Статья 'Публичный дискурс как фактор государственной политики России (на примере евразийской интеграции)' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

Public Discourse as the Factor of Russia's Public Policy (the Case Study of Eurasian Integration)

Kosorukov Artem Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Senior Educator, the faculty of Public Administration, the department of Political Analysis, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119992, Russia, g. Moscow, Lomonosovskii prospekt, 27k4, aud. A814

kosorukovmsu@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2018.3.21567

Review date:

28-12-2016


Publish date:

07-10-2018


Abstract: The subject of the research is the public discourse as the factor of efficient implementation of Russia's public policy viewed on the basis of its institutional basis, and the development of the Eurasian Economic union and European union. The public discourse of the Eurasian regionalism is viewed by the author of the article from the point of view of the development of state authority's legitimacy, the latter being created as a result of different political approaches and defined by national and regional identity of a state. The national and regional identity of the state is created is in relation to the 'others', i.e. the main foreign partners. The methodology of the research includes historical method, content analysis, functional and non-functional approaches to integration. The main conclusions of the research are the following: - a state needs a public discourse to define significant 'others' and its national interests which raises the efficiency of public policty; - efficient public discourse allows to achieve international recognition of state's interests and letitimacy of its political system; - the fact that the European Union is not ready for equal interaction with the Eurasian Economic union in the space of public discourse means that the public discourse of the EU and its identifiction of significant 'others' bear an exclusive nature; - public discourse of Eurasian Economic Union member states is in still developing and includes unstable representations of Russia and the EU as significant 'others'. 


Keywords: domestic policy, foreign policy, European Union, Eurasian Economic Union, national interests, identity, legitimacy, public policy, public discourse, Eurasian regionalism
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Aleshina E.Yu. Registry publichnogo politicheskogo diskursa i faktory ikh formirovaniya (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2016. № 4. S. 87-92.
2.
Klyuev Yu.V. Diskurs v massovoi kommunikatsii (mezhdistsiplinarnye kharakteristiki, kontseptsii, podkhody) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika. 2013. № 1. S. 207-217.
3.
Filippova E.V. Funktsional'naya spetsifika publichnogo diskursa kak institutsional'nogo vida obshcheniya / Yazykovaya lichnost' i effektivnaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom polikul'turnom mire: sbornik materialov mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Minsk, 23 – 24 okt. 2015 g.). Mn., 2015. S. 39-41.
4.
Lapshin I.E., Kosorukova A.A., Mukhametzhanova V.S. Social ethics of corporate anthem // 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM 2016. Albena, Bulgaria, 24-30 avgusta 2016 g. Published by STEF92 Technology Ltd, Sofiya, 2016. S. 833-840.
5.
Putin V.V. Novyi integratsionnyi proekt dlya Evrazii — budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsya segodnya // Izvestiya. 3 oktyabrya 2011 g. // http://izvestia.ru/news/502761 (data obrashcheniya: 28.12.2016).
6.
Solov'ev A.I. Ideologicheskii universalizm v pole rossiiskoi mental'nosti // Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2016. № 57. S. 6-13.
7.
Pshizova S.N. Mozhno li upravlyat' demokratiei? Ch. II. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 1. S. 32.
8.
Hopf T. Social construction of international politics: identities and foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2002.
9.
Kvashonkin A.V. Tekhnologiya «krasnykh revolyutsii» v Zakavkaz'e v nachale xx v // Politika i obshchestvo. 2016. № 4. S. 432-456.
10.
Mikhailova O.V. Vozmozhnosti gosudarstva po upravleniyu setevymi al'yansami // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik. 2013. № 38. S. 144-152.
11.
Smith M. The EU and The Diplomacy of Complex Interregionalism // The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2009, vol. 4. № 2. PP. 167-188.
12.
Buzan B. A World without Superpowers: de-centered globalism. Lecture delivered at Sheikh Zayed Theatre, London School of Economics, 10 May 2011
13.
Bagdasaryan V.E. Aksiologiya Rossii v perspektive mirovogo razvitiya // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. № 7. C. 837-854. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.12485.
14.
Iokhim A.N. Spetsifika formirovaniya vneshnepoliticheskogo diskursa (na primere vneshnei politiki Rossii v 2008-2010 gg.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. № 9. C. 1140-1147. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.9.13071.
15.
Turchenko M.S. Politicheskaya povestka dnya v diskursivnykh praktikakh V.V. Putina v period izbiratel'nykh kampanii federal'nogo urovnya 2000-2012 godov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. № 3. C. 114-120.
16.
Frolov D.B. Kontseptsiya informatsionnogo genshtaba i gosudarstvennoi informatsionnoi politiki Rossii // Mirovaya politika. 2015. № 1. C. 213-224. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12670. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12670.html
17.
Kara-Murza A.A. Karamzin, Shaden i Gellert. K istokam liberal'no-konservativnogo diskursa N.M. Karamzina // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2016. № 1. C. 101-106. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2016.1.18110.
18.
Bel'yaninov A.Yu. Vykhod iz integratsionnogo krizisa cherez povyshenie effektivnosti deyatel'nosti SNG // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. № 2. C. 176-182. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.7.
19.
Bel'yaninov A.Yu. Bezopasnost' Rossii na Evraziiskom prostranstve // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2013. № 2. C. 318 - 324. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.10.
20.
Semyachkin A.A. Rossiisko-indiiskaya kontseptsiya strategicheskogo partnerstva // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 2. C. 118 - 122. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.2.
21.
Panteleev O.E. Rossiiskaya gosudarstvennost' i integratsionnye protsessy na Evraziiskom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 1. C. 31 - 36. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.5.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website