Ñòàòüÿ '«Ôàóñò» À. Ñîêóðîâà: àíàòîìèÿ äåìîíèçìà' - æóðíàë 'Êóëüòóðà è èñêóññòâî' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Khrenov, N. A. Sokurov’s ‘Faust’: Anatomy of Demonism

Abstract: The article is devoted to a cinematographic masterpiece caused by an attempt of a film director Alexander Sokurov to use Goethe’s brilliant worktragedy ‘Faust’ –and to tell about the most nettlesome issues of XX century related to formation of masses, mass societies and, as a consequence, group leaders and dictators. Alexander Sokurov’s film is not a screen version of Goethe’s ‘Faust’ in the traditional meaning of the word. It should seem that using Goethe’s tragedy for sharing his thoughts on modern issues must lead to superficial and vulgar interpretation of a classical writing. But Sokurov’s idea to include his new film in what he called ‘tetralogy’, i.e. a group of films devoted to famous dictators of XX century (Vladimir Lenin, Adolf Hitler and Hirohito) allowed to get a better insight into Goethe’s plot and to understand why that Goethe had such a difficult time writing that tragedy. If we try to understand the primary intentions of Goethe, we can find out the beginning of the demonism complex in Western culture that very well explains the way we perceive political leaders of XX century.


Keywords:

cultural studies, demonism, dictatorship, intertext, Faust’s culture, screen version, rationalism, postmodernism, transcendent, utopia and anti-utopia.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Anikst A. Gete i Faust. Ot zamysla k sversheniyu. M., 1983.
2. Aleksandrova N. Pervyy nemetskiy fil'm o Fauste // Getevskie chteniya. M., 2007.
3. Aysner L. Demonicheskiy ekran. M., 2010.
4. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989.
5. Veber A. Izbrannoe: Krizis evropeyskoy kul'tury. SPb., 1999.
6. Volynskiy A. Leonardo da Vinchi. Kiev, 1909.
7. Gete I. V. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: V 2 t. M., 1985.
8. Gete I. V. Sobranie sochineniy: V 10 t. M., 1978.
9. Danilevskiy N. Rossiya i Evropa. Vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k germano-romanskomu. M., 1991.
10. Zhirmunskiy V. Nemetskiy romantizm i sovremennaya mistika. SPb., 1996.
11. Zedl'mayr Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008.
12. Zimmel' G. Gete // Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe. T. 1: Filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1996.
13. Krakauer Z. Psikhologicheskaya istoriya nemetskogo kino. M., 1977.
14. Legenda o doktore Fauste. M., 1978.
15. Lotman Yu., Uspenskiy B. «Izgoy» i «izgoynichestvo» kak sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya pozitsiya v russkoy kul'ture preimushchestvenno dopetrovskogo perioda // «Svoe» i «chuzhoe» v istorii russkoy kul'tury. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. KhU. Vyp. 576: Tipologiya kul'tur. Vzaimnoe deystvie kul'tur. Tartu, 1982.
16. Lerner M. Razvitie tsivilizatsii v Amerike. T. 1–2. M., 1992.
17. Florenskiy P. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. T. 1. M., 1990.
18. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. M., 1993.
19. Ekkerman I. Razgovory s Gete v poslednie gody ego zhizni. M., 1981.
20. Epshteyn M. Faust i Petr. Tipologicheskiy analiz parallel'nykh motivov u Gete i Pushkina // Getevskie chteniya. M., 1984
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.