Статья 'Научные центры Великобритании и их роль в политическом процессе' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Scientific research institutions of Great Britain and their role in the political process

Pripisnova Elena Sergeevna

PhD in Politics

Senior Educator, the department of History and Theory of International Relations, N. I. Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University

603095, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Prospekt Gagarina 23

poskr011@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8671.2016.2.17580

Review date:

13-01-2016


Publish date:

08-06-2016


Abstract: The research subject includes the political research institutions of Great Britain, theoretical and practical aspects of their work, and their importance for the society and political public institutions. In the first part, the author considers the structure and activities of the three leading scientific institutions of Great Britain: the Institute of Economic Affairs, the Adam Smith Institute, and the Centre for Political Science; in the second part of the article, the author analyzes the importance and influence of research institutions on the political life of Great Britain and their effectiveness, their cooperation with the government, mass media, and participation in debates. The research methodology is based on the general scientific proposition about the system character of complex political processes, and the idea about the interdependence of factors conditioning the formation of the state’s political strategy. The most important methodological approach is the historical approach presupposing the study of social and political phenomena through their origin and evolution. The author concludes that the British scientific research institutions had formed in the 1980s and had become the significant figures in the complicated process of policy formation and its introduction into the global political space; creating a particular atmosphere and attitude and being the only opponents in the debates, scientific institutions had formed the very political process in Great Britain. They impulse innovations, struggle against passivity and inclination for compromise in parliamentary and bureaucratic procedures. 


Keywords: public opinion, government, political process, public institute, Margaret Thatcher, Centre for Political Science, the Adam Smith Institute, the Institute of Economic Affairs, Great Britain, scientific research center
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Colin Clark. The IEA and the Fabians // A. Seldon (ed.) The Emerging Consensus?-London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1981.
2.
Guardian, 10 March 1989.
3.
J.E.S. Hayward. Governing France. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983.
4.
Kay Lawson. Political Parties and Linkage.-New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1980. P.14.
5.
Pierre Birnbaum. Les élites dirigeantes en question // Le débat, No. 53. February 1989.
6.
Tessa Blackstone, William Plowden. Inside the Think Tank. London: Heinemann, 1988.
7.
Poskrebysheva E.S. O strategicheskikh podkhodakh ES po rasshireniyu prisutstviya v Aziatskom regione // Sovremennye tendentsii v obrazovanii i nauke. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 26 chastyakh. 2013. S. 124-126.
8.
Starkin S.V. O transformatsii oboronnoi promyshlennosti SShA // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2007. № 6. S. 231-237.
9.
Starkin S.V. Problemy tipologizatsii razvedyvatel'noi informatsii v amerikanskom teoreticheskom diskurse // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 1. S. 329-335.
10.
Starkin S.V., Poskrebysheva E.S. Paradigma «glubinnoi ekologii» A.Neisa v kontekste razvitiya ekopolitologii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. № 4-1 (30). S. 164-168.
11.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Kontseptual'nye osnovy lobbistskoi deyatel'nosti v sovremennoi Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 16 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10036.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website