Ñòàòüÿ 'Êîíöåïöèÿ ñïðàâåäëèâîñòè Äæîíà Ðîëçà' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Ismailov, N. O. John Rawls’ Theory of Justice

Abstract: The author of the present article analyzes the main ideas shared by John Rawls in his book ‘A Theory of Justice’. John Rawl was one of the most famous modern philosophers who studied justice. The author of the article also studies the principles of distributive justice. The author also provides a brief analysis of the main ideas and conclusions made by Rawls in his later theory of political liberalism. The author views Rawls’ views as reflecting the reality of the modern society and tries to find particular points in Rawls’ theory that could have been used for the implementation of the principles of justice in the modern society. The author studies the problem of justice from the point of view of the unity of all spheres of social life, causal and functional relations and interconnection of needs, interests and values. Rawls’ theory is viewed as the ‘contract theory’. Theoretical ground of Rawls’ theory of justice is the deontological liberalism. Rawls’ theory has certain advantages, for example, his recommended measures to achieve the social consent, and disadvantages: the author does not see any interdependence between the must and the benefit, needs, interests and values or relation between the main spheres of social life and economic and ideological relations in Rawls’ studies.


Keywords:

justice, freedom, equality, deontology, the must, needs, interests, values, benefit, social contract.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. O. V. Petrenko Kontseptsiya prav budushchikh pokoleniy v mezhdunarodnom i natsional'nom prave: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy // Pravo i politika.-2011.-12.-C. 2077-2083.
2. N.I. Kudrinskaya Aksiologicheskie osnovaniya spravedlivosti // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-1.-C. 71-79.
3. Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti: konstitutsionno-pravovoy i filosofsko-pravovoy analiz // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-2.-C. 1-46. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.2.10985. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10985.html
4. Ezeeva I.R. Neravenstva dokhodov v Rossii // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie.-2013.-3.-C. 1-6. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.3.8837. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_8837.html
5. Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noy spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 301-350. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.661. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
6. G.Yu. Kanarsh Teoriya spravedlivosti v zerkale natsional'nogo kharaktera (o nekotorykh zapadnykh i rossiyskikh osobennostyakh moral'nogo myshleniya). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 93-102.
7. Lapaeva V.V. Privatizatsiya sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti kak konstitutsionno-pravovaya problema // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 140-152. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10901.
8. Rawls J., Political Liberalism. New-York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
9. Rawls J., A Theory of Justice || «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 18 – 52.
10. Rolz D. Teoriya spravedlivosti. – Novosibirsk, Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta. 1995. 536 s.
11. Lessnoff M. H., Capitalism, Socialism and Justice / «Social Justice and Distribution». New-York, 1978, p. 139-149.
12. Kovalev A.M. Spravedlivoe obshchestvo – utopiya ili vozmozhnost'. M., Sovremennye tetradi, 2005. – 698 s.
13. Ismailov N. O. Spravedlivost' kak mera ravenstva // Sotsiologiya vlasti. M., 2009, ¹ 8. S. 95-103.
14. Kashnikov B. N. Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii. – Velikiy Novgorod, NovGu. 2004. – 260 s.
15. Ismailov N. O. K voprosu o sootnoshenii spravedlivosti i nravstvennosti // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki.-Rostov-na-Donu, 2010, ¹ 1. S. 25 – 29.
16. Guseynov A. A. Chto takoe etika nenasiliya? // Idei nenasiliya v XXI veke: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo gos. tekh. un-ta, 2006. S. 10–18.
17. Gavrilova I. N. Zapadnye traktovki sotsial'noy spravedlivosti: obzor kontseptsiy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. ¹ 3. S. 36-44.
18. S. E. Samenkova. Spravedlivost': ideya, norma, real'nost'. // Pravo i politika.-2012.-¹ 8.-C. 1400-1404.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.