MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Kozolupenko, D. P.
Concerning Specific Nature of ‘Ancient’ or ‘Primitive’ Mythology: Poetic
and Socio-Psychological Approaches to Research of Myth
// Philosophy and Culture.
2012. № 8.
P. 69-85.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61255
Kozolupenko, D. P. Concerning Specific Nature of ‘Ancient’ or ‘Primitive’ Mythology: Poetic
and Socio-Psychological Approaches to Research of Myth
Abstract:
The author describes the two main approaches in myth research: poetic (interpretative) and
socio-psychological. As a part of the first approach, the author describes the three concepts originating in the
Ancient World and still being used with some alternations nowadays. All of them have the same drawback:
they are principally interpretive which is unacceptable when related to a myth. The advantage of the second
approach is that there is an attempt to interpret myth not on the basis of research logics but to define relations
and objective laws typical for mythological world perception. These laws and relations may seem awkward
to a modern European but this approach tries to understand what role it could have played in the primitive
society as well as what psychological and social functions the myth had.
Keywords:
cultural studies, myth, mythopoetics, specific nature, world perception, research, interpretation, logic, symbol, archetype.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Buslaev F.I. Narodnaya poeziya. Istoricheskie ocherki. SPb, 1887.
2. Buslaev F.I. O vliyanii khristianstva na slavyanskiy yazyk. Opyt istorii yazyka po Ostromirovu Evangeliyu. M., 1848.
3. Vundt V. Mif i religiya. SPb, 1912.
4. Gete I.-V. Izbr. filos. sochineniya. M., 1964.
5. Devidson B. Afrikantsy. Vvedenie v istoriyu kul'tury. M.: Nauka, 1975.
6. Karleyl' T. Startor Resartus // Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoy esteticheskoy mysli. T. 3. M., 1967. S. 851.
7. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M.: Ateist, 1930.
8. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo. Sushchnost'. M., 1994. S. 5-217.
9. Losev A.F. Mif — razvernutoe magicheskoe imya... // Losev A.F. Mif. Chislo Sushchnost'. M., 1994. S. 217-233.
10. Malinovskiy B. Mif v primitivnoy psikhologii // Malinovskiy B. Magiya. Nauka. Religiya. M.: Refl-buk, 1998.
11. Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.
12. Toporkov A.L. Teoriya mifa v russkoy filologicheskoy nauke XIX veka. M., 1997.
13. Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1989.
14. Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb: Lan', 1998.
15. Shchepkin D.M. Ob istochnikakh i formakh russkogo basnosloviya. M., 1859-1861. T. 1.
16. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-Press, 1995.
17. Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Kiev, 1996
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
