Статья 'О "Миносе" и Как Лео Штраус прочел диалог "Минос"' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

О "Миносе" и Как Лео Штраус прочел диалог "Минос"

Mishurin Aleksander Nikolaevich

PhD in Politics

Researcher, Department of the History of Political Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences

119991, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 stroenie 1, kab. 411

personnalite@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.6.12227

Received:

10-07-2015


Published:

28-07-2015


Abstract: The present work consists of the two parts. The first part is the translation of Leo Strauss' article 'On the Minos', a classical example of Strauss interpretation of ancient texts. The second part is devoted to the analysis of the aforesaid work in which Strauss raised one of the most important questions of classical political philosophy - what is the law? The analysis is focused on the main aspect of legislation - public consent described by Strauss as the agreement between Socrat, the philosopher who possessed knowledge, and his nameless interlocutor who did not possess knowledge. In order to provide an insight into Strauss philosophy, the author of the article uses the method of attentive reading described by Strauss that allows to avoid superficial or trivial interpretation of the text. Leo Strauss is the philosopher who created grounds of non-conservative political ideology and is not so well known in Russia. Very few of his works have been translated into Russian and very scarcely analyzed. The question whether an agreement (i.e. law) is possible between two different types of people is quite a usual one because quite often people have to obey rules of incompetent legislators who were elected by incompetent electors. Strauss gave quite an unusual and original answe to that question. 


Keywords:

Leo Strauss, Socrates, Plato, Minos, Hipparch, Protagoras , consent, deception, politics, law

References
1. Aristotel'. Politika. M.: AST, 2005.
2. Aristofan. Oblaka // Komedii. t. 1. M.: Iskusstvo, 1983. S. 153-234.
3. Ksenofont. Vospominaniya o Sokrate // Sokraticheskie sochineniya. Kiropediya. M.: Ladomir, 2003. S. 19-167.
4. Platon. Protagor // Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 418-476.
5. Platon. Minos // Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 581-592.
6. Shtraus L. Problema Sokrata // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik 2013. M.: Kanon+, 2014. S. 214-232.
7. Strauss L. On Plato’s Symposium. Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 2001.
8. Strauss L. The argument and the action of Plato’s Laws. Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 1977.
9. Strauss L. On the Euthydemus // Studies in platonic political philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 1986. P. 67-88.
10. Strauss L. On Plato’s Apology of Socrates and Crito // Studies in platonic political philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 1986. P. 38-66.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.