Abstract: This is the review of the encyclopedic dictionary 'Philosphers of Modern Russia' (content by M. Bakhtin published in St. Petersburg in 2015). The above mentioned encylopedic dicionary is not the first attempt to provide insight into philosophers and philosophy from the point of view of the development of the latter throughout the history. In this regard, we can't keep from mentioning Pyotr Alekseev's contribution to publishing editions of this kind. Those editions excelled in strict academic manner and well developed manner of materials selection and evaluation. The encyclopedic dictionary the author is talking now does not withstand competition with the previous editions. The dictionary lacks complete data about the most famous philosophers and the material selection has a random nature as the author says himself. Gurevich bases his research on strong experience in writing encyclopedia obtained during the Soviet times. He follows traditions of the best glossaries our academic literature is so rich with. The reviewer approves of the editor's attempt to provide comprehensive and extensive research which would allow to describe different sides of the historical and philosophical process. Unfortunately, such interesting idea has led to creation of the 'intermediate' kind of dictionary. It is more likely to be the groundwork for a future substantive edition that will provide a better picture of the life of the philosophical society in our country.
References
1. Filosofy sovremennoi Rossii. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Izd. 3-e, ispr. i dop. / Sost., vstup. st., pril. M.V. Bakhtina. M.: Izd. dom «Maksimum»; SPb.: Izdatel'skii mir'', 2015. 816 s.
2. Gurevich P.S. Retsenziya na: «Filosofy Rossii nachala XXI stoletiya: Biografii, idei. Trudy: entsiklopedicheskii slovar'» // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. ¹ 7. S. 171.
3. Gurevich P.S. Filosofskie prostory teorii poznaniya (tematicheskii obzor) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. ¹ 6(42). S. 170-179.
4. Knyazeva E.N. Enaktivizm: novaya forma konstruktivizma v epistemologii. M., SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; Universitetskaya kniga, 2014. 345 s.
5. Podoroga V.A. O chem sprashivayut, kogda sprashivayut «chto takoe filosofiya»? // Filosofskii zhurnal. 2009. ¹ 1(2). S. 5-17.
6. Shokhin V.K. Filosofskii klassitsizm i sovremennoe sluzhenie dukhu vremeni // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 11(83). S. 1555-1561. (DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.11.13105).
7. Bakhtin M.V. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Filosofy sovremennoi Rossii. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Izd. 3-e, ispr. i dop. / Sost., vstup. st., pril. M.V. Bakhtina. M.: Izd. dom «Maksimum»; SPb.: Izdatel'skii mir'', 2015. S. 3-6.
8. Alekseev P.V. Filosofy Rossii XIX–XX stoletii. Biografii. Idei. Trudy. Izd-e tret'e, pererab. i dop. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 1999. 944 s.
9. Antichnaya filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Predsed. red. koll. P.P. Gaidenko; Otv. red. M.A. Solopova. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 896 s.
10. Kto segodnya delaet filosofiyu v Rossii. Tom III / Avt.-sost. A.S. Nilogov. M.: OOO «Sam Poligrafist», 2015. 736 s.
11. Kul'turologiya. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t. / Gl. red. i avtor proekta S.Ya. Levit. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007. T. 1 – 1302 s., T. 2 – 1184 s.
12. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / Predsed. nauchno-redakts. soveta akad. RAN V.S. Stepin. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 1 – 744 s., T. 2 – 634 s., T. 3 – 692 s., T. 4 – 736 s
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.