Статья 'Философская культура или философская технология?' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Философская культура или философская технология?

Popkova Natal'ya Vladimirovna

professor of the Department of Philosophy, History and Social Studies at Bryansk State Technical University

241035, Russia, Bryansk Region, Bryansk, str. Bulvar 50-Letiya Oktyabrya, 7

npopkova12@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2015.2.14209

Received:

15-01-2015


Published:

25-02-2015


Abstract: In article the essence of philosophical culture, the reason of its small demand by modern mass con-sciousness and ways of an exit from crisis position are considered. The situation with a recognition of social utility of philosophy in the conditions of dominating tehnogenno-hedonistic rationality is analyzed. The place of philosophical culture within the limits of culture classical (as a source of basic principles and concepts) and cultures of a modern epoch (when the philosophy is criticised for uselessness even by scientific community) is compared. Necessity of transformation of philosophy for a modern epoch is investigated. The basic methods of research realised in work, - problematization, analogy, a methodological schematization, rationalisation and an articulation of implicit representations. On an example of position of the modern science which have passed in a stage techno-science (that means transition from a problem of understanding of an external reality to a problem of its designing, from an explanation - to reproduction). The author considers philosophy as the special technology intended for change of the world internal, and suggests to develop philosophy in a direction named techno-philosophy. Accordingly, each philosophical system is considered as set of programs of behaviour proving each other and dialogue: the basic metaphilosophical directions having different research objectives are allocated, and possibility of their interpretation as various schemes of autodesigning of the person of the philosopher is shown. As a result there is a possibility to use domination of technologically directed outlook on advantage of development of philosophy, it is convincing (for modern mentality) having proved its necessity for the individual becoming the person. Practical application of techno-philosophy will find the project at reconsideration of stages of development of philosophy and its social functions, at research of implicit or daily philosophy (ordinary representations about a life, its purpose and its rules also are technologies).


Keywords:

culture, philosophy, crisis, science, technology, techno-science, the present, outlook, rationality, designing

References
1. Andreev A.L. Tekhnonauka // Filosofiya nauki: Vypusk 16. M.: IF RAN, 2011. S.200-218.
2. Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul'tury. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 413 s.
3. Vainberg S. Mechty ob okonchatel'noi teorii. M.: LKI, 2008. 256 s.
4. Vernadskii V.I. Biosfera i noosfera. – M.: Airis-press, 2003. 576 s.
5. Gorokhov V.G. Tekhnonauka Galileo Galileya // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. №1. S.105-116.
6. Guseinov A.A. Filosofiya kak utopiya dlya kul'tury // Vestnik RFO. 2007. №4. S.38-44.
7. Guseinov A.A. Filosofiya kak eticheskii proekt // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. №5. S.16-26.
8. Kasavin I.T. Problema i kontekst. O prirode filosofskoi refleksii // Voprosy filosofii. 2004. №11. S.19-32.
9. Kutyrev V.A. Estestvennoe i iskusstvennoe: bor'ba mirov. N.Novgorod, 1994. 199 s.
10. Mironov V. «Deideologizatsiya» – novaya ideologiya? (o meste filosofii v obrazo-vanii) // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2003. №1. S.67-73.
11. Mironov V.V. Filosofiya i Slovo // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. №1. S.14-27.
12. Popkova N.V. Vvedenie v metafilosofiyu tekhniki. M.: LENAND, 2014. 336 s.
13. Popkova N.V. Filosofskaya ekologiya. M.: LIBROKOM, 2010. 328 s.
14. Rozin V.M. Ponyatiya «predmet» i «ob''ekt» (metodologicheskii analiz) // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. №12. S.85-96.
15. Rozin V.M. Tekhnika i sotsial'nost': Filosofskie razlicheniya i kontseptsii. M.:LIBROKOM, 2012. 304 s.
16. Rozin V.M. Evolyutsiya i metamorfoza ponyatiya «priroda» // Filosofiya prirody segodnya. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S.220-251.
17. Sokolov V.V. Filosofiya v istoricheskoi perspektive // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. №2. S.134-147.
18. Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. M.: Kontakt-al'fa, 1995. 384 s.
19. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 744 s.
20. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya i obrazy budushchego // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. №6. S.10-21.
21. Khoking S., Mlodinov L. Vysshii zamysel. M.: Amfora, 2012. 208 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.