MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Davydov, V. A.
The Process of the History
Reconstruction (Peculiarities of Infl uence
of Culture and Society).
// Philosophy and Culture.
2011. № 3.
P. 14-24.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58041
Davydov, V. A. The Process of the History
Reconstruction (Peculiarities of Infl uence
of Culture and Society).
Abstract:
The article considers some aspects of the
process of infl uence of ideology, social cultural values,
standards of ethics and esthetics and etc. on
the process of history reconstruction. It is noted
that ideology infl uence is one of the most strongly
marked and the most distorting the entire process
and outcomes of the history reconstruction. The
author insists on the thesis that the implicit form of
basic cultural values and social norms is refl ected
in reconstructive ‘historical knowledge’. Moreover,
when the former changes, it makes the historical
knowledge to change, too. As a result, any society
would inevitably have its own history based on the
values and norms generally accepted in this society.
The author of the article also raises a question about moral and ethical responsibility of a historian
for results of such reconstruction.
Keywords:
philosophy, history reconstruction, historical knowledge, culture, axiological approach, objectivity, values, morals, ethics, esthetics
References
1. Antipov G. A. Prisushche li nauke nravstvennoe nachalo? // Nauka i tsennosti. Novosibirsk, 1987.
2. – S. 50.
3. Buller A. O predmete i metode teorii istoricheskogo poznaniya // Logos, 2001. №5-6. URL: http://
4. www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2008).
5. Buller A. Ukaz. soch. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashche-
6. niya: 23.10.2008).
7. Gobozov I. A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. M., 1999.
8. Gurevich A. Ya. Dvoyakaya otvetstvennost' istorika // Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya.
9. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 19-21 maya 1996 g. M., 1999. – S. 11-12.
10. Doroshenko N. M. Edinstvo nauchnogo i vnenauchnogo v istoricheskom poznanii // Nauchnye i vne-
11. nauchnye formy v sotsial'nom poznanii. M., 1985. – S. 165-166.
12. Krauze G. Razvitie ponimaniya istorii do Karla Marksa. SPb, 1906.
13. Loseva O. A. Aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya. Saratov, 2000.
14. Loseva O. A. Metodologicheskie i aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya.
15. Saratov, 2004.
16. Mikeshina L. A. Epistemologiya tsennostey. M., 2007.
17. Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya. V 2-kh tt. T. 1. SPb, 2003.
18. Timofeeva O. G. Tsennosti kul'tury: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt // Problema tsennostey v gumani-
19. tarnykh distsiplinakh. M., 2009. – S. 107-108.
20. Beard Ch. A. An Economis Interpretation of Constitution of the United States. New York, 1913.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
