Статья 'Эволюция Организации американских государств в 90-е гг. ХХ века' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Evolution of the Organization of American States in the 1990s

Khadorich Liliya Vyacheslavovna

PhD in History

Researcher, Ibero-American Centre of Saint Petersburg University

191060, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Smol'nogo, 1/3, 8 pod''ezd

lkhadorich@gmail.com
Jeifets Victor Lazarevich

Doctor of History

Professor of Department of Theory and History of International Relations of Saint Petersburg State University

191060, Russia, St. Petersburg, ul. Smol'nogo, 1/3, 8 pod''ezd

jeifets@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8671.2015.2.14325

Review date:

29-01-2015


Publish date:

21-05-2015


Abstract: The period of the 1990s was a turning point for the Organization of American States (OAS): on the one hand the international organization assumed a continental character having formally united all the 35 independent countries of the Western hemisphere, and on the other hand, the change of the foundations of international relations in the result of the collapse of the bipolar system meant an inevitable transformation of the fundamental principles of the OAS activities. Democracy promotion, resulting from the processes of democratization of the 1980s, started to develop; a fundamental revision of different security approaches started on the basis of rejection of an idea of combating the Communist threat; the need to create a new scenario of regional development in general became evident. The main purpose of the article is to provide an analysis of the main institutional and functional transformation of the OAS in the 1990s. The emphasis is made on the contradictions the member-states faced in their search for the models of multilateral cooperation within the framework of the oldest regional organization of the Western Hemisphere. The authors propose the idea that the transformations of the OAS in the period of the 1990s resulted from the joint search for new models of regional development, however the deep Inter-American controversies did not allow the OAS to fully overcome the negative legacy of the previous decades and to update the mechanisms of interaction, providing them with the maximum efficiency. Inability to cope with the existing controversies limited the achievements of the OAS in the period under consideration. Nevertheless, the 1990s laid the principal directions of the OAS development in the beginning of the XXI century. 


Keywords: Inter-American System, Inter-American relations, democratization, regional integration, Latin America, the USA, the end of Cold War, the OAS, regional security, Summits of the Americas
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Quickenden C.L. Helms-Burton and Canadian-American Relations at the Crossroads: The Need for an Effective, Bilateral Cuban Policy / C.L. Quickenden // American University International Law Review. 1997. Vol. 12. No 4. PP. 733-767. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr
2.
Thomas C.R., Magloire J.T. Regionalism Versus Multilateralism: the Organization of American States in a Global Changing Environment / C.R. Thomas, J.T. Magloire. Boston: Kluwer, 2000. P. 46.
3.
Cooper A., Legler Th. The OAS Democratic Solidarity Paradigm: Questions of Collective and National Leadership / A. Cooper, Th. Legler // Latin American Politics and Society. 2001. No 1 (43). PP. 103-126.
4.
Beyond Sovereignty: Collective Defending Democracy in the Americas / ed. by T. Farer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 417 p.
5.
The Future of Inter-American Relations / ed. by J.I. Domínguez. N.Y.: Routledge, 2000. 317 p.
6.
Sudarev V.P. Sistema «kollektivnoi bezopasnosti demokratii» mezhamerikanskii opyt 90-kh godov / V.P. Sudarev // Latinskaya Amerika. 2000. №10. C. 7-8.
7.
The Santiago Commitment to Democracy and the Renewal of the Inter-American System. AG/RES. (XXI-O/91). – [Electronic Resource]. – URL: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/120043.pdf
8.
AG/RES. 1080 (XXI-O/91). – [Electronic Resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/agres1080.htm
9.
Latinskaya Amerika v sovremennoi mirovoi politike / [otv. Red. V. M. Davydov] ; In-t Latinskoi Ameriki RAN. M.: Nauka, 2009. 581 s.
10.
Protocol of Amendment to the Charter of the Organization of American States “Protocol of Washington”. Washington, 1992. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_A-56_Protocol_of_Washington.htm
11.
Kuteinikov A.E. OAG – tipichnaya i unikal'naya mezhdunarodnaya struktura / A. E. Kuteinikov // Latinskaya Amerika. 2012. №5. S. 26.
12.
Mace G., Thérien J.P., Haslam P. Governing the Americas: Assessing Multilateral Institutions / G. Mace, J.P. Thérien, P. Haslam. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007. 317 p.
13.
Declaration of Montrouis: A New Vision of the OAS. AG/DEC. 8 (XXV-O/95). – [Electronic Resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/EN/PINFO/RES/RESGA95/agd0008.htm
14.
Tsit. Po: Zhirnov O.A., Sheremet'ev I.K. Novoe izdanie panamerikanizma: Latinoamerikanskaya politika Dzh. Busha / O.A. Zhirnov, I.K. Sheremet'ev. M., 2005. S. 81-82.
15.
Protocol of Amendment to the Charter of the Organization of American States “Protocol of Managua”. – Nicaragua, 1993. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_A-58_Protocol_of_Managua.htm
16.
URL: http://www.oas.org/es/cidi/
17.
Martynov B.F. Sila prava ili pravo sily. Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost' (latinoamerikanskii rakurs) / B.F. Martynov. M., 2004. C. 81.
18.
Weiffen B. The Inter-American Security System: Changes and Challenges / B. Weiffen // Carta internacional. 2010. No 1. P. 24.
19.
AG/RES. 1353 (XXV-O/95).
20.
URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-55.html
21.
URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/Treaties/b-58.html
22.
URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-63.html
23.
URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pdf/transpar.pdf
24.
AG/RES.813 (XVI-0/86).
25.
Commitment of Mar del Plata. – [Electronic Resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/Docu1.htm
26.
AG/RES. 1650 (XXIX-O/99).
27.
Hirst M. Los claroscuros de la seguridad regional en las Américas / M. Hirst // Nueva Sociedad, 2003. 185. P. 93.
28.
AG/RES. 1123 (XXI-O/91).
29.
Martynov, B. F. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii stran Latinskoi Ameriki / B. F. Martynov. M.: Navona, 2008. S. 300-301.
30.
Manger W. Pan America in Crisis. The Future of the OAS / W. Manger. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1961. 104 p.
31.
Munoz, H., D’Leon, M. The Right to Democracy in the Americas / H. Munoz, M. D’Leon // Journal of International Studies and World Affairs. Spring, 1998. Vol. 40, No 1. P. 10.
32.
Levitt B.S. A Desultory Defense of Democracy: OAS Resolution 1080 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter / B.S. Levitt // Latin American Politics and Society. September 2006. Vol. 48, Issue 3. P. 104-105.
33.
Boniface D.S. Is There a Democratic Norm in the Americas? An Analysis of the Organization of American States / D.S. Boniface // Global Governance. 2002. No 8. P. 374-375.
34.
URL: http://www.oas.org/charter/docs/resolution1_en_p4.htm
35.
The Participation of the OAS in the Process of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). – OAS Trade Unit, 1997. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.summit-americas.org/CEGCI%20Docs/ce-gci-115-97-English.htm
36.
Podrobnee sm., naprimer: Sudarev V.P. Dve Ameriki posle okonchaniya «kholodnoi voiny» / V.P. Sudarev. M.: Nauka, 2004. S. 162-167.
37.
OAS Resolution on Free Trade and Investment in the Hemisphere. AG/RES. 1364 (XXVI-O/96). – [Electronic Resource]. – URL: http://www.oas.org/JURIDICO/english/ga-res96/Res-1364.htm
38.
Herz M. The Organization of American States. Global Governance away from the Media / M. Herz. Routledge, 2011. 127 p.
39.
Horwitz B. The Transformation of the Organization of American States. A Multilateral Framework for Regional Governance / B. Horwitz. London: Anthem Press, 2011. 256 p.
40.
Shaw C.M. Limits to Hegemonic Influence in the Organization of American States / C.M. Shaw // Latin American Politics and Society. 2003. Vol. 45, No 3. PP. 59-92
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website