Статья 'Гражданский диалог в ЕС и Евразийский интеграционный проект : сравнительно - дискурсивный анализ' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Civil dialogue in EU and the Eurasian integration project: comparison and discourse

Zaitsev Aleksandr Vladimirovich

Associate professor of the Department of Philosophy and Political Studies at Nekrasov Kostroma State University

156005, Russia, Kostromskaya oblast', g. Kostroma, ul. Ovrazhnaya, 20/23, kv. 1

aleksandr-kostroma@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Review date:

17-11-2012


Publish date:

1-12-2012


Abstract: This article examines the institutionalization of civil dialogue in the EU, regarding its constitutional law and political aspects. Despite not having an established definition, Civil dialogue is perceived as one of the most important tools of democratic participation and dialogue in the EU. The article describes the main forms of civil dialogue and explains the role of civil society in transnational processes of integration in the EU. Those communicatory and integration processes of the EU are viewed side by side with the dialogue between the state and the civil society in Russian Federation and other Eurasian post-Soviet countries.


Keywords: civil dialogue, institunalization, integration, European Union, Eurasia Project
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gromoglasova E.S. Teoriya i praktika politicheskogo upravleniya v Evropeiskom soyuze. M.: IMEMO RAN, 2009. – 116 s.
2.
Komleva N. A. I dr. Spetsifika politicheskoi sistemy Evrosoyuza // Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya obshchestvennye nauki: filosofiya politiki i politologiya. – 2006, № 42. – S. 106-112.
3.
Ponomareva E Evraziiskii proekt versus «novyi mirovoi poryadok». URL : http://yandex.ru/yandsearch?clid=39942&text=&lr=213.
4.
Putin V.V. «Novyi integratsionnyi proekt dlya Evrazii — budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya»//Izvestiya, 3 oktyabrya, 2011 goda. URL: http://www.izvestia.ru/news/5027
5.
Tipalo E.E. Obshchestvennaya palata Rossiiskoi Federatsii kak institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva. Avtoreferat… kandidata sotsiologicheskikh nauk. – Rostov-na Donu, 2011-29s.
6.
Chetverikov A. O. Dogovor o Evropeiskom Soyuze (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora). URL: http://eulaw.ru/treaties/teu.
7.
Shataev I. Lissabonskii dogovor – pravovaya model' demokratii, dialoga i evropeiskogo razvitiya. URL: http://www.google.ru/search?hl =ru&source=hp&biw=1271&bih=598&q .
8.
EU Civil Society Contact Group. Representativity of NGOs taking part in civil dialogue. 16 March 2006. URL: http://act4europe.horus/modul/FileLib/Briefing%20representativity.pdf.
9.
Civil Dialogue Making it work better Report researched and written by ElodieFazi and Jeremy Smith – 98 p. [Elektronnyiresurs] URL: http: //act4europe.horus. be/module/ FileLib /Civil%20dialogue,%20making%20it%20work%20better.pdf .
10.
Nahtigal H. Institutionalising Civil Dialogue – Overview of existing Policy measures, Sept. 2010 – 55 p. URL: http://www.cnvos.si/UserFiles/File/ Zagovornistvo/Analize /institucionalizacija%20 civi lnega%20dialoga.pdf .
11.
Structured Dialogue with Commissioner Margot Wallström EU Communication Policy and Plan D – 46 p.URL: http://www.cor.europa.eu/migrated_data/Wallstrom_2387.pdf.
12.
Towards a structured framework for European Civil Dialogue. Brussels, 15 February 2010 – 8 p. URL: http://www.civicforum.fr/documents_towards_a_structured_framework_for_european_civil_dialogue.pdf . Zaitsev A.V. FILOSOFIYa DIALOGA I DIALOGIKA GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA: ISTOKI I SUShchNOST'' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-4.-C. 1-53. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.4.143. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_143.html
13.
Zaitsev A.V. INSTITUTsIONAL''NYI DIALOG V SFERE KOMMUNIKATsII GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA: TEORETIKO-METODOLOGIChESKII PODKhOD // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 21-54. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.1.110. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_110.html
14.
Zaitsev A.V. DIALOG GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA KAK PEREGOVORNYI PROTsESS: LINGVO-POLITOLOGIChESKII ASPEKT. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-3.-C. 34-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.3.120. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_120.html 36.
15.
A.V. Zaitsev Grazhdanskii dialog v ES i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii: opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-10.-C. 28-36. Tarasenko V.G. Podkhod k interpretatsii rossiiskoi-evraziiskoi tsivilizatsii skvoz' prizmu vremeni//Politika i Obshchestvo,-№12-2012.-s. 99-107
16.
Karpov Ya.S. Osobennosti vvoza v Rossiiskuyu Federatsiyu i vyvoza iz Rossiiskoi Federatsii narkoticheskikh sredstv, psikhotropnykh veshchestv i ikh prekursorov, a takzhe sil'nodeistvuyushchikh i yadovitykh veshchestv v usloviyakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES//Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, №7-2012.-s. 50-5
17.
Kholov I. A. Evraziiskii Soyuz, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya//Pravo i politika,-№5-2012,-s. 909-916,
18.
R. S. Kurmanguzhin — Iz istorii razrabotki kazakhstanskoi gosudarstvennoi programmy «Put' v Evropu»//Pravo i politika,-№2-2012, s. 273-281
19.
Khrenov N. A. Sintez Zapada i Vostoka kak kul'turologicheskaya problema//Kul'tura i iskusstvo, №1-2012, s. 18-27
20.
Nazmutdinov B. V. Ideino-istoricheskie osnovy politicheskikh i pravovykh vzglyadov evraziitsev //Pravo i politika,-№9-2011, s. 1558-1575
21.
Gaikin V. A. Geopolitika evraziiskogo prostranstva i proekt “Tumangan”//Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene,-№7-2010
22.
Akilova M.M. Sovremennoe evraziistvo i Tadzhikistan: chast' i tseloe//Politika i Obshchestvo, №6-2010
23.
Remezova N.A. Predposylki formirovaniya evraziiskoi integratsionnoi gruppirovki//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations, № 1.-2010
24.
Yaroshkina M.E. Rol' Rossii v razvitii integratsionnykh protsessov v Tsentral'noi Azii v ramkakh EvrAzES//Politika i Obshchestvo,-№ 2.-2010
25.
Tyutyuryukov N.N., Tyutyuryukov V.N. Kazakhstan-nalogovaya laboratoriya EvrAzES//Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie,-№1.-2010
26.
Smbatyan A.S. Pervoe reshenie Suda evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva – v kopilku avtoriteta//Pravo i politika,-№12.-2012. s. 2003-2007
27.
Parkhomenko R.N. N. Berdyaev o kul'turnom i politicheskom svoeobrazii Rossii i Evropy//Politika i Obshchestvo,-№ 10.-2012. s. 66-
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website