Статья 'Реальность в ретроспективе' - журнал 'Психология и Психотехника' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Реальность в ретроспективе

Suetin Trifon

student of the Department of Depth Psychology at Institute of Psychoanalysis and Social Management

125009, Russia, Mo oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Tverskaya, 31/4

suetin_trifon@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2016.3.18880

Received:

20-04-2016


Published:

29-06-2016


Abstract: In his article Suetin describes the relationship between views on reality and development of science till the moment when classical science was created. The author analyzes idea of ancient and medieval philosophers as well as philosophers and scientists of the Modern Age comparing these ideas to the vector of scientific development. The author of the article also touches upon the question about the influence of religion and church and associated lifestyle on the development of classical science. In general, science is viewed as an essential instrument for understanding the reality, however, the classical variant of scientific tendencies is gradually shifting towards pragmatism and adoption of reality to human and society. The research is based, first of all, on ancient philosophy and religious philosophy as well a shistory and philosophy of science. Taking into account constructive factors of classical science, the author of the article analyzes the reasons and consequences of the negative tendencies of science. According to the author, the main problem of classical science is the excess rationalization and ignoration of the sensual-emotional factor and reflexion. Views on the reality do not encourage science any more but rather create obstacles for scientific development. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author views science from the point of vie wof emotional and sensual reflexion. According to the author, without taking into account emotional and sensual perception of the world, science cannot perceive the reality as it is but can only provide means of pragmatic use of the reality.   


Keywords:

reality, science, history, progress, world view, ontology, society, rationality, pragmatism, demarcation of science

References
1. Avgustin Blazhennyi «Ob istinnoi religii. Teologicheskii traktat». Mn.: Kharvest, 1999. 1600 s.
2. Aristotel'. Metafizika / Per. A.V. Kubitskii. M.: Eksmo, 2006. 608 s.
3. Aristotel'. O dushe / Seriya Velikie mysliteli. M.: Mir knigi, 2009. 400 s.
4. Aristotel'. Fizika / Per. V. Karpov. M.: KomKniga, 2014. 230 s.
5. Berdyaev N. Dukh i real'nost'. M.: Ast, 2006. 384 s.
6. Geraklit Efesskii. Vse nasledie. M.: Ad Marginem, 2012. 350 s.
7. Platon. Gosudarstvo. M.: Nauka, 2005. 576 s.
8. Tatarkevich V. Istoriya filosofii. Antichnaya i srednevekovaya filosofiya. M.: Izd-vo Permskogo universiteta, 2000. 482 s.
9. Yum D. Issledovanie o chelovecheskom razumenii / Per. S.I. Tsereteli. M.: Progress, 1995. 240 S.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.