|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:
Smirnov, S. A.
The Conception of Creative Work
in Martin Heidegger’s
and Pavel Florensky’s Works
(Philosophic Introduction to Poetic
Anthropology)
// Culture and Art.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 336-348.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65255
Smirnov, S. A. The Conception of Creative Work
in Martin Heidegger’s
and Pavel Florensky’s Works
(Philosophic Introduction to Poetic
Anthropology)
Abstract:
The researcher analyzes the concepts of creative work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel
Florensky’s works. S. Smirnov shows that these two philosophers had rather close views on ontology.
Martin Heidegger understood the process of art creation as the idea of a man withdrawing
himself from what was ontologically hidden to the light of being. Creative work was associated with
ontology and the loss of roots and contact with ontology could turn art into the process of simple
form creation and techno into a plain posture. A man himself becomes a living bearer of a particular
form of a world, a ‘sign’ and an ‘indicator’ of such a world of creation. Florensky based his idea
of man’s creative work or ‘non-organic physicality’ on his concept of ‘organ projection’. Both philosophers
viewed creative work as a concept referring to such concepts as organ projection, Techne
and human existence and therefore intertwined art with ontology. The researcher carries out the
ontological analysis of the basic concepts in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s works and
describes the idea of creative work based on ontological grounds of the aforesaid concepts based
on such terms as Techne, posture, the hidden, the non-hidden, creative work, organ projection and
energy body. The researcher also offers a description of the genesis of a piece of work that is beyond
the scope of esthetics or art studies. The problem of creative work is posed as an ontological problem
or a problem of non-classical anthropology when a man himself becomes the organ of being and
forms his own energy body and becomes a creative work himself leaving his trace in tools, texts and
artifacts. Therefore, based on classical works, the author offers a non-classical vision of the genesis
of creative work.
Keywords:
Creative work, hidden, non-hidden, Techne, technology, energy body, personality, human, anthropology, poetic anthropology.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Veisman A.D. Grechesko-russkii slovar'. Reprint V-go izdaniya 1899 g. – M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet Yu.A.Shichalina, 1991.
2. Vygotskii L.S. Problema soznaniya. // Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochine-nii: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 156 – 167.
3. Vygotskii L.S. Problema razvitiya v strukturnoi psikhologii. // Vygot-skii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 238 – 290.
4. Dvoretskii I.Kh. Latinsko-russkii slovar'. – M.: Russkii yazyk, 1976. – 1096 s.
5. Zinchenko V.P. Ot klassicheskoi k organicheskoi psikhologii. – M., 1996. – 80 c.
6. Zinchenko V.P. Gipoteza o proiskhozhdenii ucheniya A.A.Ukhtomskogo o do-minante. // Chelovek. – 2000. – ¹ 3. – S. 5-20.
7. Platon Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. – T. 2 / Obshch. red. A.F.Loseva, V.F.Asmusa, A.A.Takho-Godi; Primech. A.F.Loseva i A.A.Takho-Godi; Per. s drevne-grech. – M.: Mysl', 1993. – 528 s.
8. Smirnov S.A. Kul'turnyi vozrast cheloveka. Filosofskoe vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2001. – 161s.
9. Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropolo-gii stikha. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2011. – 389 c.
10. Smirnov S.A. Novye identichnosti cheloveka: analiz i prognoz antropo-logicheskikh trendov. Antropologicheskii forsait. // Vestnik NGUEU. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 216-241.
11. Smirnov S.A. Vvedenie v antropopoetiku. Opyt neklassicheskogo antro-pologicheskogo diskursa. // Chelovek. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S.5-17.
12. Smirnov S.A. Struktura akta avtopoezisa. Opyt poeticheskoi antropolo-gii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. ¹ 2. – S. 171-182.
13. Ukhtomskii A.A. Izbrannye trudy. – L.: Nauka, 1978.
14. Florenskii P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1990.
15. Florenskii P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. – M.: Pravda, 1990. – 448 s.
16. Florenskii P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. // Simvol. – Parizh. – 1992. – ¹28. – S. 123-216.
17. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub''ekta: Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981 – 1982 uchebnom godu / M.Fuko; Per. s fr. A.G.Pogonyailo. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 677 s.
18. Khaidegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge: Sbornik: Per. s nem. / Pod red. A.L. Dobrokhotova. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. – 192 s.
19. Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s.
20. Khaidegger M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let. Per. s nem. / Sostavl.. perevody, vstup. st., primech. A.V.Mikhailova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s.
21. Khaidegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. s nem. E.Sagetdinova. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2010.
22. Khoruzhii S.S. K fenomenologii askezy. – M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoi li-teratury, 1998. – 352 s.
23. Khoruzhii S.S. Ocherki sinergiinoi antropologii. – M.: Institut filo-sofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2005. – 408 s.
24. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Per. Denezhkina A.V., Malinkina A.N., Filippova A.F.; Pod red. Denezhkina A.V. – M.: Izd-vo «Gno-zis», 1994. – 490 s.
25. I.V. Egorova Antropologicheskii renessans // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 8. - C. 18 - 28.
26. V.A. Kutyrev Rekonstruktsiya cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 1. - C. 61 - 66.
27. S. V. Chernov O tvorcheskom naznachenii cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 1. - C. 41 - 49.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|