|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Skorobogatov A., Krasnov A.V.
Legal reality as a category of juridical science
// Law and Politics.
2016. № 7.
P. 934-940.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.7.13314 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13314
Правовая реальность как категория юридической науки
Skorobogatov Andrey
Doctor of History
Professor, Chair of Theory of State and Law and Public-Law Discipline, Institute of Economics, Management and Law (Kazan).
420111, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan', ul. Moskovskaya, 42
|
askorobogatov@rambler.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Krasnov Aleksandr Valer'evich
PhD in Law
Docent, the department of Theory and Hisotry of State and Law, Kazan Branch of the Russian Academy of Justice
420136, Russia, Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Musina Street 74
|
|
field08@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.7.13314
Received:
15-10-2014
Published:
27-07-2016
Abstract:
This article is dedicated to the juridical meaning of the category of “legal reality”, introduced into the scientific use within the framework of post-classical juridical science. The goal of this work is to study the “legal reality” as a category of juridical science, determine and analyze the ontological and gnoseological meaning of this concept, which defines the bases for functionality of the legal phenomena in a specific society. The legal reality is being examined from the positions of various methodological approaches, which allows seeing it not only on different ontological levels and aspects, but to also determine its gnoseological potential for development of juridical science. The author gives an original definition to the category of “legal reality” and original definition is given to the category of “legal reality”. The author studies the key element and aspects of this category, and makes a conclusion that the legal reality as a fundamental category of juridical science is a complexly organized multi-level system, which encompasses both, the realistically existing legal phenomena, as well as the legal ideal, and defines the sphere of being of the law for the individual and society.
Keywords:
Anthropological legal research, Juridical science, Methodological pluralism, Post-classical scientific reality, Post-modernistic legal concepts, Legal phenomenon, Legal science , Being of law, Category of juridical science, Legal reality
References
1. Campos A.S. Aquinas's lex iniusta non est lex: a Test of Legal Validity // Source: Archiv fuer Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie. – 2014. – Vol. 100. – # 3. – P. 366-378(13). – URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/fsv/arsp/2014/00000100/00000003/art00006.
2. Sherwin R.K. The Narrative Construction of Legal Reality // Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors. – 2009. – Vol. 6. – P. 93-94.
3. Tyler J. A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity. Dissertation.-Texas A7M University (2012) URL: http://philpapers.org/rec/TYLAPS.
4. Van Hoeske M. Law as Communication.-Oxford-Portland Oregon, 2002.
5. Barsukov A.Yu. Pravovoi progress kak yuridicheskaya kategoriya: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk.-Saratov: Saratov, gosud. akad. prava, 2004.
6. Bol'shakov E.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya problemy pravovoi real'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki.-Tambov: Gramota, 2013.-№ 6 (32).-Ch. 2.-C.40-43.
7. Demidov A.I. Pravovedenie: ot metodologicheskogo anarkhizma k metodologicheskomu plyuralizmu // Gosudarstvo i pravo na rubezhe vekov: Problemy teorii i istorii (materialy Vserossiiskoi konferentsii). – M.: Izd-vo IGiP RAN, 2001. – S. 125-130.
8. Krasnov A.V. Soderzhanie sanktsii norm prava v kontekste printsipa uvazheniya prav cheloveka // Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 164-169.
9. Krasnov A.V. Soderzhanie sanktsii norm prava v svete informatsionno-psikhologicheskogo podkhoda k issledovaniyu pravovykh yavlenii // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 226-233
10. Kret O.V. Pravovaya real'nost': ontologo-gnosseologicheskii analiz. Avtoref. diss. … kand. filos. nauk. Tambov: Tambov. gosud. un-t, 2007..
11. Maksimov S.I. Pravovaya real'nost': opyt filosofskogo osmysleniya. – Khar'kov: Pravo, 2002.
12. Polyakov A.V. Kommunikativnaya kontseptsiya prava (genezis i teoretiko-pravovoe obosnovanie). Diss… dokt. yurid. nauk. – SPb.: SPbGU, 2002.
13. Skorobogatov A.V. Integral'nyi kharakter sovremennogo rossiiskogo pravoponimaniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 3.-S.1-11. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.3.11127. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11127.html
14. Skorobogatov A.V. Kontsept «pravo» v rossiiskom yuridicheskom diskurse // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2013.-№ 4(28). – S. 233 – 240.
15. Skorobogatov A.V. Faktory formirovaniya pravovoi real'nosti Rossii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. – 2014.-№ 8.-S. 1572 – 1576.
16. Slobodnyuk S.L. Pravovaya real'nost' i krizis pravosoznaniya. – Saarbrücken, Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
17. Syrykh V.M. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoi nauki: uchebnik.-M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. – S. 38.
18. Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoi nauki. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gumanitarnogo un-ta, 2001.
19. Timofeev A.V. Yuridicheskii opyt problemy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Yaroslavl': Yaroslav. gosud. un-t, 2008.
20. Gulyaikhin V.N. K voprosu o metodologii dissertatsionnykh rabot v yuridicheskoi nauke // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 1. - C. 92 - 106. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10.html
21. A. V. Stovba A. RAINAKh I N.N. ALEKSEEV:
U ISTOKOV FENOMENOLOGII PRAVA // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 371 - 376.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
