Величи(на)е и коварство феноменологической идеи Гуссерля

Кутырев Владимир Александрович

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2011.5.3635


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Kutyrev V.A. // Philosophy and Culture. 2011. № 5. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2011.5.3635 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=3635

Величи(на)е и коварство феноменологической идеи Гуссерля

Kutyrev Vladimir Aleksandrovich

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of History, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod.

603137, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Golovanova, 59

kut.va@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Ontology: being and nihility"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2011.5.3635

Received:

17-04-2011

Published:

1-5-2011

References

Vse my dvizhemsya «k tochke». Ot tychki. (Tychinki i pestiki, muzhskoe i zhenskoe – tych i pesta. Eto staroe slavyanskoe nazvanie organov prodolzheniya zhizni. Otsyuda negativno-dvusmyslennoe otnoshenie k «tykaniyu». S odnoy storony: «ty» kak vyrazhenie blizosti, neformal'nosti otnosheniy, a s drugoy, «ty menya ne tykay»: «Ey, ty, nedotykanyy», sm.,naprimer, rasskaz G. Uspenskogo «Nedotykomka»).

Tychka v vide palki, o-palenoy vetki oboznachala granicu zemel'nogo uchastka i lyubogo prostranstva. Ego konec, nichto. Kak u grekov kamni =termy dlya teh zhe celey. V kul'ture, na pis'me tychka prevratilas' v tochku, oboznachayuschuyu granicy, konec predlozheniya. A s grecheskogo – v termin, odnoznachnoe ponyatie. Tochnoe znanie = chisto znakovoe = chisto terminologicheskoe = polnost'yu formalizovannoe = kognitivnoe = konechnoe = nebytiynoe znanie.

Zdes' nas podsteregaet strashnaya opasnost'. Modernizacii i antiistorizma, zhertvoy kotoryh obychno yavlyayutsya entuziasty «vsego novogo, progressivnogo». I togda pervobytnye ohotniki gonyalis' v lesu ne za myasom, a za informaciey, v virtual'nuyu real'nost' pervymi vyshli drevnie kitaycy ili Vasiliy Velikiy v Vizantii, Bog zhe, estestestvenno, byl Verhovnym Programmistom. Proyti mezhdu Scilloy uzko akademicheskogo, otraslevogo internalizma i Haribdoy poshlogo, poverhnostnogo prezentizma – vot uslovie produktivnogo filosofstvovaniya.

Gusserl' E. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka. // Izbrannye raboty. M., 2005. S. 214.

V rassmotrenii idey pozdnego Gusserlya my opiraemsya ne stol'ko na ego original'nye teksty, skol'ko na ih issledovanie v gusserlevedenii. Potomu chto nam vazhny ne teoreticheskie tonkosti, a principial'nye idei. Dlya chego, v konce koncov, suschestvuyut znatoki Gusserlya, zachem oni rabotayut? Nado pol'zovat'sya ih trudami. Krome svoego roda klassikov gusserlevedeniya, N.V. Motroshilovoy, V.I. Molchanova, Slinina A.Ya., Chernyakova A.G., po dannomu voprosu eto, prezhde vsego: Shtreker E. Gusserlevskaya ideya fenomenologii kak obosnovyvayuschey teorii nauki. //Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki. M., 1994; Borisov E.V. Problema intersub'ektivnosti v fenomenologii Gusserlya. // Logos. 1999. №1; Savin E.A. Genezis transcendental'noy monadologii v rabotah «pozdnego» Gusserlya. // Voprosy filosofii. 2009. №8; Smirnova N. M. Social'naya fenomenologiya v izuchenii sovremennogo obschestva. M., 2009.

Sm.: Husserl E. Husserliana. 1950. Bd.3. S.104. V poslednee vremya gusserlevedenie razvivaetsya v napravlenii sblizheniya s analiticheskoy filosofiey, no ves'ma robko, u nas poka epigonski, da i voobsche eto tol'ko vnutrifilosfskiy trend. Ego mozhno schitat' proyavleniem priblizheniya k traktovke transcendental'noy fenomenologii kak predtechi strukturalizma i informacionizma.

Sm., naprimer, stat'i v razdele: «Intersub'ektivnaya vozmozhnost' ontologii nauki» // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 14. Ontologiya nauki. M., 2009. Ili: V stat'e A.N Pavlenko «Yavlyaetsya li «kommunikativnaya programma» obosnovaniya znaniya universal'noy?» (Voprosy filosofii, 2009. № 11) social'no-tehnicheskaya priroda intersub'ektivnoy paradigmy govorit o sebe pryamo terminologicheski, v zagolovke, odnako ee vliyanie ob'yasnyaetsya pozitivistski, kritikuetsya ona za «neustranimyy logiko-epistemologicheskiy iz'yan». Problemy sociologii nauki, social'nye teorii poznaniya razrabatyvayutsya, no vidimo, v «drugom otdele», za stenkoy. Ee zhe ne preydeshi.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.