Статья 'О некоторых проблемах определения и деятельности мозговых центров в Великобритании' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

On the certain issues of definition and work of the analytical centers in UK

Pripisnova Elena Sergeevna

PhD in Politics

Senior Educator, the department of History and Theory of International Relations, N. I. Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University

603095, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Prospekt Gagarina 23

poskr011@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-868X.2016.2.17200

Review date:

06-12-2015


Publish date:

01-04-2016


Abstract: This article analyzes the issues in studying the practical activity of the British analytical (think) centers in light of transformation of the state policy from Keynesian social democracy to free market (since 1970’s). The subject of the research is the UK think centers which act as “mediators” between the informed public opinion and political and government institutions. In the first part of the article, the author examines the problem of terminology of the “think centers”, as well as definition of these groups in the context of British politics of the XX century. In the second part, the author reviews the genesis of the think centers in UK, as well as the theoretical and practical aspects of their work. The following conclusions are made: there is no unified and accurate definition of the “think centers”; an opinion about the recent appearance of the thinks centers in UK is false; the work of the think centers is aimed at influencing the opinion of the establishment, and the provision of information for making the current decisions in the area of public policy.


Keywords: Definition, State policy, Political solutions, UK, Analytical institute, Think center, Public opinion, NIESR, PEP, RIIA
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Tim Hames, Richard Feasey. Anglo-American think tanks under Reagan and Thatcher. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1994. P.216.
2.
Starkin S.V. O transformatsii oboronnoi promyshlennosti SShA//Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2007. № 6. S. 231-237.
3.
Starkin S.V. Problemy tipologizatsii razvedyvatel'noi informatsii v amerikanskom teoreticheskom diskurse//Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 1. S. 329-335.
4.
R. Kent Weaver. The Changing World of Think Tanks. P.S: Political Science and Politics. Vol.22. No.3. Sept. 1989. P.564-568.
5.
Tim Hames, Richard Feasey. Op. cit. P.217.
6.
Terence R. Wright. The Religion of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
7.
Margaret Thatcher. The Path to Power. London: HarperCollins, 1995. P.252.
8.
Tessa Blackstone, William Plowden. Inside the Think Tank. London: Heinemann, 1988.
9.
Michael J. Prince. Policy Advice and Organisational Survival. Aldershot: Gower, 1983.
10.
Peter Hennessy, Simon Coates. Little Grey Cells: Think-Tanks, Governments and Policy-Making. Strathclyde Analysis Papers 6. 1991. P.2.
11.
Terence R. Wright. The Religion of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
12.
Royden Harrison. The Fabians: Aspects: Aspects of a very English socialism. // Iain Hampsher-Monk (ed), Defending Politics: Bernard Crick and Pluralism. London: British Academic Press, 1993.
13.
William Wallace. Between Two Worlds: Think Tanks and Foreign Policy. // C. Hill and P. Beshoff (eds.), Two Worlds of International Relations. London: Routledge and LSE, 1994. P. 141.
14.
Richard Higgott, Diane Stone. The limits of influence: foreign policy think tanks in Britain and the USA. Review of International Studies 20 (1994).
15.
William Wallace. Op. cit. P. 140.
16.
Paul Addison. The Road to 1945. London: Quartet Books, 1977. P.39.
17.
Alan Budd. The Politics of Economic Planning. London: Fontana edition, 1978. P.86.
18.
Kit Jones. Fifty Years of Economic Research: A Brief History of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. National Institute Economic Review. May 1988. P.36-59.
19.
David M Ricci, The Transformation of American Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993. P.21.
20.
Poskrebysheva E.S. O strategicheskikh podkhodakh ES po rasshireniyu prisutstviya v Aziatskom regione // Sovremennye tendentsii v obrazovanii i nauke. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 26 chastyakh. 2013. S. 124-126.
21.
Starkin S.V., Poskrebysheva E.S. Paradigma «glubinnoi ekologii» A.Neisa v kontekste razvitiya ekopolitologii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. № 4-1 (30). S. 164-168.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website