Статья 'Стратегии принятия управленческих решений на примере выработки групповых решений в бизнес-симуляции ' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Strategy management decision-making by the example of group decisions in business simulation

Smolko Svetlana

post-graduate student, lecturer at RZD Corporate University, branch in St. Petersburg

190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, str. Nab. Obvodnogo Kanala, 114, of. 205

s.a.smolko@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8701.2016.4.19838

Review date:

24-07-2016


Publish date:

01-09-2016


Abstract: The main focus of the article - group decisions in management. A small group is considered in line with the concept of Karl Vick as a carrier of «collective intelligence». This position allows you to correlate the results of the group decisions development with the average characteristics of the group members. Decision-making in the group is analyzed in terms of information processing, knowledge sharing in the small group and in the organization as a whole, the impact on the success of the solution of diversity of participants the group, the roles flexibility of group in situations change. One of the forms of organization of solutions problematic tasks in the group are the business games, including management games. In the theoretical review shows the classification of business games and their main characteristics.Empirical research is based on the modeling of management activities with the help of a business game that simulates the operation of business from the top level. Participants (sample 548 middle managers) were combined in small groups of 5-6 people, and make management decisions in partially structured situation, with limited time to make a decision. In total 66 groups were formed. To analyze and test the hypothesis using the results of group decisions that were decorated as the output characteristics of the game companies aimed at meeting the conditional shareholders and potential investors.The hypothesis that for group management decisions associated with doing business in a competitive environment, characterized by the presence of different strategies: focus on the rapid financial results "here and now"; focus on solving current operational problems; orientation in decisions on long-term development of the company, has been confirmed.


Keywords: processes of information processing, operational decisions, long-term development, quick financial result, business game, decisions strategy, collective intelligence, group decision making, knowledge sharing, diversity of group
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Diev V.S. Upravlencheskie resheniya: neopredelennost', modeli, intuitsiya. Novosibirsk, NGU, 2001. 196 s.
2.
Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Psikhologiya upravleniya sovmestnoi deyatel'nost'yu: novye napravleniya issledovanii. M: Izd. Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010. 248 s.
3.
Kaneman D. Dumai medlenno… Reshai bystro. Moskva: AST, 2014. 653 s.
4.
Karpov A.V. Strukturno-funktsional'naya organizatsiya protsessov prinyatiya gruppovykh reshenii // Voprosy psikhologii. 2004. № 1. S. 126-136.
5.
Nestik T.A. Psikhologicheskie aspekty upravleniya znaniyami // Innovatsionnoe razvitie. Ekonomika, intellektual'nye resursy, upravlenie znaniyami / pod red. B.Z. Mil'nera. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. S. 590-611.
6.
Mararitsa L.V. Kognitivnye effekty prinyatiya reshenii v gruppe: dissertatsiya kandidata psikhologicheskikh nauk: 19.00.05 Sankt-Peterburg, 2007 270 s. RGB OD, 61:07-19/447
7.
Skott P. Psikhologiya otsenki i prinyatiya reshenii. / Perevod s angl. M.: Informatsionno-izdatel'skii dom “Filin''”, 1998. 368 s.
8.
Spiridonov V.F. Psikhologiya myshleniya: Reshenie zadach i problem. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Genezis, 2006. 319 s.
9.
Chempion D., Karr N. Startuya na pyatoi peredache: interv'yu s venchurnym kapitalistom Vinodom Khosloi. // Iskusstvo upravleniya, 2001. №2 (8). S. 18-29.
10.
Shurov'eski D. Mudrost' tolpy. / Perevod s angl. M.: OOO I.D. «Vil'yams», 2007. 304 s.
11.
Shchedrovitskii G. P. Organizatsionno-deyatel'nostnaya igra kak novaya forma organizatsii i metod razvitiya kollektivnoi mysledeyatel'nosti / Izbrannye trudy. M.: Shk. Kul't. Polit. 1995. S. 115-142. 800 s.
12.
Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. & the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 416 r.
13.
Glöckner Andreas, Betsch Tilmann. Multiple-Reason Decision Making Based on Automatic Processing. // Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. Bonn, 2008. №12. P.1-44.
14.
Karau S.J. Kelly J.R. The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. // Journal of Experiential Social Psychology, 1992. V. 28 (6). P. 542-571.
15.
Koskinen Kaj U., Pihlanto Pekka, Vanharanta Hannu. Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. // International Journal of Project Management, 2003. №21. P. 281–290.
16.
Weick Karl E. and Roberts Karlene H. Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 38, №3. P. 357-381.
17.
Wolley A., Chabris C., Pentland A., Yashmi N., Malone T. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. // Science, 2010. V 330. P. 686-688.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website