Статья 'Субъект правового восприятия пространства: философский анализ' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Субъект правового восприятия пространства: философский анализ

Karpova Elena Vladimirovna

PhD in Philosophy

Karpova Elena VladimirovnaAssociate professor, G. I. Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Department of Public Law Disciplines

455000, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Magnitogorsk, ul. Lenina, 38, aud. 294

e.v.karpova@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.10.13193

Received:

02-10-2014


Published:

1-4.8-2015


Abstract: The subject of the present research is the subject of legal perception of space. In her research Karpova offers a definition of the subject of legal perception of space and analyzes peculiarities of the subject of legal perception of space from the ontological, gnoseological and axiological points of view. The thematic justification and importance of the topic are determined by the need to overcome the narrow gnoseological views on the subject prevailing in modern philosophical and legal concepts. The author attempts to create a concrete definition of the subject as the functions of a real person seen with all his diverse features, legal contacts and relations. The author has applied gnoseological, ontological and axiological approaches to the research. Karpova has also used the method of binary oppositions and the phenomenological research method. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author offers an integrated approach to studying the subject of legal perception of space. As a result of the research, the author makes the onto-gnoseological conclusion about the subject of legal perception of space as an active cognizing and acting Self endued with legal awarenes and free will. The subject of legal perception of space exists in the onto-gnoseological unity of the internal and the external, the perceiving and the perceived, in the axiological choice between the legal and illegal, as the guarantee for the ontological unity of legal existence, being ontologically united with the object of perception and gnoseologically opposed to it at the same time. 


References
1. Barabanshchikov V. A. Ontologicheskie kharakteristiki pertseptivnogo protsessa // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal.-2001.-№ 5.-S. 17-28.
2. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. – M.: Respublika, 1994.
3. Bogdanova V.O. Epistemologiya telesnosti: ot modeli «telo-protez» k modeli «telo-soznanie» // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-№ 2.-C. 9-19.
4. Degtyarev E.V., Vil'danov Kh.S., Vil'danova G.B. Rol' i znachenie refleksii v aksiologicheskom poznanii i v formirovanii sistemy tsennostei cheloveka // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2008. – № 32. – S 21-27.
5. Dzheims U. Lichnost' /Psikhologiya lichnosti. Teksty. – M., 1982.
6. Karamzin N.M. Zapiska o drevnei i novoi Rossii v ee politicheskom i grazhdanskom otnosheniyakh. Russkaya ideya: Sbornik proizvedenii russkikh myslitelei – M.: Airis-press, 2002.
7. Karpova E.V. Ob''ektivnye usloviya vospriyatiya prostranstva v filosofsko-pravovykh predstavleniyakh legizma // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-2.-C. 200-207. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.10.
8. Karpova E.V. Prostranstvo kak ob''ekt filosofsko-pravovogo vospriyatiya // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-3.-C.315-321.DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.03.7.
9. Karpova E. V. Sub''ektnyi plan sotsiokul'turnogo vospriyatiya prostranstva v filosofsko-pravovykh predstavleniyakh // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-№ 11.-S. 28-35.
10. K'erkegor S. Garmonicheskoe razvitie v chelovecheskoi lichnosti esteticheskikh i eticheskikh nachal / Naslazhdenie i dolg. – Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1998.
11. Maksimov M.A. Chelovek v sovremennom obshchestve: postmarksistskaya interpretatsiya problemy. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-№ 1.-C. 50-58.
12. Merlo-Ponti M. Oko i dukh. – M.: «Iskusstvo», 1992.
13. Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra. / Sochineniya v 2 t. – T.1. – M.: Mysl', 1990.
14. Syun'-tszy. O nebe // V mire kitaiskoi mudrosti. – M.: «Martin», 2006.
15. Khaidegger M. Pis'mo o gumanizme // Vremya i bytie. – M., 1993.
16. Tsvetkova M.V. Refleksivnye mekhanizmy sub''ektnykh otnoshenii // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-4.-C. 470-479. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.4.11864.
17. Chicherin B.N. Filosofiya prava. – M. : Tipo-litografiya tovarishchestva I.N.Kushnerev i Ko, 1900.
18. Eko Umberto. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu / perev. S ital. V.G. Reznik i A.G. Pogonyailo. – SPb.: «Simpozium», 2006.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.