Статья 'Феноменологические принципы структурирования образов науки ' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Феноменологические принципы структурирования образов науки

Kulikov Sergey Borisovitch

Doctor of Philosophy

dean at Tomsk State Pedagogical University

634061, Russia, Tomsk Region, Tomsk, str. Kievskaya, 60

kulikovsb@tspu.edu.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.10.15441

Received:

31-05-2015


Published:

1-4.8-2015


Abstract: The subject of the research is the mechanisms of structuring images of science within implementation of the phenomenological program of researches first founded by Edmund Husserl in the first third of the XXth century. The relevance and importance of the topic is caused by the two facts. Firstly, the relevance is caused by the great value which phenomenological development in modern philosophy has. The phenomenological program of researches is realized in the field of art, policy and culture in general. Secondly, researches that are based on the phenomenological approach to structuring images of science possesses the heuristic potential to overcome manipulative strategy revealing in the process of demystification (more precisely, demythologization) pf procedures for creating scientific knowledge. The methodology of the research includes the comparative analysis and hermeneutic reconstruction which allow to compare phenomenology with other options of understanding of science images and to reveal complete sense of phenomenology. The novelty of the research is caused by the special turn of philosophical thought which was required to be executed in order to understand the object under research, i.e. the image of science. The author comes to the conclusion that within phenomenology reviving some ideals of antiquity in modern culture, images of science are structured within the general denaturalization of knowledge which, however, doesn't coincide with historical forms of knowledge. From the phenomenological point of view, scientific activity is a process of creation of knowledge which implies procedures of justification and description as part of the cognitive mind. Such understanding of science images allows to understand their ineradicable plurality in modern culture and to explain the reasons of this plurality. 


Keywords:

methodology of philosophical research, phenomenology, image of science, ancient legacy, demystification of discoveries, ideal, naturalism, historicism, horizon, world of science

References
1. Barthes R. Mythologies. Paris, 1957..
2. Sartr Zh.-P. Voobrazhaemoe. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya vospriyatiya. SPb., 2001.
3. Kopnin P.V. Gnoseologicheskie i logicheskie osnovy nauki. M., 1974.
4. Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: V 3kh tt. M., 1974-77. T. 1.
5. Shtreker E. Gusserlevskaya ideya fenomenologii kak obosnovyvayushchei teorii nauki // Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki. M., 1996.
6. Bast R.A. Der Wissenschaftsbegriff Martin Heideggers im Zusammenhang seiner Philosophie. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1986.
7. Bruzina R. Husserl’s “Naturalism” and Genetic Phenomenology // New Yearbook for Phenomenology & Phenomenology Philosophy. 2010. V. 10. No. 1. P. 91-125.
8. Kulikov S.B. Kritika E.Gusserlem osnovanii fiziko-matematicheskogo estestvoznaniya: relyativistskie sledstviya // Filosofiya nauki. 2005. № 4 (27). S. 3-13.
9. Kulikov S.B. Osnovy filosofskogo analiza nauki: metodologiya, smysl i tsel'. Tomsk, 2005.
10. Kulikov S.B. Protsessy transformatsii filosofskikh obrazov nauki. Tomsk, 2012.
11. Kulikov S.B. Fenomenologicheskii podkhod – klyuch k ponimaniyu prichin transformatsii filosofskikh obrazov nauki // Horizon. Fenomenologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013.T. 2 (2). S. 61-74.
12. Kulikov S.B. Osobennosti fenomenologicheskoi rekonstruktsii protsessov transformatsii v kul'ture filosofskikh obrazov nauki: naturalizm vs istoritsizm // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2014. № 7 (148). S. 25-32.
13. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Minsk, M., 2000.
14. Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaya. M., 2009.
15. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1994.
16. Merlo-Ponti M. Vidimoe i nevidimoe. Mn., 2006.
17. Gartman N. K osnovopolozheniyu ontologii. SPb., 2003.
18. Gartman N. Estetika. Kiev, 2004.
19. Fedotova V.G., Yakovleva A.F. Nauka kak fenomen moderna (Stat'ya vtoraya) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. 9. C. 1299-1306. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.9.9239.
20. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Nauka i obrazovanie v global'no-noosfernoi perspektive // Sotsiodinamika. 2013. 2. C. 161-222. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.2.439. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_439.html.
21. Baksanskii O.E. Mirovozzrenie budushchego: konvergentsiya kak fundamental'nyi printsip. // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2014. 3. C. 17-29. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.3.13521
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.