Ñòàòüÿ 'Ïîñòñîâåòñêèå íåçàâèñèìûå ãîñóäàðñòâà: ïîèñê ôîðìû ïðàâëåíèÿ' - æóðíàë 'Ìåæäóíàðîäíûå îòíîøåíèÿ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International relations
Reference:

Ïîñòñîâåòñêèå íåçàâèñèìûå ãîñóäàðñòâà: ïîèñê ôîðìû ïðàâëåíèÿ

Egorov Vladimir Georgievich

Doctor of History



101000, Moscow, ul. Polyanka Bol'shaya, 7/10, str. 3

9315891@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2014.1.9798

Received:

18-12-1969


Published:

1-1.5-2014


References
1. Glebova I.I. Osobennosti evolyutsii gosudarstva v Rossii: «Dvorets» // Rossiya i sovremennyi mir. – 2011. – ¹70(1) . – C. 84-112.
2. Evraziiskii monitoring. Mezhdunarodnyi fond gumanitarnogo sotrudnichestva. – M., 2009.
3. Evraziiskii monitoring. Zima 2012/2013gg. – M., 2012.
4. Linetskii A.F. Rossiiskie instituty politicheskogo predstavitel'stva v usloviyakh obshchestvennykh transformatsii. Opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza. – SPb, 2008. –375c.
5. Moiseev S. Iskushenie superprezidentskoi sistemoi // Pro et Contra. – 1992. – ¹3. – C.74 – 86.
6. Mukhamedzhanov B.A. Forma pravleniya Respubliki Kazakhstan: Konstitutsionnaya model' i praktika gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. – M, 2006. – 51c.
7. O’Donnel G. Delegativnaya demokratiya // Predely vlasti. – M., 1994. –¹2-3. –C.55-61.
8. Petrukhina M.A. Konstitutsionnyi dizain i konsolidatsiya demokratii v stranakh tret'ei volny demokratizatsii // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – ¹3. – S.214-247.
9. Pliskevich N.M. Kakaya Konstitutsiya nuzhna Rossii? // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 2013. – ¹1. – S. 55-76.
10. Trepavlov V.V. Zolotaya Orda v XIV stoletii. – M., 2010. – 72c.
11. Kharitonova O.G. Prezidentstvo i demokratiya: sostoyanie diskussii // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – ¹3. – S.199-213.
12. Khomyakov D.A. Pravoslavie. Samoderzhavie. Narodnost'. – M., 2011. –576c.
13. Bagehot W. The English Constitution: The Cabinet / Lijphart A. Parliamentary versus. Presidential Government. – Oxford University Press, 1994. – P.66-72.
14. Elgie R. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. – Oxford University Press. – 1999. – 320p.
15. Johannsen L. The constitution and democracy. The choice and consequence of the constitution in postcommunist countries. – Aarhus, Denmark: Politica, 2000. – 231p.
16. Johannsen L., Norgaard O. IPA: The index of presidential authority. Explorations into the measurement of impact of a political institution. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops. – Edinburgh, UK, 2003. – April.
17. Heilman, J. Constitutions and economic reform in the postcommunist transitions. / J. Sachs and K. Pistor. The rule of law and economic reform in Russia. – Boulder, CO: Westview, 1997.
18. Kantor H. Efforts Made by Various Latin American Countries to Limit the Power of the President // Lijphart A. Parliamentary versus. Presidential Government. – Oxford University Press, 1994.
19. Lijphart A. Democracies Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. – New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.
20. Lijphart A. Presidentialism and Majoritarian Democracy: Theoretical Observations / Linz J., Valenzuela A. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. – Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994. – P. 91-105.
21. Linz J. Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference / Linz J., Valenzuela A. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Comparative Perspectives. – Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994. – P.3-91.
22. Mainwaring, S. Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: The difficult combination // Comparative Political Studies. – 1993. – ¹26(2). – P.198-228.
23. Mainwaring S. Transition to democracy and democratic consolidation: Theoretical and comparative issues // Mainwaring S., G.O’Donnell, Valenzuela J. S. Issues in democratic consolidation: The new South American democracies in comparative perspective Notre Dame. – University of Notre Dame Press, 1992. – P.294-341.
24. Norris, P. Designing democracies: Institutional arrangements and system support. Paper presented at the Workshop on Confidence in Democratic Institutions: America in Comparative Perspective. – Washington, DC: J. F. Kennedy School of Government. – 1997, August.
25. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F. Democracy and development. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
26. Przeworski A., Alvarez M., Cheibub J. A., Limongi F. What makes democracies endure? // Journal of Democracy. – 1996. – ¹7(1) . – P.39-55.
27. Schlesinger A. Leave the Constitution Alone / Lijphart A. Parliamentary versus residential Government. – Oxford University Press. – 1994. – P.90-94.
28. Siaroff A. Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. // European Journal of Political Research. – 2003. – ¹42. – P. 287-312.
29. Siaroff A. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies international Political Science Review. – 2003. – ¹24(4) . – P.445-464.
30. Stepan A., Skach S. Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation? Parliamentarism versus presidentialism // World Politics. – 1993. – ¹46(1). – P.1-22.
31. Wilson W. Committee or Cabinet Government? / Lijphart A. Parliamentary versus. Presidential Government. – Oxford University Press, 1994. – P.72-74.
32. http://www.georgianpress.ru/geo-press/10632-gosudarstvennyy-stroy-v-gruzii-mozhet-vnov-izmenitsya.html
33. http://news.day.az/tconomy/420267.html
34. http://tengrinews.kz/europe/v-gruzii-vveli-smeshannuyu-formu-pravleniya-68080
35. Borodin E.A. Tsentral'naya Aziya kak geostrategicheskii proekt, obespechivayushchii dolgosrochnye interesy Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 1 - 17. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9090.html
36. Manoilo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiiskaya model' // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 32 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2012.1.279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html
37. Rep'eva A.M. Natsiestroitel'stvo. Formirovanie i sushchnostnye kharakteristiki (SShA i Rossiya). // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 68 - 79. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_8795.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.