Интерпретация ценностного отношения в античности и в Новое время

Клецкин Михаил Васильевич

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2016.12.18120


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Kletskin M.V. The interpretation of value relation in ancient history and modern era // Philosophy and Culture. 2016. № 12. P. 1654-1663. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.12.18120 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18120

Интерпретация ценностного отношения в античности и в Новое время

Kletskin Mikhail Vasil'evich

PhD in Philosophy

N/A

443080, Russia, Samara, Sanfirovoy Street 99

samkoms@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Axiology: values and relics"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.12.18120

Received:

24-02-2016

Published:

22-01-2017

Abstract: The subject of this research is the understanding of the category of “good” in philosophy of Plato, Aristotle, and Stoic Zeno. The author examines the establishment of praxeological perception of the value relation in philosophy of the modern era. Realization of the new task of the research suggest resolution of the question regarding nature and essence of the value relation, as well as place of the unconscious reasoning in formation of the existential being. It is necessary to illustrate the causes for establishment of the peculiar ancient perception of good as the highest “idea” of being overall, as well as formation of the content of the notion of “value” in the New European philosophy. The main conclusion consists in the following position: in ancient worldview, a man did not create the world around himself, but rather God, nature, and logos through the man, who instead of consolidation of his authority over nature, was forced to subordinate to the compulsion of necessity. The author also presents the idea that value is the attribute of any subject of existential being, because the soul embodies its immanent demands within them, as well as creates them as the tool for realization of telos.

Keywords:

Being, Telos, Axiology, Unconscious, Value relation, Good, Aristotle, Plato , Stoicism, Value

References

1. A Greek-English Lexicon Compiled by H.G. Liddelland R. Scott. A New Edition Revised and Augmented Throughout by Sir H.S.Jones. Vol. l .Oxf., 1940.
2. Fries J.F. Handbuch der praktischen Philosophic oder der philosophischen Zwecklehre. Th. 1., Bd. 1. Heidelberg, 1818.
3. Fries J.F. Neue oder anthropologisehe Kritik der Vernunft. Bd. 1-3. Heidelberg, 1828-1831.
4. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh tomakh.-M.: Mysl', 1975.-T.1.-550 s.
5. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh tomakh.-M.: Mysl', 1983.-T.4.-830 s.
6. Gegel' G. V. F. Fenomenologiya dukha.-M.: Nauka, 2000.-495 s.
7. Gegel' G.F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kniga tret'ya.-SPb.: Nauka,-583 s.
8. Gobbs T. Sochineniya v 2-kh tomakh. T.2.-M.: Mysl', 1991. – 627 s.
9. Derrida Zh. Golos i fenomen.-SPb.: Aleteiya, 1999.-208 s.
10. Kant I. Sochineniya. V 8-mi t. T. 4.-M: Choro, 1994.-630 s.
11. Kant I. Sochineniya. V 8-mi tomakh. T.5.-M.: Choro, 1994. – 414 s.
12. Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya: v 3 tomakh. T. 3.-M.: Mysl', 1988.-668 s.
13. Monten' M. Opyty. Kniga pervaya.-M.-L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1954. – 559 s.
14. Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1.-SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2006.-632 s.
15. Platon. Gosudarstvo // Sochineniya v trekh tomakh.-M.: Mysl', 1971.-T.Z.-687 s.
16. Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3. Ch. 1.-SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2007.-752 s.
17. Spinoza B. Sochineniya v 2-kh tomakh. T. I.-SPb.: Nauka, 1999.-489 s.
18. Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov (chast' 1): Ot empiricheskikh teokosmologii do vozniknoveniya atomistiki.-M.: Nauka, 1989.-576 s.
19. Fragmenty rannikh stoikov. T.1.-M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet, 1998. – 252 s.
20. Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya.-Khar'kov: Folio, 2003.-503 s.
21. Khaidegger M. Vremya i Bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya.-M.: Respublika,1993.-447 s.
22. Tsitseron. O predelakh blaga i zla. Paradoksy stoikov.-M.: RGGU, 2000. – 480 s.
23. Shokhin V.K. Filosofiya tsennostei i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl': Monografiya.-M.: RUDN, 2006.-457 s.
24. Shpil'rein S.N. Destruktsiya kak prichina stanovleniya // Logos.-№ 5, 1994. s. 207-238.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.