Статья 'Исследование новых доказательств в суде апелляционной инстанции' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Исследование новых доказательств в суде апелляционной инстанции

Panokin Aleksandr Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

Lawyer, Moscow Collegium of Advocates "Advocacy Partnership"; Docent, the department of Criminal Procedural Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street 9

ampanokin@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2016.7.13290

Received:

13-10-2014


Published:

27-07-2016


Abstract: This work studies the issues of proof in the court of appeals, namely the questions of examination of new evidence, which received the assessment of the court of first instance, examinations on file that were not examined by the court of first instance, as well as examinations by the same rules of new evidence presented by the parties. An important place belongs to the analysis of the normative legal regulations and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of appeal of a number of the constituents of the Russian Federation on the issue of examination of new evidence in the courts of appeal. The author makes a conclusion on the need to overcome the current practice of hearing of a case in a court of appeals without examination of evidence, which does not allow to increase the level of legal protection of rights, freedoms, and legal interests of citizens and organizations involved in the sphere of criminal procedure that are guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws.


Keywords:

Cassation, Additional materials, Examination of evidence, Verification of evidence, Proof, New evidence, Evidence, Court of appeals, Court of first instance, Appeal

References
1. Apellyatsiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie//red.: Ershov V. V. M., 2013. 352 S.
2. Afanas'eva S. I., Borisevich, G. Ya., Dobrovlyanina, O. V. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k glave 45.1 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii «Proizvodstvo v sude apellyatsionnoi instantsii». Perm', 2014. 84 S.
3. Ashirbekova M. T. Novye dokazatel'stva v sude apellyatsionnoi instantsii//Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 5. S. 22-24.
4. Budnikov V. L. Uchastie suda v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii//Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2006. № 1. S. 13-15//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
5. Voskobitova L. A. Apellyatsiya – printsipial'no novyi institut v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy. M., 2013. S. 35-42.
6. Voskobitova L. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy apellyatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2013. № 12 (37). S. 1619-1624.
7. Golovkov V. L. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 314 S.
8. Diner A. A., Martynyakhin L. F., Senin N. N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2003. 112 S.
9. Panokin A. M. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2013. № 4 (29). S. 483-490.
10. Panokin A. M. Poryadok rassmotreniya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii v ugolovnom protsesse//Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2013. № 11 (36). S. 1461-1465.
11. Petrukhin I. L. Zapret povorota k khudshemu v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. № 3. S. 46-53.
12. Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh reshenii v kontrol'no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii: monografiya//red.: Zaitsev O. A. M., 2012. 376 S.
13. Smirnov A. V. Reforma poryadka peresmotra sudebnykh reshenii po ugolovnym delam: apellyatsiya//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 2011.
14. Solov'eva N. A., Trishina N. T. Yuridiko-fakticheskaya proverka prigovora v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve: monografiya. M., 2013. 184 S.
15. Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudei. M., 2013. 336 S.
16. Shmeleva E. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie apellyatsionnogo proizvodstva v sovremennom rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. Orenburg, 2009. 322 S
17. D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' — universal'nyi printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 4
18. N. I. Manyak Obzhalovanie sudebnykh aktov
v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2047 - 2052.

19. Afanas'yadi V.G. Realizatsiya rezul'tatov
operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti
v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam
o nezakonnom usynovlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 811 - 814. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9283.

20. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
21. Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.
22. N. I. Manyak Obzhalovanie sudebnykh aktov
v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2047 - 2052.

23. Afanas'yadi V.G. Realizatsiya rezul'tatov
operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti
v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam
o nezakonnom usynovlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 811 - 814. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9283.

24. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
25. Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.