Статья '«Конкретность» как предмет умолчания: к вопросу об отношении А. Ф. Лосева к трансцендентально-спекулятивной философии Гегеля' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

«Конкретность» как предмет умолчания: к вопросу об отношении А. Ф. Лосева к трансцендентально-спекулятивной философии Гегеля

Korotkikh Vyacheslav Ivanovich

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences at Yelets State University N. A. Ivan Bunin

399770, Russia, Lipetskaya oblast', g. Elets, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 58, kv. 4

shortv@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.19977

Received:

04-08-2016


Published:

14-11-2016


Abstract: This article explores the relation of A. F. Losev to the transcendental understanding of being in the philosophy of Hegel. Basing on the observation of V. O. Troitsky, according to which the Russian philosopher avoids using the notion of “haecceity”, the author reveals the position of A. F. Loves regarding Hegel’s philosophy, as well as underlines the specificities of Russian philosophy in the global historical-philosophical process. Special attention is given to the analysis of Hegel’s concept of the structure of reasoning, as well as Losev’s doctrine on correlation of the symbol and artistic image. The author proves that the noted by the Russian researcher peculiarity of Losev’s use of the philosophical terminology is caused by the nonrandom factors, but rather its fundamental position on the key issue of ontology. For the first time in scientific literature, the author reveals the peculiarities of the aesthetical doctrines of the German and Russian philosophers that are substantiated by their ontological preferences. This work also reconstructs the historical-cultural context of the differences, detected between the philosophers, in the assessments of opportunity regarding the philosophical cognition of the Absolute.


Keywords:

Haecceity, A. F. Losev, Hegel, transcendentalism, structure of reasoning, certainty, symbolism, symbol, artistic image, specificities of the Russian philosophy

References
1. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 404 s.
2. Troitskii V. P. Razyskaniya o zhizni i tvorchestve A. F. Loseva. M.: Agraf, 2007. 448 s.
3. Losev A. F. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M.: Progress, 1990. 720 s.
4. Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. Filosofiya dukha. M.: Mysl', 1977. 471 s.
5. Gegel' G. V. F. Sistema nauki. Ch. 1. Fenomenologiya dukha // Sochineniya. T. IV. M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury, 1959. 440 s.
6. Gogotishvili L. A. Losevskaya kontseptsiya predikativnosti // Losev A. F. Lichnost' i absolyut. M.: Mysl', 1999. S. 770-795.
7. Losev A. F. Filosofiya imeni. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1990. 269 s.
8. Losev A. F. Nekotorye voprosy iz istorii uchenii o stile // Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. – Kiev: «Collegium», «Kievskaya Akademiya Evrobiznesa», 1994. S. 2-168.
9. Gegel' G. V. F. Sochineniya. T. XII. Lektsii po estetike. Kn. 1. M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1938. 471 s.
10. Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 s.
11. Hegel G. W. F. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun, 1987. 596 S.
12. R.K. Omel'chuk Aleksei Fedorovich Losev:
zhizn' v mife // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 5. - C. 424 - 432. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.5.8302.

13. E.M. Spirova Mif i simvol v protsesse
postizheniya cheloveka // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 10. - C. 34 - 41.

14. R.K. Omel'chuk Ontologiya very v svete
filosofskogo naslediya A.F. Loseva // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 11. - C. 15 - 25.

15. Gogotishvili L.A. Vklad postsimvolistov Loseva i Bakhtina v teoriyu postroeniya diskursa (printsipial'nye razlichiya na fone fundamental'nogo skhodstva) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 354 - 368. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.4.13430.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.