Статья 'Формирование у будущих экономистов и инженеров умения многосторонне оценивать деятельность в процессе обучения математике' - журнал 'Современное образование' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Modern Education
Reference:

How future economists and engineers acquire the skills for multilateral assessment adequacy in the process of teaching mathematics

Melnikov Yurii Borisovich

PhD in Physics and Mathematics

Docent, the department of Applied Mathematics, Ural State University of Economics Docent, Institute of Radioelectronics and information Technologies, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta Street 62, office #476

UriiMelnikov58@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Boyarsky Mikhail Dmitrievich

PhD in Pedagogy

Docent, the department of Applied Mathematics, Ural State University of Economics

620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta Street 62, office #476

bmd63@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Lokshin Mikhail Davidovich

PhD in Physics and Mathematics

Docent, the department of Applied Mathematics, Ural State University of Economics

620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta Street 62, office #476

lok972008@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8736.2018.4.27930

Review date:

06-11-2018


Publish date:

02-01-2019


Abstract: The object of this research is the process of teaching mathematics to the economists and engineers. The subject of this research is the formation of skills for comprehensive and multilateral assessment of adequacy of the phenomena under consideration in the process of teaching mathematics to the economists and engineers. The goal of this work lies in structuring the model of multilateral assessment of mathematical activity (its objectives, methods, and results) and the application of mathematics as the component of economic and engineering education. The authors suggest the multi-criteria approach towards assessing the indicated phenomena on the basis of the original theory of modelling and theory of adequacy. The estimation of quality of the model in the theory of adequacy is defined via comparing the assessable model with the stated reference model. Research methodology includes the theoretical analysis of the modern mathematical education, theory of modelling, competence and activity approaches. In Y. B. Melnikov’s theory of modelling, the estimation of adequacy of the model is viewed as a result of comparison of the assessable and reference models. Evaluation of adequacy is viewed as a function, which arguments are the assessable and reference models. This allowed acquiring new scientific results: formalization of a specific attribute of adequacy can begin either with the structuring of reference model (with further concretization of the corresponding functions), or with the formation of the comparison method (with further determination of referenced model and formalization of the corresponding function).


Keywords: adequacy characteristics systems, formal and constructive interpretation of the model, reference models, theory of modeling, multilateral assessment of adequacy, adequacy of models, mathematical education, adequacy assessment, multilateral assessment of activity, activity approach
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Стройк, Д. Я. Краткий очерк истории математики / Д. Я. Стройк.— М.: Наука, 1990. – 256 с.
2.
Колмогоров, А. Н. Математика — наука и профессия / А. Н. Колмогоров.—М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2016. – 288 с.
3.
Рыбников, К. А. Профессия — математик / К. А. Рыбников. — М.: Просвещение, 1989. – 96 c.
4.
Попов, Н. И. Методические подходы при экспериментальном обучении математике студентов вуза / Н. И. Попов, Е. Н. Никифорова // Интеграция образования.—2018.—Т. 22, № 1 (90).—С. 193–206.
5.
Дворяткина, С. Н. Синергия гуманитарного и математического знания как педагогическое условие решения междисциплинарных проблем / С. Н. Дворяткина, А. А. Дякина, С. А. Розанова // Интеграция образования.—2017.—Т. 21, № 1 (86).—С. 8–18.
6.
Мышкис, А. Д. Лекции по высшей математике. 5-е изд., перераб. и доп. / А. Д. Мышкис.—СПб.: Лань, 2007.‑ 688 с.
7.
Варга, Б. Язык, музыка, математика. Пер с венгерского Ю.А. Данилова / Б. Варга, Ю. Димень, Э. Лопариц.—М.: Мир, 1981.
8.
Мельников, Ю.Б. Алгебраический подход к математическому моделированию и обучению математической и «предматематической» деятельности / Ю.Б. Мельников, К.С. Поторочина/ Ярославский педагогический вестник, 2010, № 3: Физико-математические и естественные науки. с.19-24.
9.
Мельников, Ю. Б. Улучшение адекватности экономических моделей / Ю. Б. Мельников, Е. А. Онохина, С. А. Шитиков // Известия УрГЭУ.— 2018.— Т. 19, № 1.— С. 94–106.
10.
Мельников, Ю.Б. Алгебраический подход к стратегиям проектной деятельности/ Ю.Б. Мельников, И.В. Хрипунов, В.С. Чоповда / Известия УрГЭУ, 2014 № 2 (53). С. 115-123.
11.
Мельников, Ю.Б. Стратегии построения модели / Ю.Б. Мельников, Д.А. Евдокимова, Е.А. Дергачев, Д.А. Успенский, М.С. Огородов / Управленец, 2014 № 3 (49). С. 52-56.
12.
Ларина, Г.С. Анализ практических задач по математике: теоретическая модель и опыт применения на уроках / Г.С. Ларина // Вопросы образования.—2016.—№ 3.—С. 151–168.
13.
Freudenthal, H. Mathematik als pädagogische Aufgabe. Band 1,2 / H. Freudenthal.—Ernst Klett Verlag, Stuttgart, 1973, 1977.
14.
Proudfoot, D.E. The effect of a reading comprehension software program on student achievement in mathematics / D.E. Proudfoot // International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education. — 2016. — Vol. 4, no. 1. — P. 39–48.
15.
Hoogland, K. Computer-based assessment of mathematics into the twenty-first century: pressures and tensions / K. Hoogland, D. Tout // ZDM-Mathematics Education. — 2018. — Vol. 50, no. 4. — P. 675–686.
16.
Guseinova, E.E. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of professional competencies in the technical students’ individual work through the example of studying the discipline «hydraulics and fluid mechanics» / E.E. Guseinova // European Journal of Contemporary Education. — 2018. — Vol. 7, no. 1. — P. 118–126.
17.
Contemporary didactics in higher education in Russia / V.A. Shershneva, L.V. Shkerina, V.N. Sidorov et al. // European Journal of Contemporary Education. — 2016. — Vol. 17, no. 3. — P. 357–367.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website