Ñòàòüÿ 'Îá îêîí÷àòåëüíîñòè ðåøåíèé Êîíñòèòóöèîííîãî ñóäà Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Balabkin, S.I. On the fi nality of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Abstract: The right to judicial protection includes a possibility to challenge any judicial decision, including the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court. The Constructional Court of the Russian Federation supported this position, however it also recognized the prohibition to challenge (review) its decision, and considered it to be constitutional. Analysis of the constitutional norms and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, to which this article is devoted, does not give any grounds for such an interpretation of constitutional norms.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, judicial reform, judicial system, the Constitutional Court, the constitutional judicial procedure, challenging the judicial decisions, right to judicial protection, fi nality of the decisions of the Constitutional Court, correcting the judicial mistake, review of judicial acts.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Berestnev Yu.Yu., Vinogradov M.V. «Praktika Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka: printsip pravovoy oprede-
2. lennosti ili quod licet jovi, non licet bovi?» // «Rossiyskaya yustitsiya», 2006, ¹11.
3. Zor'kin V.D. «Pretsedentnyy kharakter resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // «Zhurnal
4. rossiyskogo prava», 2004, ¹12.
5. Kononov A.L. «Pravo na osoboe mnenie» // «Zakon», 2006, ¹11.
6. «Konstitutsionnoe soveshchanie. Stenogrammy. Materialy. Dokumenty». M., 1995, t.1; 1996, t.18.
7. «Na vershine sudebnoy vlasti», interv'yu s V.D.Zor'kinym, gazeta «ezh-Yurist», 2006, ¹41.
8. Radchenko V.I. «Zakon «O sudebnoy sisteme Rossiyskoy Federatsii» - bazovyy zakon sudebnoy reformy» //
9. «Rossiyskaya yustitsiya», 2002, ¹8.
10. Rekhtina I.V. «Problemy unifikatsii norm, reguliruyushchikh proizvodstvo v poryadke nadzora v grazhdanskom pro-
11. tsesse» // «Rossiyskaya yustitsiya», 2006, ¹9.
12. Sultanov A.R. «O pravovoy opredelennosti i sudebnom normotvorchestve» // «Rossiyskaya yustitsiya», 2006, ¹3.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.