MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Zheldybina T.A.
Judicial practice and legal precedent: acceptance as the source of law in light of modernization of lawmaking in Russia
// Law and Politics.
2016. № 8.
P. 1060-1067.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.8.12775 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12775
Судебная практика и судебный прецедент: приемлемость в качестве источника права в свете модернизации законотворчества в России
Zheldybina Tat'yana Anatol'evna
PhD in Law
Docent, department of the Theory of State and Law, Saratov State Law Academy
410004, Russia, g. Saratov, ul. Vol'skaya, 1, kab. 209
|
tatyana130802@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.8.12775
Received:
03-08-2014
Published:
31-08-2016
Abstract:
The problem of judicial lawmaking is one of the relevant for the modern legal science. The subject of this research is judicial practice and legal precedent as the possible, acceptable, and valid sources of Russian law. The goal of this work consists in development of the theoretical positions, which contain substantiation of the importance of the official recognition of judicial practice and legal precedent as the sources of law in the conditions of promotion of the judicial reform along with the work on harmonization of legislation. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is first to examine a complex of questions pertaining to inclusion of the judicial practice and legal precedent into the ranks of the sources of law in light of modernization of the Russian lawmaking. The author suggests theoretical positions and practical recommendations which allow developing the doctrine of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russia.
Keywords:
Judicial legal provisions, Law enforcement, Judicial authority, Globalization of law, Internationalization of legislation, Sources of law, Lawmaking, Prejudice, Legal precedent, Judicial practice
References
1. Balasanyan A.R. Sootnoshenie obychaya delovogo oborota s sudebnym pretsedentom i sudebnoi praktikoi // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. № 3(31.
2. Bodrov S.Yu. Sudebnyi pretsedent v sisteme istochnikov rossiiskogo prava: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 2004.
3. Brezhnev V. E. Sudebnyi pretsedent v Rossii: polemika i predlozheniya // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2011. Vyp. 9.
4. Voitovich E.P. Sudebnaya praktika v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2006.
5. Dzhura V. V. O sudebnom pretsedente v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik. 2005. № 2.
6. Zor'kin V.D. Pretsedentnyi kharakter reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2004. № 12.
7. Krasina E.N. Mezhdunarodnyi sudebnyi pretsedent kak element modernizatsii pravovoi sistemy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi Akademii advokatury i notariata.2011. № 1(20).
8. Lazarev V.V. Normativnaya priroda sudebnogo pretsedenta // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2012. № 4.
9. Malyshev Kr. Kurs obshchego grazhdanskogo prava Rossii. T.1. SPb., 1880.
10. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeiskoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
11. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnyi pretsedent: raznoobrazie ponyatii i mnogoobrazie form proyavleniya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2006. № 6.
12. Neshataeva T.N. K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava – sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2000. № 5 (90).
13. Smirnova M.G. Pravopolozheniya sudebnoi praktiki kak netipichnyi istochnik prava // Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal.2006. № 1.
14. Usanov V.E. Sudebnyi pretsedent: problemy konvergentsii v rossiiskuyu pravovuyu sistemu // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2008. № 2(7).
15. Fetishchev D. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Nauchno-analiticheskii zhurnal Obozrevatel'-Observer. 2008. № 5.
16. Markov P.V. Usloviya osushchestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya v stranakh kontinental'noi i anglosaksonskoi pravovoi sem'i // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-№ 4.-S.73-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_318.html
17. Romanova E.V.. Sudebnaya doktrina kak istochnik (forma) prava v nalogovom prave SShA // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
18. V. A. Oganesyan. Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyi istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
19. N. Yu. Erpyleva. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i formirovanie istochnikov mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
20. Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753
21. R. A. Gurbanov Vzaimodeistvie organov pravosudiya
gosudarstv-chlenov ES s organami
pravosudiya Evropeiskogo soyuza // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 128 - 143.
22. Sokolov T.V. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo – mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoi vlasti?!. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 313 - 325. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.11168.
23. S.V. Kodan Formirovanie istochnikovedeniya istorii
gosudarstva i prava Rossii
(XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 649 - 661. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.14.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
