Категория 'источник права': проблемы универсальности, особенности, конкретности (опыт осмысления подходов дореволюционных ученых)

Ельчанинова Ольга Юрьевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0706.2016.6.13941


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Law and Politics

Reference:

El'chaninova O.Y. The category of the “source of law”: the problems of universality, specificity, and concretization (the experience of understanding of the approaches of pre-revolutionary scholars) // Law and Politics. 2016. № 6. P. 813-821. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.6.13941 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13941

Категория "источник права": проблемы универсальности, особенности, конкретности (опыт осмысления подходов дореволюционных ученых)

El'chaninova Ol'ga Yur'evna

PhD in History

Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

443115, Russia, Samarskaya oblast, g. Samara, ul. Demokraticheskaya, 37, kv. 131

olga220169_69@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Legal and political thought"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2016.6.13941

Received:

07-12-2014

Published:

05-07-2016

Abstract: The object of this research is the basic category of legal science that is the “source of law”. The subject of this research is the main approaches devised by the historical and juridical sciences towards the concept of “source of law”. The author demonstrates that unlike in historical sciences, where the concept of “source of law” was examined only as a private case of the concept of “primary source”, in the legal science as a whole and law history in particular this is one of the fundamental categories. Among the main conclusions of the conducted research are the theses that the content of the definition of the “source of law” is influenced by the specific historical context, starting with the dominating legal tradition and ending with the value system that have been entrenched in the public consciousness of a specific era. The desire to move away from ambiguity of the concept of “source of law” led to emergence of new terms: “form of law”, “normative factor”, “monument of law”, and others.

Keywords:

source of law, customary law, historic Landmark, law, legislation, source of Russian law, form of law, normative act, legal practices, legal system

References

1. Belik V.N., Romanov I.B. Istoriko-teoreticheskie osobennosti vospriyatiya pravovogo obychaya v kachestve istochnika prava v Rossii // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 91-105.
2. Vladimirskii-Budanov M.F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. – SPb.-Kiev: Izdanie knigotorgovtsa N.Ya. Oglobina, 1905.
3. Zagoskin N.P. Istoriya prava russkogo naroda. T. 1. – Kazan': Tipo-litografiya Imperatorskogo universiteta, 1899.
4. Klyuchevskii V.O. Istochnikovedenie. Istochniki russkoi istorii // Soch.: V 9-ti t. – M., 1989. – T. VII.
5. Korkunov N.M. Obshchee uchenie o prave. – SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1908.
6. Leontovich F.I. Istoriya russkogo prava. – Odessa: Gorodskaya tipografiya sodruzhestva Aleksomati, 1869.
7. Mikhailenko N. M. Pravovoi obychai v sisteme istochnikov prava: Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya na primere pravovoi traditsii narodov Severnogo Kavkaza: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Krasnodar., 2010.
8. Moroshkin F. Uchenye trudy po chasti istorii russkogo zakonodatel'stva. – M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya, 1835.
9. Nevolin K.A. Entsiklopediya zakonovedeniya. T.2. – Kiev: Universitetskaya tipografiya, 1840.
10. Petrazhitskii L.I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriei nravstvennosti. T. II. – SPb.: Tipografiya M. Merkusheva, 1910.
11. Pushkarev L.N. Klassifikatsiya russkikh pis'mennykh istochnikov po otechestvennoi istorii. — M.: Nauka, 1975.
12. Sergeevich V.I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevnei istorii russkogo prava. – SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1910.
13. Taranovskii F.V. Predmet i zadacha tak nazyvaemoi vneshnei istorii prava // Zapiski russkogo nauchnogo instituta v Belgrade. Vypusk 1. Belgrad, 1930.
14. Taranovskii F.V. Uchebnik entsiklopedii prava. – SPb.: Tipografiya K. Mattisena, 1917.
15. Trofimov Ya.V., Krasnov S.Yu. Ponyatie «obychnoe pravo»: sovremennye tendentsii, perspektivy razvitiya v tsivilisticheskoi i drugikh yuridicheskikh naukakh // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Yurisprudentsiya. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 136-144.
16. Shershenevich G.F. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Vyp. 2. – M.: Izdanie brat'ev Bashmakovykh, 1910.
17. Yasinskii M.N. Lektsii po vneshnei istorii russkogo prava. – Kiev: Tipografiya imperatorskogo universiteta, 1898.
18. Golikov A. G. Ob''ektivnoe i sub''ektivnoe v istoricheskom poznanii s pozitsii istochnikovedeniya // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 24-28.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.