Статья 'Верую, потому что абсурдно: Магия религии' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

I Believe Because This is Absurd: The Magic of Religion

Subbotsky Eugene

Doctor of Psychology

Professor, the department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Great Britain

CR0 2GG, Velikobritaniya, London oblast', g. Croydon, ul. Saffron Square, 11

subbotsky@me.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8701.2015.6.14239

Review date:

17-01-2015


Publish date:

26-12-2015


Abstract: In this paper I discuss the following issues: Why do people believe in god when there is no proof of god’s existence? Can one live without believing in anything? How does a traditional belief in god coexist with the belief in magic? The analysis brings one to the conclusion that the belief in the supernatural world appears in early man as a result of the convergence of two factors. The first was the emergence of new cognitive abilities, such as the ability to view all nature as alive and ascribe some kind of consciousness to inanimate things (animistic thinking). The second was the awareness of the inevitability of death, and frustration resulting from this awareness. Spirits of the ancestors, which populated the invisible world of dead, became the first gods. Gradually, the “mainstream” religion separated itself from everyday magic, yet it maintained the link with magic through the belief in the supernatural beings and miracles. Novelty: (1) For the first time, religion is analysed in the context of recent psychological studies of magical thinking; (2) The analysis of the alliance between mainstream religion and science against magic is also a novel element. Conclusions: (1) Historically and psychologically, religion is derivative from early magical beliefs; (2) When mainstream religion separates itself from magic, it starts to view magic as a rival in the struggle for human minds; (3) As a result, religion becomes hostile towards magic and views magic as a manifestation of dark forces; (4) Science ousted the belief in magic into the subconscious, while putting pressure on the mainstream religious belief at the same time. Nevertheless, there still exist a number of supernatural phenomena that remain unexplained by science; (5) There is a possibility that in the future contradictions between science, magic and religion will be smoothing out. As a result, certain supernatural phenomena, which at present are a subject for hot debates, will become part of the mainstream worldview and, quite possibly, will be used for controlling some spiritual and physical processes.


Keywords: miracles, illusion of control, participation, ancestral spirits, theories of mind, animistic thinking, magical thinking, religious beliefs, rational mysticism, paranormal phenomena
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertullitan
2.
Dunbar, R. (2014). Human evolution. London: Pelican Books.
3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_origin_of_religions#cite_note-7
4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_Explained
5.
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Tylor, Edward. 1920 [1871]. Primitive Culture. New York: J. P. Putnam’s Sons.
7.
Subbotsky, E. (2001). Causal explanations of events by children and adults: Can alternative causal modes coexist in one mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 23-46
8.
Subbotsky, E. (2007). Children's and adults' reaction to magical and ordinary suggestion: Are suggestibility and magical thinking psychologically close relatives?
9.
Subbotsky, E. & Quinteros, G. (2002). Do cultural factors affect causal beliefs? Rational and magical thinking in Britain and Mexico. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 519-543.
10.
Davis, P. (1992). The mind of God. The scientific basis for a rational world. New York: Orion Production.
11.
Tiger, L. & McGuire, M. (2010). God;s brain. New York: Prometheus Books.
12.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Jpurnal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
13.
Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K. & Rodriges, S. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Jpurnal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218-231.
14.
Vyse, S. A.. (2000). Believing in magic.: The psychology of superstition. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_Chapel_Experiment
16.
Horgan, J. (2004). Rational misticism. Spirituality meets science in the search of enlightment. New York: Houghtn Mifflin Co.
17.
Newberg, A., & D’Aquili, E. (1999). The mystical mind: Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
18.
Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E. & Vince, R. (2001). Why God won’t go away. New York: Ballantine Books.
19.
Persinger, M. (1987). Neuropsychological bases of god beliefs. New York: Praeger.
20.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_helmet
21.
Persinger M.A. (2009) Are our brains structured to avoid refutations of belief in God? An experimental study, Religion, 39, 34-42.
22.
Penfield, W. (1975).The Mystery of the Mind : A Critical Study of Consciousness and the Human Brain. NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Bem, D.J., & Honorton, C. (1994). Does Psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
24.
Dunne, B., Nelson, R.D., & Jahn, R.G (1988). Operator-related anomalies in a random mechanical cascade. Journal of scientific exploration, 2, 155-179.
25.
Nelson, R.D., Bradish, G.J., Jahn, R.G., & Dunne, B.J. (1994). A linear pendulum experiment: Effects of operator intention on damping rate. . Journal of scientific exploration, 4, 471-489.
26.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yerkes-Dodson_law
27.
Subbotsky, E. & Ryan, A. (2009) Motivation and belief in the paranormal in a remote viewing task (Unpublished manuscript), obtainable from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/subbotsk/Subbotsky & Ryan 1.pdf
28.
Subbotsky, E. (2014) Sensing the future: Reversed causality or a non-standard observer effect? SAGE open, January-March, 1-17. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/subbotsk/Sensing the future(1).pdf
29.
Lehrer, J. (2010). The truth wears off. Is there something wrong with the scientific method? New Yorker, December 13, 52-57.
30.
Subbotskii E.V. Planetarii chudes: Magiya v gostyakh u fiziki // Psikholog.-2014.-№3.-C. 175-220. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8701.2014.3.12286. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_12286.html.
31.
Subbotskii E.V. Net, ves' ya ya ne umru: Magiya nadezhdy. Notabene, Psikholog, na rassmotrenii.
32.
Subbotsky, E. (2013). The belief in magic in the age of science. Sage open, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/4/1/2158244014521433
33.
Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire‬, Volume 42‬‬ http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zmk_AQAAMAAJ
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website