|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Starkin S.V., Krivov S.V.
Evolution and typology of the expert analytical centers of the European Union
// Law and Politics.
2016. № 8.
P. 1050-1059.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.8.16644 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16644
Эволюция и типология экспертно-аналитических центров Европейского Союза
Starkin Sergey Valer'evich
Doctor of Politics
Professor, the department of Political Science, Institute of International Relations and World History of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Leading Scientific Associate, International Interdisciplinary Laboratory "Study of Global and Regional Socio-Political Processes", N. A. Dobrolyubov State Linguistic University of Nizhny Novgorod
603000, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ul'yanova, 1, kab. 307
|
starkinserge@mail.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
Krivov Sergei Valer'evich
PhD in History
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University
Senior Researcher of the International Interdisciplinary Laboratory "Study of World and Regional Socio-Political Processes" of the Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N.A. Dobrolyubov
603000, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Gagarina, 23, of. 307
|
skrivov@rambler.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.8.16644
Received:
13-10-2015
Published:
31-08-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this article is the activity of the European expert analytical centers, which attracts substantiated academic interest in the area of applied and theoretical research. The relevance lies in the questions associated with the functional responsibilities of similar centers, their sponsorship, presence or absence of the ideological component, and most importantly, level of their influence upon the process of domestic and foreign policy decision-making. In the conditions of complicated circumstances in Russia-Europe relations, a more adequate understanding of the latent mechanisms of functioning of the European policy seems necessary. Due to this fact, the authors note the need for an in-depth analysis of the forms and active work of the EU oriented expert analytical centers. The authors made the following conclusions based on the analysis of the EU oriented expert analytical centers: in general, the increase of the number of expert centers complies with the extension of European integration and expansion of control; as a rule, the research of the analytical centers, correspond with the EU political realities and its impact upon the domestic legislation alongside the increased awareness of actions. The analytical centers located in Brussels and oriented exclusively towards EU were established at the time when EU member-states agreed to rejuvenate the European project, finish the internal market, and revisit the possibility of the economic and currency union. Naturally, the national expert analytical centers located in the EU member-states began developing more sequential versions of the research programs on the EU topic. It is evident that the national centers have captured the rising opportunity to affect the all-European political agenda and reacted with the activation of their own work.
Keywords:
analytical institutions , political expertise, political process, political technologies, lobbying, political planning, decision-making process, political forecast, political analysis, political elite
References
1. Grant C. Delors. Inside the House that Jacques Built. London: Nicholas Brealey, 1994.
2. Middlemas K. Orchestrating Europe: The Informal Politics of the European Union 1973-1995. London: Fontana, 1995. R. 568.
3. Cini M. The European Commission. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996. R. 188.
4. Ross G. Jacques Delors and European Integration. Cambridge: Polity, 1995. R. 61.
5. Grant C. Delors. Inside the House that Jacques Built. London: Nicholas Brealey, 1994.
6. Day A. Think Tanks in Western Europe / Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Action. McGann J., Weaver K. (eds.). London, 2000.
7. Haas P. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination // International Organisation. 1992. Vol. 46. № 1. R. 1-35.
8. European Commission, Directory of Interest Groups. Luxembourg: Official Office for Publications of the European Community, 1996.
9. Greenwood J. Representing Interests in the European Union. London: Macmillan, 1997. R. 128.
10. Poskrebysheva E.S., Starkin S.V. Vneshnepoliticheskaya strategiya «Soyuza pravykh sil» i prognozy Natsional'nogo razvedyvatel'nogo soveta SShA: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2011. № 2-3. S. 144-148.
11. Poskrebysheva E.S., Starkin S.V. Amerikanskii opyt formirovaniya pravoliberal'nykh vneshnepoliticheskikh strategii // Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2011. № 1 (15). S. 70-73.
12. Starkin S.V., Poskrebysheva E.S. Paradigma «glubinnoi ekologii» A.Neisa v kontekste razvitiya ekopolitologii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. № 4-1 (30). S. 164-168.
13. A.A. Borisenkov Politicheskaya zhizn' — sposob politicheskogo razvitiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 6. - C. 816 - 824. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.6.7213.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|