Статья 'Роль национальной идентичности в международных отношениях на современном этапе' - журнал 'Международные отношения' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International relations
Reference:

Kuznetsova, A.I. The role of national identity in the international relations at the current stage

Abstract: This article includes an evaluation of the national identity factor in the global policy and international relations. It is noted that national identity facilitates definition of the development vector of a nation in a political space, and the identification differences are able to cause intensive and socially dangerous international conflicts. The co-related development of national self-conscience and the formation of the culture of the particular people is formed within the system of relations with other peoples. At the first stages of the social evolution the relations between the peoples form one of the important factors for the formation and development of national identity and culture. It is through the contact and relations between literally peoples (as groups of humans) that the process of formation of a human being starts.


Keywords:

political science, national security, international relations, politics, conflict, identity, nationalism, state, global economy.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Nazaretyan A.P. Chelovecheskiy intellekt v razvivayushcheysya vselennoy: istoki, stanovlenie, perspekti-vy. M., 1990.
2. Kubbel' L.E. Ocherki potestarno-politicheskoy etnografii. M., 1998.
3. Aratanovskiy S.N. Etnotsentrizm i «vozvrat» k etnichnosti: kontseptsiya i deystvitel'nost'. — Etno-graficheskoe obozrenie. 1992. № 3.
4. Mify narodov mira. M., 1985. T. 1.
5. Shibutani T. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. M., 1969.
6. Glebova I.I Obrazy proshlogo v strukture politicheskoy kul'tury Rossii: dis. na soisk. uch. st. ... d.p.n. M., 2007.
7. Lukin A.V. Medved' nablyudaet za drakonom. Obraz Kitaya v Rossii v XVII-XXI vv. M., 2007
8. Mostovaya I.V., Skorpik A.P. Arkhetipy i orientiry rossiyskoy mental'nosti // POLIS. 1995. № 4. S. 72.
9. Lenolla E. Malaya natsiya i natsional'noe samosoznanie v sovremennom mire. Finlyandiya, Khel'sinki, 1993.
10. Selivanov F.M. Bogatyrskiy epos russkogo naroda. Byliny. M., 1988.
11. Rybin F.N. Sovremennaya vneshnepoliticheskaya doktrina Pol'shi i natsional'noe samosoznanie polya-kov (politologicheskiy analiz). M., 2003.
12. Zadokhin A.G., Nizovskiy A.Yu. Porokhovoy pogreb Evropy. M., 2002.
13. Zadokhin A.G. Politicheskie protsessy na periferii Evrazii. M., 1998.
14. Chudodeev Yu.V., Katkova Z.D. Kitay — Yaponiya: lyubov' ili nenavist'? M., 1995.
15. The Chinese and Japanese. Essay in Political Interactions. ED. By Akira Iriya. Princeton. 1980.
16. Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya mo-del'. // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2012. №3. S. 89-92.
17. Manoylo A.V. Interesy vneshney politiki SShA v Afganistane // Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. 2012. №3. S. 76-81.
18. Mak-Kleyn Dzh.L. Yaponiya ot segunata Tokugavy — v XXI vek. M., 2007.
19. Syumpey Okamoto. Yaponskaya oligarkhiya v russko-yaponskoy voyne. M., 2003.
20. Kartseva E. Tri litsa imidzha, ili Koe-chto ob iskusstve vnusheniya // Inostrannaya literatura. 1971. № 9.
21. Toporov B.H. O kosmologicheskikh istochnikakh ranneistoricheskikh opisaniy // Trudy po znakovym siste-mam (T3C). T. YI, UZ TGU. Vyp. 308. Tartu, 1973.
22. Zhivov B.M. O vnutrenney i vneshney pozitsii pri izuchenii modeliruyushchikh sistem. Vtorichnye mode-liruyushchie sistemy. Tartu. 1979.
23. Lotman Yu.M. Bytovoe povedenie i tipologiya kul'tury v Rossii XVIII v. // Kul'turnoe nasledie drev-ney Rusi. Istoki. Stanovlenie. Traditsii. M., 1976.
24. Malakhov B.C. Natsionalizm kak politicheskaya ideologiya. M., 2005.
25. Tosaka Dzyun. Yaponskaya ideologiya. M., 1991.
26. Tsymburskiy V.L. Chelovek politicheskiy mezhdu Ratio i otvetami na stimuly (K ischisleniyu kognitiv-nykh tipov prinyatiya resheniy) // POLIS. 1995. № 5.
27. Gurevich A.Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul'tury. M., 1984.
28. Chudodeev Yu.V., Katkova Z.D. Kitay-Yaponiya: lyubov' i nenavist'? M., 1995.
29. Razuvaev V.V. Simvolicheskie obrazy v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. — Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 1994. №. 1. S. 64.
30. Lakh 3. Polyaki i ikh sosedi // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1992. № 4.
31. Yaponiya i mirovoe soobshchestvo: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty internatsionalizatsii. M., 1994.
32. Bazhanov B.A. Refleksiya v sovremennom naukovedenii // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. 2002. T. 2. № 2.
33. Lefevr B.A. Proschety mirotvorchestva. — Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. 2002. T. 2. № 2.
34. Informatsiya. Diplomatiya. Psikhologiya. M., 2002
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.