Статья 'Этнический миф как средство сохранения этнокультурной идентичности (на примере культуры адыгов)' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Этнический миф как средство сохранения этнокультурной идентичности (на примере культуры адыгов)

Siiukhova Aminet

Doctor of Cultural Studies

Professor, the department of Philosophy, Social Studies and Pedagogy, Maykop State Technological University

385000, Russia, respublika Adygeya, g. Maikop, ul. Pervomaiskaya, 191

aminsi@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.8.19656

Received:

05-07-2016


Published:

16-10-2016


Abstract: This article examines the process of transformation of ethnic myth in the Circassian culture, starting with the antiquity era of creation of the epos of “Narta” and spanning to the modern post-Soviet period. In the first part of this work the author conceptualizes the notion of “ethnic myth”, as well as asserts the characteristics of its multilayerdness and universality as form of collective consciousness. In the context of the conducted research, the notion of “ethnic myth” becomes an instrument which allows the more detailed examination of separate segments of the ethnic pattern of the Circassians, as well as its wholeness. In other words, ethnic myth is illustrated as one of the forms of consciousness, including the modern representative of an ethnic group. To analyze the transformation processes of ethnic consciousness, the author applies methodology of G. Durand, who claims that the  world for a  man is can only be in “imaginary” form – a myth, collective and unconscious, which emerges as a primary process and consists form the imaginary, imaginer, and imagination along with the imagination process itself. The correlation of the two specific imaginary modes – day and night, expresses the peculiarities of different culture. Based on this fact the author analyzes the historical change of the boundary between the day and night segments of ethnic myth of the Circassians, which comprises the scientific novelty of this work. Based on the example of evolution of the mythical-epical understanding of ethnic values, the author makes the conclusion of the priority of the day world perception of the ancient Circassians, while the artistic heritage of antiquity already demonstrated the beans of the night mythological consciousness. The author also follows the changes in traditions and rituals, as well as brings examples of the modern forms of ethnic interactions which reflect the specificity of the day and night levels of mythological consciousness among the representatives of the ethnos.


Keywords:

Circassians, ethnic myth, picture of the world, imaginary, Diurne/Nocturne mode, epic, night images, ritual practices, post-Soviet sociocultural space, ethnic identity

References
1. Maidanov A.S. Sootnesenie mifologicheskikh i nauchnykh obrazov real'nosti kak metod ikh vzaimnoi interpretatsii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. № 5. S.55-86. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.5.18971. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_18971.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).
2. Mifologicheskii slovar' / pod. red. E. M. Meletinskogo. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1991. 634 s.
3. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. – M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. – 303 s. URL :http://modernlib.ru/books/losev_aleksey/dialektika_mifa/read/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).
4. Bromlei Yu.V. Ocherki teorii etnosa. Izd. 2-e, dop. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 436 s.
5. Osokin Yu.V. Sovremennaya kul'turologiya v entsiklopedicheskikh stat'yakh. M.: KomKniga, 2007. – 384 s
6. Durand G. Les structures anthropologiques de l'Imaginaire. Bordas, Paris, 1983 (1ère édition : Bordas, Paris, 1969). 501 p.
7. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-PPP, 1996. 240 s.
8. Dugin A.G. Logos i mifos: Sotsiologiya glubin. Kurs lektsii. Rostov-na-Donu, 2009. URL: http://www.imaginaire.ru.k0.gfns.net/content/dugin-logos-i-mifos-sociologiya-glubin (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2012).
9. Deti solntsa / [sost. A. P. Khabakhu]. Maikop: Adygeya, 2005. 45 s.
10. Khanakhu R.A., Tsvetkov O.M. Nekotorye tipologicheskie kharakteristiki traditsionnoi kul'tury adygov (k probleme mental'nosti) // Filosofiya i sotsiologiya. Vyp. 4. Maikop: ARIGI, 1996. S. 44-60.
11. Narty. Kabardinskii epos. M., 1957. 526 s.
12. Dmitriev V.A. Prostranstvenno-vremennoe povedenie v traditsionnoi kul'ture narodov Severnogo Kavkaza. Avtoref. …doktora istoricheskikh nauk. SPb., 2010. 42 s.
13. Siyukhova A.M. Metafizika sakral'nogo i obydennogo v traditsionnom prostranstve adygskoi kunatskoi (khacheshch) // Vestnik Maikopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2009. № 2. S. 18-21.
14. Siyukhova A.M. Drevnii adygskii obryad u posteli bol'nogo «chapshch» kak sotsiokul'turnyi institut // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 1. S. 77-81.
15. Mafedzev S. Kh. Adygi. Obychai, traditsii (Adyge khabze). Nal'chik: El'-fa, 2000. 359 s.
16. Siyukhova A.M. Nochnye snovideniya kak istochnik etnicheskoi sistemy simvolov (na primere kul'tury adygov) // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2012. № 6. S. 72-81.
17. Siyukhova A.M. Sovremennaya adygskaya pesnya v postsovetskom sotsiokul'turnom prostranstve // Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii. 2015. № 3 (58). S. 36-41.
18. Siyukhova A.M. Gorodskie mify i simvolicheskie prostranstva periferiinogo polikul'turnogo goroda (na primere Maikopa) // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 51-58.
19. Sokolova A.N. Obrazovatel'naya sistema v izuchenii traditsionnykh kul'tur polietnicheskogo goroda (na materiale sots. issledovaniya) / A.N. Sokolova, H.A. Neflyasheva, A.M. Siyukhova // Obrazovanie goroda na puti k XXI veku. Maikop, 2000. S. 183-189.
20. Khil'ko N.F. Lokalizatsiya mekhanizmov natsional'no-kul'turnoi identifikatsii v narodnykh tradtsiyakh rossiyan // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. 3. C. 300 306. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.3.12024.
21. Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostei // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. 5. C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
22. Khokon S.E., Siyukhova A.M. Adygskii etnokostyum v sotsiokul'turnoi situatsii sovremennogo polietnichnogo regiona // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2014. 5. C. 1-31. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14593. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14593.html
23. Seredkina N.N. Teoreticheskaya model' pozitivnoi etnicheskoi identichnosti i mekhanizmy ee formirovaniya // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. 2. C. 37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.2.17690. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17690.html
24. Napso M.D. Riski globalizatsii dlya natsional'noi traditsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. 2. C. 129 134. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17374.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.