|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Gurevich P.S.
Can N. M. Karamzin be considered a philosopher?
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 11.
P. 1483-1486.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.11.21192 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=21192
Можно ли считать Н.М. Карамзина философом?
Gurevich Pavel Semenovich
head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -
|
gurevich@rambler.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.11.21192
Received:
23-11-2016
Published:
13-12-2016
Abstract:
Thus article is dedicated to N. M. Karamzin as a philosopher. Indeed, first and foremost, he was a historian, as well as writer. However, he did not hesitate to refer to him as a philosopher. And in the author’s opinion, he has all the reasons to call himself a philosopher. N. M. Karamzin introduced the word “identity” into the Russian speech. It does not quite seem like a big achievement. In the XVIII – early XIX centuries many humanitarians were fascinated with creation of words. But the word “identity” invented by Karamzin, met the in-depth demands of the Russian, as well as European philosophy. The categorical discourse already contained the words “individual” and “individuality”. And now, it was the time to signify a person as a specific, highest measure, carrier of the high spiritual and social qualities. For the first time in history, Karamzin is characterizes as a philosopher. He did not just introduced a new word into philosophy, but the definition of “identity” reflected a drastic turn not only in Russian, but also European philosophy. After Karamzin, the Russian philosophy has referred to the topic of personality, which led to establishment of the personalist philosophy in Russia.
Keywords:
Freedom, Integrity, Spirituality, Socialization, History, Identity, Individuality, Individual, Human, Personality
References
1. Bykova M.F. Nikolai Karamzin i evropeiskii gumanizm // Nikolai Karamzin i istoricheskie sud'by Rossii. K 250-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya / Obshch. red. i sost. A.A. Kara-Murzy, V.L. Sharovoi, A.F. Yakovlevoi. M.: Akvilon, 2016. S. 88-115.
2. Gal'tseva Renata, Rodnyanskaya Irina. K portretam russkikh myslitelei. M.: Petroglif, 2012. 758 s.
3. Gershenzon Mikhail. Izbrannoe. Mudrost' Pushkina. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2015. 656 s.
4. Girenok Fedor. Udovol'stvie myslit' inache. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2008. 235 s.
5. Kant I. Metafizika nravov // Kant I. Sobr. soch.: v 8 t. T. 6. M.: Charo, 1994. S. 224-541.
6. Kant I. Osnovopolozheniya metafiziki nravov // Kant I. Sobr. soch.: v 8 t. T. 4. M.: Charo, 1994. S. 153-246.
7. Kara-Murza A.A. Shveitsarskie stranstviya Nikolaya Karamzina (1789-1790). M.: Akvilon, 2016. 110 s.
8. Kutyrev V.A. Unesennye progressom. Eskhatologiya zhizni v tekhnogennom mire. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2016. 300 s.
9. M.M. Bakhtin kak filosof / Otv. red. L.A. Gogotishvili, P.S. Gurevich. M.: Nauka, 1992. 255 s.
10. Nikolai Karamzin i istoricheskie sud'by Rossii. K 250-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya / Obshch. red. i sost. A.A. Kara-Murzy, V.L. Sharovoi, A.F. Yakovlevoi. M.: Akvilon, 2016. 384 s.
11. Sukhov A.D. Russkie filosofstvuyushchie istoriki. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2016. 159 s
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|