Статья 'Трансформация понятия геноцид в современном обществе' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Трансформация понятия геноцид в современном обществе

Chernovitskaya Yuliya

PhD in Philosophy

Scientific Associate, sector of Philosophical Problems of Natural Science, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, Moscow, Goncharnaya Street 12, bulding #1, office #426

juchische@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.12.14722

Received:

14-03-2015


Published:

25-01-2016


Abstract: In her article Chernovitskaya analyzes the growth of the political, social, economic and other genocide practices in the world, their acceptability and emergence of new violent practices which underlines the conceptual crisis of the term 'genocide', its controversial and contradictory nature. This emphasizes the need for creating an objective criterion for defining genocide. Chernovitskaya underlines how important it is to move from the principle of political premeditation in determining genocide to the principle of the system regularities, according to which the political, economic and social changes combined with the negligence of the ruling regime lead to massive destruction of the group, despite the fact that the destruction of the group is not directly intended. At the same time, at the present stage of developmet of human society the most dangerous feature is becoming the tendency towards transformation of direct genocide into indirect kind of genocide. This tendency is manifested in delibirate economic interventions aimed at changing the cultural and historical environment, in biological interventions aimed at changing the natural environment, and etc. Widespread modern technology does not only brings a person beyond his physical abilities, but also reduces the responsibility of management systems and distorts the concept of responsibility leading to gradual weakening of personal moral responsibility.


Keywords:

genocide, trend of transforming, intention, system regularities, indirect genocide, technologies, moral responsibility, directed change, violent practices, conceptual crisis

References
1. Konventsiya o preduprezhdenii prestupleniya genotsida i nakazaniya za nego ot 9 dekabrya 1948 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v dokumentakh / Sostavitel' N.T.Blatova, G.M.Melkov. M.: Profobrazovanie, 2003. 879 s.
2. Sm.: Kochoi S. Genotsid: ponyatie, otvetstvennost', praktika // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2001. № 2. S. 95-97.
3. Vartanyan V.M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za genotsid. Avtoref... diss... k.yu.n. Stavropol', 2000. 27 s.
4. Sm. Trainin A.N. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Zashchita mira i ugolovnyi zakon. M.: Nauka, 1969. 454 s.
5. Ternon Iv. Razmyshleniya o genotside. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa www.hrights.ru (data obrashcheniya 13.02.2014)
6. Shatalov A.T., Myandina G.I. Evgenika v kontekste sovremennykh dostizhenii genetiki cheloveka // Evgenika v diskurse global'nykh problem sovremennosti / Otv. red. Yu.V.Khen. M.: Kanon+, 2005. S. 218-239.
7. Mailenova F.G. Vozmozhnosti modifikatsii prirody cheloveka segodnya // Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IF RAN, 2008. S. 83-94.
8. Vartanyan V.M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za genotsid. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2000. 166 s.
9. Madievskii S. Pochemu Kholokost? // Novyi mir. № 9. 1998. S. 219-227.
10. Zubets O.P. Ot diskussii o lzhi k molchaniyu o Kholokoste // Postigaya dobro: sbornik statei. K 60-letiyu Rubena Grantovicha Apresyana. M.: Al'fa-M, 2013. S. 290-310.
11. Panarin A.S. Strategicheskaya nestabil'nost' v KhKhI veke. M.: Algoritm, 2003. 560 s.
12. Kochetov E.G. Globalistika kak geoekonomika, kak real'nost', kak mirozdanie… M.: OAO Izdatel'skaya gruppa «PROGRESS», 2001. 704 s.
13. Kochetov E.G. Globalistika: Teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA, 2002. 647 s.
14. Sychev A.A. Eticheskie izmereniya bioraznoobraziya // Postigaya dobro: sbornik statei. K 60-letiyu Rubena Grantovicha Apresyana. M.: Al'fa-M, 2013. S. 385-401.
15. Panarin A.S. Iskushenie globalizmom. M., 2002. 415 s.
16. Mill J.St. The philosophy of John Stuart Mill. N.Y., 1961. P. 198. Tsit. po: Tishchenko P.D. Ugroza mnozhestvennosti i ideya gumanitarnoi ekspertizy // Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IF RAN, 2008. S. 102-128.
17. Tishchenko P.D. Ugroza mnozhestvennosti i ideya gumanitarnoi ekspertizy // Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IF RAN, 2008. S. 102-128.
18. Genotsid (entsiklopediya katastrof) / Pod red. Revyako T.I. Mn.: Literatura, 1996. 423 s.
19. Panarin A.S. Filosofiya politiki. M.: Novaya shkola, 1996. 424 s.
20. Merkulov I.P. Vzaimosvyaz' biologicheskoi i kul'turnoi evolyutsii // Biologiya i kul'tura. / Otv.red. Liseev I.K. M.: Kanon+, 2004. S. 288-317.
21. Liseev I.K. Predislovie // Evgenika v diskurse global'nykh problem sovremennosti / Otv.red. Khen Yu.V. M.: Kanon+, 2005. S. 3-6.
22. Jonas H. Philosophical Reflection on Experiments with Human Subjects // Experimentation with Human Subjects / Ed. By P.A.Freund, George Braziller Inc., 1970. P. 529. Tsit. po: Yudin B.G. Eticheskoe izmerenie sovremennoi nauki // Etika nauki. M.: IF RAN, 2007. S. 98-116.
23. Khen Yu.V. Tseli i sredstva evgeniki (eticheskii i estestvennonauchnyi status distsipliny) // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 11: Etos nauki na rubezhe vekov. M.: IF RAN, 2005. S. 243-260.
24. Tishchenko P.D. Eticheskie problemy razvitiya biotekhnologii // Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 2. M.: IF RAN, 2008. S. 55-82.
25. Emanuel', Iezekiil' Dzh. Eticheskaya i pravovaya storona provedeniya klinicheskikh issledovanii (Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research): sbornik statei i kommentariev; per. s angl. pod. red. V. V. Vlasova. M.: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2013. 493 s.
26. Sm.: Bromlei Yu.V. Ocherki teorii etnosa. M.: Nauka, 1983. 418 s.
27. Kozlov V.I. Osnovnye problemy etnicheskoi ekologii // Sov.etnografiya. 1983. S. 3-16.
28. Markuze G. Eros i tsivilizatsiya. Odnomernyi chelovek: Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial'nogo obshchestva / G. Markuze; Per. s angl., poslesl., primech. A.A. Yudina; Sost., predisl. V.Yu. Kuznetsova. M: OOO "Izdatel'stvo ACT", 2002. 526 s.
29. Gerasimova I.A. Etos nauki. Problema dobra i zla // Etos nauki. M.: Academia, 2008. S. 317-337.
30. Skolimowski H. Freedom, Responsibility and the Information Society. Vital Speeches 50, no. 16 (June I, 1984), p. 495. Tsit. po: Mitchem K. Chto takoe filosofiya tekhniki? M.: Aspekt Press, 1995. 149 s.
31. Delyagin M. Mesto Rossii v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Nash sovremennik. № 7, 2001.
32. Nasilie: sotsio-politicheskii analiz / A.V.Dmitriev, I.Yu.Zalysin. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000. 328 s.
33. Arendt Kh. Otvetstvennost' i suzhdenie. M.: Izd. Instituta Gaidara, 2013. 352 s.
34. Brossat A. Tsit. po Kotek Zh., Rigulo P. Vek lagerei: lishenie svobody, kontsentratsiya, unichtozhenie. Sto let zlodeyanii. M.: Tekst, 2003. 687 s.
35. Bibler V.S. Perestroika i nravstvennost' (materialy Kruglogo stola) // Vopr. filosofii. 1990. № 7. S. 13-14.
36. Mitchem K. Chto takoe filosofiya tekhniki? M.: Aspekt Press, 1995. 149 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.