Зачем нужна социология культуры

Орлова Эльна Александровна

doi:10.7256/2454-0625.2016.2.17876


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Culture and Art

Reference:

Orlova E.A. What for Do We Need Sociology of Culture? // Culture and Art. 2016. № 2. P. 172-189. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2016.2.17876 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17876

Зачем нужна социология культуры

Orlova El'na Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of Theory and History of Culture at University of Design and Technology

119034, Russia, Moscow, str. pereulok Bol'shoi Levshinsky, 8-a, ap. 20

elna.orlova@mail.ru

Article was published in rubric "Theoretical culturology and the theory of culture"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2016.2.17876

Received:

05-02-2016

Published:

20-04-2016

Abstract: The subject of the research is the factors that conditioned the development of the sociology of culture. The object of the research is the concepts and definitions of culture in social studies and cultural anthropology. The author examines such aspects of the topic as overcoming disciplinary differences, special attention to the sociocultural dynamics, transfer from the subject-object interpretation of the sociocultural reality towards intersubjective one and refusal of substantialism in culture and society. Special attention is paid to the development of the contemporary sociology of culture as a response to the cognitive paradigm shift. Analysis of the contents of the concept (definition) of culture in social studies and anthropology and dynamic analysis of the changes of the matter of social studies as a result of changes in the definition of culture are analyzed. The main contribution of the research is the statement of the demand for the modern variant of the sciology of culture. The author's contribution to the topic is the analysis of the factors that determine the development of the contemporary sociology of culture. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author views the topic in terms of the cognitive paradigm shift and as part of social studies.

Keywords:

culture, cultural anthropology, Marxism, positivism, cognitive paradigm, post-modernity, rationalism, structuralism, structural functionalism, phenomenological sociology

References

1. Rorti R. Posleslovie: pragmatizm, plyuralizm i postmodernizm-1998-Elektronnyi resurs-http//www.politizdat.ru/article/51/
2. Giddens E. Devyat' tezisov o budushchem sotsiologii // THESIS. T. 1. Vyp. 1. 1993 (Elektronnyi resurs-http://www.socioline.ru/new)
3. Kachanov Yu.L. Prostranstvo–vremya sotsial'nogo mira v poststrukturalistskoi perspektive// Neprikosnovennyi zapas. 2010. № 2(70). S. 11. http://magazines.russ./ru/nz/2/lel.html)
4. Kravchenko S.A. Sotsiologicheskoe teoretizirovanie, myshlenie i voobrazhenie v usloviyakh postmoderna-Elektronnyi resurs-http://www.isprras.ru/pics/File/postmodern/Kravchenko.pdf
5. Berger P., Luckman T. The Social Construction of Reality-New York: Doubleday, 1966. R. 12; Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium, 1995. S. 32.
6. Smith D. Sociological theory: methods of writing patriarchy / Ed. by R.A. Wallace //Feminism and Sociological Theory-Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989. P. 34.
7. Frank M. Was ist Neostructuralismus-Frankfurt am. M., 1984. R. 11.
8. Raikhman Dzh. Postmodernizm v nominalistskoi sisteme koordinat // Fle-shart. 1989. № 1. S. 50.
9. Welsch W. Postmoderne — Pluralitat als ethischer und politischer Welt. Köln, 1988. S. 23.
10. Crane D. The Sociology of Culture-Blackwell. Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, 1994. P. 1; Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft-Tubingen: Mohr. 1922. S. 13.
11. Mead G.H. Mind, Self and Society-Chicago. University of Chicago Press, 1936. P. 90.
12. Ionin L .G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. M.: Logos, 1998. S. 67; Alexander J. The Meanings of Social Life: a Cultural Sociology-N.Y., Oxford University Press. 2003. R. 123.
13. Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft-Tubingen, Mohr. 1922. S. 13.
14. Mead G.H. Mind, Self and Society-Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1936. P. 90.
15. Mankheim K. Izbrannoe: Sotsiologiya kul'tury. M.-SPb., Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. S. 256.
16. Aleksander Dzh.S. Analiticheskie debaty: Ponimanie otnositel'noi avtonomii kul'tury // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 6, № 1 2007. S. 28.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.