Ñòàòüÿ 'Ýðíñò Ìàõ è ôèëîñîôèÿ íàóêè' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Ýðíñò Ìàõ è ôèëîñîôèÿ íàóêè

Danielyan Naira Vladimirovna

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, National Research University of Electronic Technology

124498, Russia, Moscow Oblast, Zelenograd, Ploshad Shokina 1

vend22@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17724

Received:

25-01-2016


Published:

20-05-2016


Abstract: This article is devoted to the Austrian scientist Ernst Mach’s philosophical heritage. The reason for its writing is 100th anniversary of his death and the relevance of his works for the contemporary science. They had a great influence on understanding the nature of the cognition and forming non-classical space and time ideas. The main accent is made on the epistemological breakthrough based on his ideas: transference of cognition subject from transcendental to natural world; empirical knowledge as a sum of natural and mental processes («sets of feelings»); forming empiriocriticism as a direction that stimulated neopositivism appearance; relative nature of space and time that resulted in both Einstein’s theory of relativity and the relational concept of space and time developed in science nowadays. The author proves that Mach’s suggestion to consider the basic purpose of science as adapting an idea to experience gives a negative result due to the unilateral direction of the cognition process and the emergence of «model-dependent realism». As for the methodology of his works, they were written from the position of dialectics because of Mach’s argument with Newton and Kant’s metaphysical approach to a priori and absolute categories. The author makes a conclusion from the research that it was Mach who proposed the idea of the unity of subject and object in the form of their «principal coordination». This approach forms the foundation of understanding the cognition process in modern epistemology.


Keywords:

Subject, Object, Cognition, Experience, “complex of sensations”, Space, Time, “economy of thinking”, Relativity, Non-classics

References
1. Einshtein A. Ernst Makh.// Sobranie nauchnykh trudov v chetyrekh tomakh. T.IV. Stat'i, retsenzii, pis'ma. Evolyutsiya fiziki. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1967. 600s.
2. Makh E. Analiz oshchushchenii i otnoshenie fizicheskogo k psikhicheskomu. Per. s nem. M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005. 304s.
3. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. Simferopol': «Renome», 2003. 464s.
4. Lektorskii V.A. Kant, radikal'nyi konstruktivizm i konstruktivnyi realizm v epistemologii.// Voprosy filosofii. ¹8, 2005. S.11-21.
5. Makh E. Populyarno-nauchnye ocherki. Per. s nem. Izdanie stereotipnoe. M.: KomKniga, 2015. 344s.
6. Makh E. Poznanie i zabluzhdenie: Prostranstvo i geometriya s tochki zreniya estestvoznaniya.// Filosofiya nauki: Epistemologiya. Poznanie. Kul'tura: Khrestomatiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov./ Otv. red.-sost. L.A. Mikeshina. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta v Moskve, 2006. S.547-553.
7. Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode. Kn. pervaya. O poznanii. M.: Kanon+ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. 399s.
8. Mach E. Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1922. 323S.
9. Danielyan N.V. Vzglyad na nauchnuyu kartinu mira v filosofii Devida Yuma i sovremennoi epistemologii.// Filosofiya i kul'tura. ¹2(38), 2011. S.20-29.
10. Zherebin A.I. Ernst Makh i problema razrusheniya lichnosti.// Voprosy filosofii. ¹1, 2013. S.135-145.
11. Makh E. Mekhanika. Per. s nem. Izdanie stereotipnoe. M.: KomKniga, 2015. 456s.
12. Gaidenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeiskoi filosofii i nauke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007. 464s.
13. Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie. M.: Nauka, 2007. 621s.
14. Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 624s
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.