|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
International relations
Reference:
Sychenko E.V.
The UN Human Rights Committee's remarks on Russia of March 31, 2015: their legal status and the problem of protection of human rights in Eastern Ukraine
// International relations.
2015. № 3.
P. 313-317.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2015.3.14900 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14900
Замечания Комитета ООН по правам человека к России, принятые 31 марта 2015 года: их правовой статус и проблема защиты прав человека на территории Восточной Украины
Sychenko Elena Vyacheslavovna
PhD in Law
Doctoral Candidate, department of Labor Law, University of Catania; Senior Educator, department of Civil Legal Disciplines, State Institute of Economics, Finance, Law and Technologies
188300, Russia, g. Gatchina, ul. K. Marksa, 36
|
e.sychenko@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2015.3.14900
Received:
03-04-2015
Published:
09-08-2015
Abstract:
The article considers the remarks of the UN Human Rights Committee on the report of the Russian Federation about the fulfillment of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Committee noted the positive changes which had taken place in the country since the previous report and formulated the remarks and recommendations to the Russian Federation. Special attention in the paper is paid to the legal position of the Committee about the efficiency of Russian control over the territory of the self-proclaimed republics of Eastern Ukraine and to the conclusion about the necessity of the efficient realization of the Committee’s considerations in Russia. The study is based on the analysis of the legal provisions of the Human Rights Committee and the foreign literature devoted to the legal status of its provisions. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that this is the first translation and analysis of the remarks of the Committee on the report of the Russian Federation adopted on March 31, 2015. The author enumerates pluses and minuses of the remarks.
Keywords:
discrimination, freedom of association, independence of judiciary, freedom of expression, international covenant, report, human rights committee, UNO, racism, status of conclusions
References
1. Human rights Committee, Concluding observations on the seventh periodic report of the Russian Federation, dostupen po adresu: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=897&Lang=en
2. Novak M. Mezhdunarodnyi pakt o grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh // Khanski R., Suksi M. (red.) Vvedenie v voprosy mezhdunarodnoi zashchity prav cheloveka. Uchebnoe posobie. Turku. 1999. S. 87.
3. Manov B.G. OON i sodeistvie osushchestvleniyu soglashenii o pravakh cheloveka. M., 1986. S. 94.
4. A.M. Solntsev, A.E. Koneva, Yuridicheskii status aktov dogovornykh organov po pravam cheloveka v natsional'nykh pravovykh sistemakh. "mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie", 2013, n 4.
5. Sm., naprimer, Zaklyuchitel'nye zamechaniya, prinyatye na poslednei 53 sessii Komiteta. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=965&Lang=en (dostup 05.04.2015).
6. Dostupno po adresu: https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/russian/gencomm/Rhrcom33.html (dostup 04.04.20015).
7. Panova E.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy deyatel'nosti komiteta po pravam cheloveka: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Moskva. 2005. S. 22.
8. P. Alston, 'The Historical Origins of the Concept of "General Comments" in Human Rights Law' in L. Boisson de Chazournes and V. Gowland Debbas (eds.), The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality: Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001),p. 764.
9. Sm. primery, S.S. Dikman, Yuridicheskaya priroda reshenii komiteta OON po pravam cheloveka: osnovnye problemy. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiiskoi akademii nauk № 1/2010 Moskva, 2010 g. S. 75-87.
10. Solntsev A.M., Koneva A.E. Yuridicheskii status aktov dogovornykh organov po pravam cheloveka v natsional'nykh pravovykh sistemakh // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie.-M: Institut prava i publichnoi politiki, 2013, №4. S. 87.
11. Sm. Dominic McGoldric, Extraterritorial application Of The International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights in Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, edited by Fons Coomans, Menno T. Kamminga. Intersentia, 2004. P. 41-72.
12. Doklad Spetsial'nogo dokladchika po voprosu o polozhenii v oblasti prav cheloveka na palestinskikh territoriyakh, okkupirovannykh s 1967 goda. Na russkom yazyke dostupen po adresu: http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain/opendocpdf.pdf?reldoc=y&docid=47317e132 (dostup 04.04.2015).
13. ESPCh, Bankovich i drugie protiv Bel'gii, Chekhii, Danii, Frantsii, Germanii, Gretsii, Vengrii, Islandii, Italii, Lyuksemburga, Niderlandov, Norvegii, Pol'shi, Portugalii, Ispanii, Turtsii I Velikobritanii (52207/99) REShENIE PO VOPROSU PRIEMLEMOSTI 12 dekabrya 2001 g
14. Nado otmetit', chto v 2011 godu ESPCh peresmotrel svoi pozitsii po povodu ekstra-territorial'nogo primeneniya EKPCh i ustanovil kriterii, kotorym dolzhen otvechat' kontrol' gosudarstva nad territoriei drugogo gosudarstva. Sm. Shanta Bkhavnani, ESPCh rasshiryaet sferu primeneniya Konventsii za predely Soveta Evropy. Byulleten' EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY CENTRE. ZIMA 2011 VYPUSK 2(9), s. 1.
15. S. N. Belyasov Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sfere zashchite prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Pravo i politika.-2011.-11.-C. 1916-1923.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
