rubric "Philosophy and psychology"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.6.15508

Received:

08-06-2015

Published:

30-07-2015

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of psychologism in terms of logic. Psychologism is viewed with reference to logical and methodological researches of some Russian philosophers of the XIX-XX centuries as well as foreign researches of this issue (Vladislavlev-Mill, Vedensky-Lossky, Shpet-Sigwart-Wundt). The importance of the psychologism paradigm is expressed in several logical and methodological tendencies (importance of the empiric subject of cognition in modern humanitarian epistemology; contemporary convergence of logic, argumentorics, cognitive science and researches of artificial intelligence; and a growing role of informal logic and its approaches to the analysis of argumentation). Examination of psychologism problem in various philosophical systems is very significant from the viewpoint of the humanitarian epistemology development and humanitarian discipline evolution. The author also describes debates on the demarcation of logical and psychological phenomena. Today's epistemological approaches (for example, cultural and historical methodology) emphasize the importance of the dialogue between different aspects of research and the eternal nature of questions about the subject of science (logic, psychology and philosophy). The author treats cultural and historical approach as the most effective for contemporary psychologism problem research.

Keywords:

logic, psychology, psychologism, metapsychologism, epistemological style, logical and methodological tendencies, cultural and historical approach, Mikhail Vladislavlev, Alexander Vvedenskiy, Nikolay Losskiy

References

1. Bazhanov V.A. Prervannyi polet. Istoriya «universitetskoi» filosofii i logiki v Rossii.-M.: Izdatel'stvo MGU, 1995.
2. Bazhanov V.A. Psikhologizm / Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki http://www.enc-dic.com/enc_epist/Psihologizm-i-antipsihologizm-579.html Data obrashcheniya: 08.06.2015.
3. Bryushinkin V.N. Antropologicheskie izmereniya logiki // Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Immanuila Kanta. Vyp. 6: Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki.-Kaliningrad, 2006. S. 6-11.
4. Bryushinkin V.N. Logika. Myshlenie. Informatsiya.-L., 1988.
5. Bryushinkin V.N. Psikhologizm na poroge XXI veka // Logicheskoe kantovedenie – 4: Trudy mezhdunarodnogo seminara.-Kaliningrad, 1998.
6. Vasilyuk F.E., Zinchenko V.P., Meshcheryakov B.G., Petrovskii V.A., Pruzhinin B.I., Shchedrina T.G. Metodologiya psikhologii: problemy i perspektivy.-M.; SPb., 2012.
7. Vvedenskii A.I. Logika, kak chast' teorii poznaniya.-Pg., 1917.
8. Vladislavlev M.I. Soobrazheniya i proekt uchebnogo plana dlya istoriko-filologicheskogo fakul'teta.-SPb., 1889.
9. Vladislavlev M. I. Uchebnik logiki. Izdanie 4-oe.-M., 1905.
10. Griftsova I.N. Neformal'naya logika kak prakticheskaya logika // Transtsendental'naya antropologiya i logika.-Kaliningrad, 2000.
11. Griftsova I. N. Sootnoshenie formal'noi i neformal'noi logiki : Filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz. — M., 1999.
12. Griftsova I.N. Teoreticheskaya i prakticheskaya logika v issledovaniyakh russkikh logikov // Nauchnaya konferentsiya «Sovremennaya logika: problemy teorii, istorii i primeneniya v nauke» 19-21 iyunya 1996 goda. Tezisy dokladov. Sankt-Peterburg, 1996.
13. Griftsova I.N., Sorina G.V. Gumanitarnoe obosnovanie logiki: problemy i podkhody // Gumanitarnaya nauka v Rossii: Sorosovskie laureaty. Vyp. Psikhologiya. Filosofiya.-M., 1996.
14. Grot N.Ya. K voprosu ob istinnykh zadachakh filosofii // Grot N.Ya. Filosofiya i ee obshchie zadachi. Sbornik statei.-SPb., 1904. S. 122-146.
15. Grot N.Ya. O napravlenii i zadachakh moei filosofii // Grot N.Ya. Filosofiya i ee obshchie zadachi. Sbornik statei.-SPb., 1904. S. 146-161
16. Zigvart X. Logika. T. 1. Uchenie o suzhdenii, ponyatii i vyvode / Per. s nem. I.A. Davydova. — M., 2008.
17. Lopatin L.M. Filosofskie vzglyady V.Ya. Tsingera. // Lopatin L.M. Filosofskie kharakteristiki i rechi.-M., 1995.
18. Losskii N. O. Izbrannoe.-M., 1991.
19. Losskii N.O. Logika. Chast' vtoraya. Pg., 1922.
20. Molchanov V. Pozitsii i predposylki. Teoriya znaniya N. O. Losskogo i fenomenologiya // Logos 2010. № 5 (78). S. 22-42.
21. Polozhitel'naya logika D.S. Millya. Ee osnovnye nachala i nauchnaya postanovka. Obshchedostupnoe izlozhenie pod red. A.P. Fedorova.-SPb., 1898.
22. Porus V.N. Metodologicheskie vyzovy psikhologii (razmyshleniya o knige) // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 11. S. 52-62. Tsit. po: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1046&Itemid=52 Data obrashcheniya: 3.06.2015
23. Sorina G.V. Proekt «psikhologizm-antipsikhologizm» v metateoreticheskom kontekste // Ratsio.ru. 2012. № 8. S. 20-45.
24. Khomenko I.V. Neformal'nye issledovaniya v teorii argumentatsii: problema klassifikatsii. // Modeli rassuzhdenii – 2: Argumentatsiya i ratsional'nost'.-Kaliningrad, 2008. S. 50-62.
25. Chelpanov G.I. Psikhologiya. Osnovnoi kurs, chitannyi v Moskovskom universitete v 1908 – 1909 gg. M., 1909.
26. Shpet G.G. Istoriya kak problema logiki. Chast' pervaya. Materialy. Otv. red.-sost. T.G. Shchedrina.-M.; SPb., 2014.
27. Shpet G.G. Odin put' psikhologii i kuda on vedet. // Shpet G.G. Philosophia Natalis. Izbrannye psikhologo-pedagogicheskie trudy. Otv. redaktor-sostavitel' T.G. Shchedrina.-M., 2006.
28. Epistemologicheskii stil' v russkoi intellektual'noi kul'ture XIX-XX vekov: ot lichnosti k traditsii. Kollektivnaya monografiya. Pod red. B.I. Puzhinina i T.G. Shchedrinoi.-M., 2013.
29. Johnson R. H. Making Sense of “Informal Logic // Informal Logic. 2006. VOL. 26. N. 3. R. 231-258.
30. Kusch M. Psychologism. A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London / New York: Routledge, 1995.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.