|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Mikhailov I.A.
Phenomenologists debating ontology and anthropology: a “failed conversation” (Husserl and Heidegger in 1920-30-s)
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 4.
P. 593-602.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.18527 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18527
Полемика феноменологов по проблемам онтологии и антропологии: «неспособность к разговору» (Гуссерль и Хайдеггер, 1928-1930-е гг.)
Mikhailov Igor' Anatol'evich
Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str.1
|
mihayyl.igor@rambler.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.18527
Received:
29-03-2016
Published:
14-06-2016
Abstract:
The article deals with transformations that took place in the German phenomenology in the first decades of the XX Century and were stimulated by a discontinuity of the phenomenological idea of strict science and the growing popularity of anthropology and biology. The author focuses on the differences in Husserl’s and Heidegger’s phenomenological approaches and on the internal situation in the phenomenological community, which required thematic specialization of phenomenological research, commitment to a single theoretical paradigm and institutional reinforcement after Husserl’s retirement from Freiburg. The paper uses methods of historical and conceptual analysis along with an approach from the side of sociology of knowledge. It is shown that Husserl views anthropology in the light of his earlier relativism and psychologism critique. However, Husserl fails to distinguish between “anthropology”, “philosophy of life” and “existential philosophy” and does not find any new philosophical arguments against these new forms of philosophizing. The article also shows that Husserl and Heidegger are basing themselves on different understanding of what is "initial grounds” for the philosophical research: ontology, strict science, or the doctrine about humans.
Keywords:
Husserl, Heidegger, science, phenomenology, relativism, philosophy of life, anthropology, sociology of knowledge, ontology, human studies
References
1. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Ch. 1. Prolegomeny k chistoi logike / Pod red. i s predisl. S.L. Franka. SPb., 1909. XVI, 224 s.
2. Mikhailov I.A. Psikhologizm, relyativizm i antropologiya v fenomenologicheskoi filosofii (1900-1920-e gg.) // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik'2011. M., 2012. S. 289-312.
3. Blumenberg H. Beschreibung des Menschen. Frankfurt a.M., 2006, 918 S.
4. Heidegger M. Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Freiburger Vorlesung Wintersemester 1930-31 // Martin Heidegger Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt a.M., 1980. Bd. 32. VIII, 224 S.
5. Husserl E. Briefe an Roman Ingarden (Phaenomenologica 25). Den Haag, 1968. X, 188 S.
6. Husserl E. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Haale (Saale), 1929. XIII, 299 S.
7. Husserl E. Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Briefwechsel. Teil 2. Die Münchener Phänomenologen. Dordrecht, 1994. XI, 293 S.
8. Husserl E. Husserliana. Dokumente. Bd. III. Briefwechsel. Teil 6. Philosophenbriefe. Dordrecht, 1994. XIII, 516 S.
9. Husserl E. Phänomenologie und Anthropologie // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1941. vol. 2. No. 1. (Sep.) P. 1-14.
10. Ryle G. Review of Heidegger's Sein ind Zeit // Mind. 1929. Vol. 38. P. 355-370.
11. Schuhmann K. Husserl-Chronik. Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. Den Haag, 1977. XXI, 516 S.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|