|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Iakovlev V.A.
To the new outlook of the question on dialectics
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 7.
P. 935-944.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.7.19475 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19475
К новой постановке вопроса о диалектике
Iakovlev Vladimir Anatolievich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Natural Science at Lomonosov Moscow State University
117463, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Inessy Armand, 4, korp. 2, kv. 7
|
goroda460@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.7.19475
Received:
14-06-2016
Published:
07-09-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the understanding of dialectics as a universality of the critical interpretational rationalism. The main stages of the establishment of a new dialectical method in the history of philosophy are being examined. Special attention is given to the Hegelian and the Marxist theories of dialectics. The author determines the essential cluster of the elements (core) of dialectics, which remains throughout the entire history of its development. The scientific novelty consists in the following statement: the linear dialectics of the XIX century is currently opposed to the nonlinear dialectics, the essence of which lies in the hermeneutic movement for the purpose of resolution of the contradictions between the part and the whole, private and public, secondary and primary. The object is being viewed alternately in different contexts, and the mind sort of executes a “shuttle” movement from the object to one “horizon”, from the latter to another “horizon”, and then back to the object. Unlike the linear scheme (thesis – antithesis – synthesis), the new understanding of dialectics first and foremost consists in the ability to fit an object into various, and most often opposite (contrary), conceptual contexts, which confront each other as binary oppositions.
Keywords:
dialectics, binarity, oppositions, semantic contexts, hermeneutic, rationalism, contradiction, method, laws, culture
References
1. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch., t. 23. S. 22.
2. Lenin V.I. K voprosu o dialektike. Poln. sobr. soch., t. 29. S. 316 – 322.
3. Lenin V.I. Materializm i empiriokrititsizm. Poln. sobr. soch., t. 18. S. 131.
4. Oizerman T.I. Dialekticheskii materializm / Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4 t. / In-t filosofii Rossiiskoi akad. nauk; Gl. red. V. S. Stepin. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 1. S. 657.
5. Yakovlev V. A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 10.-S.1-57
6. Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnaya programma novoi epistemologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 10.-S.1460-1470.
7. Sm: st. Dialektika / Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 1983. S. 158.
8. Suvorov L.N., Voprosy dialektiki v «Filosofskikh tetradyakh» V.I. Lenina. M., 1960. S. 35-78.
9. Kedrov B.M. O «Dialektike prirody» Engel'sa. M., 1973. S. 81-112.
10. Makarov A.D. O proizvedenii Fridrikha Engel'sa «Anti-Dyuring M., 1951. S. 7-49.
11. Kedrov B.M. K izucheniyu knigi V.I.Lenina «Materializm i empiriokrititsizm». M., 1973. S. 85-167.
12. Materializm i empiriokrititsizm v Rossii i za rubezhom. Novye materialy. M., 1990. S. 7-68.
13. Il'enkov E. V., Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v «Kapitale» Marksa. M. 1960. S. 34-89.
14. Vazyulin V. A. Logika «Kapitala» K. Marksa M. 1968. S. 33-78.
15. Il'enkov E.V. Dialektika i germenevtika // Sovremennye zarubezhnye kontseptsii dialektiki. Kriticheskie ocherki. M.: 1987. S. 133-163.
16. Popper K. Chto takoe dialektika? // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. № 1. S. 118-138.
17. Sm.: Edinstvo nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1988. S. 280-285.
18. Gegel' G.V.F. Soch. M., 1929. T. l. C. 133.
19. Gegel' G.V.F. Raboty razlichnykh let: V 2 t. T.2, M., 1970. S. 541.
20. Popper K. Darvinizm kak metafizicheskaya issledovatel'skaya programma. // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. № 12. S. 39—49.
21. Chaikovskii Yu.V. Nevostrebovannyi sintez. Ob evolyutsionnykh vzglyadakh K. Poppera // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. № 12. S. 50—54.
22. PetukhovS.V. Geneticheskii kod i proektsionnye operatory matrichnogo genotipa / Metafizika, 2014, № 1 (11). C. 54.
23. Grekhem L.R. Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauki o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze. Per. s angl. — M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 9-56.
24. Interv'yu s akademikom V.L. Ginzburgom / METAFIZIKA. VEK XXI. AL''MANAKh. VYP. 3. Nauka, filosofiya, religiya. 2010. S. 26
25. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality and the sociology of knowledge / Ed. by Radnitsky 0., Bartley W.W. III.-La Salle (III.)j Open court, 1988.-XIV, 475 p.
26. Sovremennye teorii poznaniya. M.,INION RAN, 1992. S. 9-87.
27. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: problemy, perspektivy. M., 1996. S. 7-15.
28. Merkulov I.P. Kognitivnaya evolyutsiya. M., 1998. S.10-45.
29. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov SP. Intuitsiya kak samodostraivanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 2. S. 112.
30. Sartr Zh.P. Problema metoda. M. 1994. S. 22-43.
31. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsii. M., 1995. S. 54-77.
32. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. M., 1988. S. 351.
33. Menskii M.B. Intuitsiya i kvantovyi podkhod k teorii soznaniya. / Voprosy filosofii. 2015. № 4. S. 64-74.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
