Статья 'Судебная практика как средство доказывания в гражданском и арбитражном процессах России' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Lyashkov, S.V. Judicial practice as means of proof in civil and arbitration processes in the Russian Federation.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the issue of of use of judicial practice as means of proof in civil and arbitration (commercial) judicial procedures. The study is based on analysis of vast judicial practice on this issue. The author shows goals and forms of use of judicial practice, its value for the court, provides “pros” and “contras” of accepting judicial practice as means of proof. As a result the author comes to a conclusion that it is possible to use judicial practice as means of proof together with the traditional types of evidence.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, court, form, type, practice, means, evidence, arbitration, process, decision.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Agarkov M.M. Primenenie sovetskim sudom inostrannogo zakona / Problemy sotsialisticheskogo prava. M.,
2. 1938.
3. Amosov S. Predmet dokazyvaniya v arbitrazhnom protsesse // KhiP. 1997. №9.
4. Vaneeva L.A. Sudebnoe poznanie v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse. Vladivostok, 1972.
5. Gurvich M.A. Lektsii po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu protsessu. M., 1950.
6. Iski i sudebnye resheniya: Sbornik statey / R.S. Bevzenko, E.A. Belyanevich, I.A. Voytko i dr. / Pod red. M.A.
7. Rozhkovoy. M., 2009.
8. Kurylev S.V. Osnovy teorii dokazyvaniya v sovetskom pravosudii. Minsk, 1969.
9. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeyskoe pravo. M., 2008.
10. Novitskiy V.A. Teoriya rossiyskogo protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya i pravoprimeneniya. Stavropol', 2002.
11. Prikhod'ko A.I. Vosprepyatstvovaniyu razresheniyu del v arbitrazhnykh sudakh: aktual'nye voprosy sudebnogo
12. pravoprimeneniya. M., 2008.
13. Reshetnikova I.V. Dokazatel'stvennoe pravo v rossiyskom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk.
14. Ekaterinburg, 1997.
15. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Ugolovnyy protsess: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. SPb., 2005.
16. Treushnikov M.K. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse. M., 1982.
17. Yudel'son K.S. Izbrannoe: Sovetskiy notariat. Problemy dokazyvaniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse.
18. M., 2005.
19. Yuzefovich V.B. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie v arbitrazhnom protsesse: analiz pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki.
20. Vyvody sudebnogo yurista. M., 2012.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.