Постановка проблемы интерпретации в античной философии

Пилюгина Маргарита Алексеевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.13307


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Pilyugina M. Stating the Problem of Interpretation in Ancient Philosophy // Philosophy and Culture. 2015. № 2. P. 269-279. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.13307 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13307

Постановка проблемы интерпретации в античной философии

Pilyugina Margarita

post-graduate student of the Department of Epistemology and Logic at State Academic University for Humanities

119991, Russia, Moscow, str. Volkhonka, 14/1, bld. 5, rooms No. 122-123

infinitatis@gmail.com

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Hermeneutics"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.13307

Received:

14-10-2014

Published:

31-03-2015

Abstract: In her article Pilyugina analyzes the grounds and the development of interpretation methods during ancient times. Interpretation started to develop at the earliest stage of ancient philosophy because it was closely connected with cognition and understanding. As a condition for genuine understanding, interpretation can be quite successful because it applies certain methods and techniques. The research objective is to answer the question about sources of interpretatio and development of interpretative methodology. The problem of interpetation is being viewed in terms of the development of humanitarian branches of science and philosophy. The research is based on the methodology of the historical and philosophical analysis. The author has also applied the hermeneutical method as the main approach to the analysis of interpretation. The nature of the research topic has also required to apply the multidisciplinary approach and involve researches on history of philosophy, hermeneutics, argumentation theory and philology. The author shows that this topic is very important for practical philosophy and development of this topic is caused by social and cultural factors. In its turn, the development of the problem of interpretation created particular branches of knowledge. With time those branches became independent sciences and disciplines. Most of interpretative methods and techniques started to develop in the ancient times and are successfully used today.

Keywords:

cognition, understanding, interpretation, knowledge, method, meaning, language, name, myth, argumentation

References

1. Ado P'er. Dukhovnye uprazhneniya i antichnaya filosofiya / M., SPb. Izd-vo «Stepnoi veter»; ID «Kolo», 2005. – 448 s.
2. Aristotel'. Ob istolkovanii/ Aristotel' Sochineniya v 4 tt., t. 2.-M.: Mysl'.-1978.-S. 91-117.
3. Zelinskii F.F. Ellinskaya religiya. Minsk. Ekonompress, 2003. – 330 s.
4. Kasavin I.T. Traditsii i interpretatsii: Fragmenty istoricheskoi epistemologii. Moskva – SPb., Izdatel'stvo RKhGI, 2000. – 320 s.
5. Koshkina E. G. Evolyutsiya, ili «dreif» yazyka, osnovnye tendentsii ego razvitiya (na primere leksiko-semanticheskoi sistemy) // V kn.: Sovremennyi nemetskii yazyk: sostoyanie i razvitie / Otv. red.: L. Nefedova. Vyp. 2. M. : MAKS Press, 2010. S. 18-33.
6. Kuznetsov V.G. Germenevtika i ee put' ot konkretnoi metodiki do filosofskogo napravleniya. // Logos, № 10(20), 1999. S. 43-88.
7. Losev A.F. Kommentarii k dialogu «Kratil» / Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T.1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; «Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko». 2006. – S. 602-622.
8. Mikirtumov I.B. Teoriya smysla i intensional'naya logika. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2006. – 351 s.
9. Pilyugina M.A. Ritorika i teoriya argumentatsii // Modeli rassuzhdenii – 5: Argumentatsiya, kommunikatsiya, obshchestvo. – Kaliningrad, 2012. S. 176-187.
10. Platon. Kratil/ Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta: «Izd-vo Olega Abyshko», 2006.— S. 421-502.
11. Slesinskii R. Poiski v ponimanii. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu germenevtiku. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/slesinsky_poiski_v_ponimanii.pdf
12. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2000. – 744s.
13. Torshilov D. O. Etimologiya i allegoriya v tolkovanii mifa (u dosokratikov i rannikh stoikov) // SOFIYa: Al'manakh: Vyp. 2: P. A. Florenskii i A. F. Losev: rod, mif, istoriya. Ufa: Izdatel'stvo «Zdravookhranenie Bashkortostana», 2007. S. 233-238.
14. Shul'ga E.N. Kognitivnaya germenevtika, M., IF RAN, 2002.-235 s.
15. Shul'ga E.N. Logicheskaya germenevtika o protivorechivosti filosofskikh sistem // Mysli i iskusstvo argumentatsii. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2003. S. S. 191-211.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.