|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Dobrynin, N.M.
Brief essay on the fate of Russian constitutionalism:
on nature, evolution and urgency
of the constitutional reform
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 12.
P. 1737-1752.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52110
Dobrynin, N.M. Brief essay on the fate of Russian constitutionalism:
on nature, evolution and urgency
of the constitutional reform
Abstract:
The object of study in this article is Russian constitutionalism, its nature, principles and factors, allowing for
its implementation, as well as the perspectives of constitutional target-setting in Russia in the light of urgent need for
constitutional reform. The author pays much attention to the definition of constitutionalism, as well as the history of its
development in the Russian state. Based upon his own study and analysis of numerous works of legal scholars, as well
as upon the comparison of provisions declared by the Constitution with the political, economic, social and cultural reality,
then the author draws a conclusion that there are deeply rooted contradictions in the Russian constitutionalism, and
they allow one to call it non-sustainable. In the process of studies the author used the following methods: classification,
analysis, synthesis, comparative legal studies, empirical and historic methods. The article includes scientifically novel
elements, such as author’s definition of constitutionalism, as well as defining the vector for the constitutional target-setting
in Russia and the main prerequisites for the constitutional reform.
Keywords:
state system, constitutionalism, constitutional reform, constitutional crisis, constitution, legal culture, social systems, administration, functions of the constitution, target –setting.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Yanov A. Montesk'e protiv Marksa // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1992. – ¹ 1;
2. Chirkin V.E. Reforma rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: etapy i problemy // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2000. – ¹ 5;
3. Chirkin V.E. Konstitutsionalizm i sovremennaya tsivilizatsiya // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2006. – ¹ 3 (Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 5). – M., 2006;
4. Tarasenko F.P. Prikladnoy sistemnyy analiz. – M.: KNORUS, 2010;
5. Topornin B.N. Konstitutsionnaya reforma – put' k pravovomu gosudarstvu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1990. – ¹ 4;
6. Stepanov I.M. Uroki i paradoksy rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma. – M., 1996;
7. Stepanov I.M. Grani rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma (KhKh vek) // Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 1. – M., 1992;
8. Reysner M.A. Gosudarstvo burzhuazii i RSFSR. – M.-Pg: Gosizdat, 1923;
9. Medushevskiy A.N. Chto takoe mnimyy konstitutsionalizm? // So-tsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 1994. – ¹ 2;
10. Medushevskiy A.N. Konstitutsionnaya monarkhiya v Evrope, Yaponii i Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1994. – ¹ 6;
11. Luchin V.O. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Problemy realizatsii. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2002;
12. Leontovich V.V. Istoriya liberalizma v Rossii. 1762–1914. – M.: Russkiy put', 1995;
13. Kravets I.A. Formirovanie rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma (problemy teorii i praktiki). – M.-Novosibirsk: OOO «Izdatel'stvo YuKEA», 2002;
14. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm: ustoychivost' vlasti i obshche-stvennogo razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Izd-e IFiPr SO RAN, 1994;
15. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm i rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost' v nachale KhKh veka: Ucheb. posobie. – M.: IVTs «Marketing»; Novosibirsk: OOO «Izdatel'stvo YuKEA», 2000;
16. Kon'kov N. Rossiya – superoligarkhiya [Elektronnyy resurs] / Agentstvo politicheskikh novostey [sayt]. — URL: http://www.apn.ru/opinions/article9378.htm (data obrashcheniya 1.11.2013);
17. Kerimov A.D. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo: voprosy teorii. – M.: Norma, 2007;
18. Egorov S.A. Konstitutsionalizm v SShA: politiko-pravovye as-pekty. – M.: Nauka, 1993;
19. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Fragmentarnyy konstitutsionalizm // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2006. – ¹ 3 (Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 5). – M., 2006;
20. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Teoriya i praktika federalizma: sistem-nyy podkhod. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2009;
21. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Verifikatsiya definitsiy konstitutsionnoy nauki vs. uvlechenie obshchimi mestami // Politika i obshchestvo. – 2009. – ¹ 5;
22. Bogdanova N.A. Sistema nauki konstitutsionnogo prava. – M.: Yurist', 2001;
23. Bogdanova N.A. Kategoriya «konstitutsionalizm» v nauke konstitu-tsionnogo prava // Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm: problemy i resheniya. – M., 1999;
24. Bobrova N.A. Konstitutsionnyy stroy i konstitutsionalizm v Ros-sii. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, Zakon i pravo, 2003;
25. Avak'yan S.A. Tochka otscheta – narod // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2006. – 28 okt.;
26. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: norma i deystvitel'nost' // Neprikosnovennyy zapas. – 2008. – ¹ 5 (61);
27. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii: priroda, evolyutsiya, sovremen-nost'. – M.: RYuID, 1997;
28. Avak'yan S.A. Desyat' prichin dlya konstitutsionnykh reform v Ros-sii // Nezavisimaya gazeta. – 2012. – 16 okt.;
29. Sibert M. Traite de droit international public. – T. I. – P., 1951.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
