Статья 'Некоторые психометрические характеристики личностного опросника оценки надёжности водителя' - журнал 'Психология и Психотехника' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Некоторые психометрические характеристики личностного опросника оценки надёжности водителя

Petrov Vladislav Evgen'evich

PhD in Psychology

Senior Scientific Associate at the Scientific Research Centre for Traffic Safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

121170, Russia, Moscow, ul. Poklonnaya, 17

v.e.petrov@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Abasov Magomedrasul Mukhtarovich

Regimental Commander at Training and Career Development Courses, the All-Russian Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

142006, Russia, Domodedovo, Mkr.Vostryakovo, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 21

abasov.dag@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2016.5.19652

Received:

05-07-2016


Published:

18-09-2016


Abstract: The article is devoted to increasing safety of the road traffic through implementing preventive psychological diagnostics of the driver's disposition for aggressive (dangerous) driving. The object of the research is the personality inventory aimed at assessing the driver's reliablity as well as whether the inventory can predict the driver's style of driving. The subject of the research is construct validity as a psychometric characteristic of the inventory. It is the characteristic that defines the quality (i.e. accuracy) of studying this or that individual psychological trait. For this reason, the authors have conducted the psychometric research of validity based on comparison of obtained results with inventory indicators which served as the standard (basis) for evaluation. The basic research methods combined diffedrent diagnostic methods (tests) and methods of mathematical and statistical data processing. The following tests and inventories have been used: Californian psychological inventory, Willed self-control inventory (offered by A. Zverkov and E. Eidman), Risk liability inventory (A. Shmelev), John Taylor's personal anxiety inventory, Five-factor questionnaire, Self-assertiveness Strategy Inventory (offered by A. Nikitin and N. Kharlamenkova) and BPAQ questionnaire. Comparitive correlation analysis of the diagnostic scales of the Driver's realiablity inventory with relevant indictors of the aforesaid seven tests has allowed to make a conclusion about the construct validity and good psychometric characteristics of the Inventory. The scientific novelty of the research is casused by the fact that the authors have tested a new innovative method of preventive dianogistics of the driver's disposition towards aggressive (dangeous) driving. Such analysis of personal traits of acting and future drivers allows to assist them with psychological help if necessary, to improve their style of driving and, finally, to increase the safety of road traffic. The results of the research also show that the Inventory can be used not only for drivers but also for internal affairs officers. 


Keywords:

driver's realibility inventory, deviation behavior, aggressive driving, dangerous driving, Road Patrol Service of the Main Directorate for Ro, anxiety manifestation scale, validity, delinquency, anxiety, psychometric characteristics

References
1. Petrov V.E. Metodika psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki nadezhnosti voditelya po upravleniyu transportnym sredstvom // Vestnik VIPK MVD Rossii. Domodedovo, 2015. № 4 (36). S. 91-96.
2. Petrov V.E. Osobennosti interpretatsii psikhodiagnosticheskikh dannykh lichnostnogo oprosnika otsenki nadezhnosti voditelya // Nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal «Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii». M., 2016. № 3 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/03/65740 (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2016).
3. Petrov V.E., Kokurin A.V., Kokurina I.V. O lichnostnom oprosnike psikhologicheskoi otsenki nadezhnosti voditelya // Novaya nauka: strategii i vektory razvitiya: po mat. mezhd. nauchno-prakt. konf., ch. 3 v 3-kh chastyakh. Sterlitamak, 2016. S. 73-75.
4. Tarabrina N.V., Grafinina N.A. Novyi variant Kaliforniiskogo psikhologicheskogo oprosnika // Metodiki analiza i kontrolya trudovoi deyatel'nosti i funktsional'nykh sostoyanii. M., 1992. S. 250-261.
5. Petrov V.E., Smetanina N.V. Kaliforniiskii psikhologicheskii oprosnik: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. M.: Gruppa ABSOLYuT, 2010. 120 s.
6. Zverkov A.G., Eidman E.V. Diagnostika volevogo samokontrolya: oprosnik VSK // Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnostika motivatsii i samoregulyatsii / Pod red. S.R. Pantileeva. M.: MGU, 1990. S. 116-126.
7. Shmelev A.G. Diagnostika sklonnosti k risku // Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnostika motivatsii i samoregulyatsii / Pod red. S.R. Pantileeva. M.: MGU, 1990. S. 129-138.
8. Lichnostnaya shkala proyavlenii trevogi (Dzh. Teilor, adaptatsiya T.A. Nemchina) / Diagnostika emotsional'no-nravstvennogo razvitiya // Red. i sost. I.B. Dermanova. SPb.: Piter, 2002. S. 126-128.
9. Costa P., McCrae R. Multiple uses for longitudinal personality data // European Journal of Personality, 1992. Vol. 6, p. 85-102.
10. Orel V.E., Rukavishnikov A.A., Senin I.G. Opyt adaptatsii metodiki diagnostiki lichnostnykh kharakteristik / Psikhologicheskii pul's Yaroslavlya. Yaroslavl', 1998. S. 222-233
11. Petrov V.E. Pyatifaktornyi lichnostnyi oprosnik v sovremennoi psikhodiagnosticheskoi praktike: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. M.: Gruppa ABSOLYuT, 2008. 48 s.
12. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii, 2002. S. 288-293.
13. Enikolopov S.N., Tsibul'skii N.P. Metodiki diagnostiki agressii // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2007. № 3. S. 41-72.
14. Berkovits L. Agressiya: prichiny, posledstviya i kontrol'. M.: Praim-Evroznak, 2001. 516 s.
15. Ermolaev V.V., Makushina O.P., Chetverikova A.I. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie determinanty proyavleniya agressii voditelyami passazhirskogo transporta na rossiiskikh dorogakh // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2013. № 2. C. 108-118.
16. Ermolaev V.V., Chetverikova A.I. K voprosu o kriteriyakh professional'no-psikhologicheskogo otbora voditelei // Vestnik MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhova. Psikhologiya i pedagogika. 2014. № 2. S. 105-112.
17. Kozlov E.V. Psikhofiziologicheskoe obosnovanie neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya sistemy podgotovki voditelei: avtoref. dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M., 2012. 24 s.
18. Lobanova Yu.I. Stil' vozhdeniya: opredelyayushchie faktory, kharakteristiki, napravleniya optimizatsii // Rossiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal. 2015. T. 4. № 1. S. 76-84.
19. A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm ob ideal'noi sovokupnosti prestuplenii // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.