Статья 'Многообразие моделей модернизации и политизации религии: теоретические и практические аспекты. ' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Многообразие моделей модернизации и политизации религии: теоретические и практические аспекты.

drinova Elena mihajlovna

PhD in Philosophy

Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Volgograd State Socail-Pedagogical University

400131, Russia, g. Volgograd, ul. Pr. Lenina, 27

edrinova@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Pankratov Sergei Anatol'evich

Doctor of Politics

Professor, Head of the Department of Political Science Volgograd State University

400062, Russia, g. Volgograd, pr. Universitetskii, 100

c.pankratov@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.1.14235

Received:

16-01-2015


Published:

31-01-2015


Abstract: The article is shown the role of traditional institute of religion in classic and modern models spreading in political science in XX-XXI century. It is noted that in the classical modernization theory, the problem of politicization of religion has not been investigated, despite the fact that there was an extensive empirical data confirming this fact. Initially, the modernization associated with the secularization of public relations. The problem of politicization of religion becomes relevant under the "catch-up" model of modernization.It has argument that democratic reforms accompanies by the politicization of religion in West Europe and the US and later in those non-Western countries that have implemented partial modernization. Institutional factors are the political modernization of religious political parties. The biggest problem is the development of the politicization of religion was under the multiplicity of models of modernization. Emphasizes the role of traditional institutions in the modernization, such as religion and family. It is noted that the implementation of polyvariant models of modernization implies the entry level of Westernization. The article analyzes the national model of modernization, it is shown that the result of modernization transformations are often illiberal democracy. It is proved that the implementation of the national models of modernization are the fundamental principles of statism and traditionalism. Political practice shows that reliance on the "enlightened" authoritarian political elite groups and traditional institutes of religion and family are increasingly becoming the key to holding a national model of modernization. The author concludes that in the modernization of religion as a social institution is transformed and becomes part of the individual features of a political institution.


Keywords:

political modernization, national model of modernization, the politicization of religion, authoritarianism, clergy, democracy, sekulyarizatsiya, institution of the family, uncertainty Principle, the principle of subsidiarity

References
1. Zakariya F. Budushchee svobody: neliberal'naya demokratiya v SShA i za ikh predelami / F. Zakariya. – M.: Ladomir, 2003. – 356 s.
2. Drinova, E. M. Modernizatsiya i globalizatsiya: formirovanie lokal'nykh toposov politizatsii religii //Politika i obshchestvo. 2013. № 5 C. 619 – 629.
3. Nort D. Instituty i ekonomicheskii rost: istoricheskoe vvedenie / D. Nort // Tezis. T. 1. Vyp. 2. – M., 1993. – S. 73–74.
4. Opros VTsIOM, fevral' 2012g. URL: http: //wciom.ru /fileadmin /nayka /sovet /fedorov.pdf.
5. Tu Veimin. Mnozhestvennost' modernizatsii i posledstviya etogo yavleniya dlya Vostochnoi Azii// Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu. Pod red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii.. 2002. S. 237-257.
6. Khantington S. Tret'ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse KhKh veka. M., 2003. – 368 s.
7. Eizenshtadt Sh. Novaya paradigma modernizatsii / Sh. Eizenshtadt // Sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsii. M., 2001. S. 470-479.
8. Black C. E. The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History. N.Y., 1975. 468 r.
9. Zapf W. Modernization Theory – and the Non-Western World. URL: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/11036/ssoar-2004-zapf-modernization_theory_-_and_the.pdf?sequence=1. –
10. Hammond P. E. The Sacred in a Secular Agt Toward Revision in the Scientific Study of Religion.  Los Angeles: California University of California Press, 1985.  346r.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.